Effects of Sweetener Consumption on Risk Factors for Heart Disease in Prediabetic Subjects

NCT07377097 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 80 participants, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Effects of Sweetener Consumption on Risk Factors for Heart Disease

RegistryNCT07377097, acronym Sweetheart
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, basic science
Enrollment80 (Estimated)
SponsorCharite University, Berlin, Germany (Other)
ConditionsPrediabetic State, Metabolic Syndrome, Insulin Resistance, Thrombosis, Hypercoagulable State, Cardiovascular (CV) Risk, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD), Prediabetes, Prediabetes / Type 2 Diabetes, Sweeteners
InterventionsSaccharin, Sucralose, Erythritol, Vehicle (Dietary supplement)
Datesstart 2026-01-05 (estimated), primary completion 2026-11-01 (estimated), completion 2026-11-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-01-29, last updated 2026-01-29

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Prediabetic State All trials for Metabolic Syndrome All trials of Saccharin All trials of Sucralose

-Summary

The aim of this prospective interventional study is to investigate the metabolic effects of consuming artificial and natural sweeteners in persons with prediabetes. Prediabetes is a condition characterized by blood sugar levels that are elevated above normal but not yet meeting the criteria for type 2 diabetes. This condition markedly increases the risk of progressing to type 2 diabetes, which in turn can lead to complications including cardiovascular diseases.

Artificial sweeteners such as saccharin and sucralose, as well as natural sugar substitutes like erythritol, are increasingly used as alternatives to sugar and are recommended for individuals at cardiometabolic risk - including overweight individuals, patients with prediabetes, or diabetics - to help reduce caloric intake. Recent literature has reported possible negative associations between artificial sweeteners and blood sugar regulation in healthy subjects (1). Additionally, effects on various blood cells have been observed. For example, erythritol has been shown to alter platelet function leading to increased reactivity in healthy study participants following consumption (2).

However, the impact of alternative sweeteners on metabolic processes and their effects on blood coagulation in patients with prediabetes-a population at increased risk-has not been systematically studied. In this planned interventional study, 80 patients meeting laboratory criteria for prediabetes will be randomly assigned to one of four groups, each receiving a different intervention for two weeks: saccharin, sucralose, erythritol, or a control group receiving water. The doses reflect the acceptable daily intake or known doses that are considered safe.

After enrollment, participants will visit the study center 2 times: before starting the intervention and after completing the intervention. During these visits, biological samples such as blood, urine, and stool will be collected to study metabolism, gut bacteria, immune and blood cell function. Tests will include an oral glucose tolerance test, coagulation tests, and additional blood analyses. Additionally, participants will wear a glucose monitor to track blood sugar fluctuations during the intervention.

The investigators hypothesize that consumption of alternative sweeteners negatively affects blood sugar regulation and insulin sensitivity in patients with prediabetes. Furthermore, this study will explore how the candidate sweeteners influence the gut microbiome, blood cells and other metabolic factors in this population.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Saccharin GroupActive comparatorDietary Supplement: SaccharinIntervention: Saccharin
Sucralose GroupActive comparatorDietary Supplement: SucraloseIntervention: Sucralose
Erythritol GroupActive comparatorDietary Supplement: ErythritolIntervention: Erythritol
Control GroupPlacebo comparatorDietary Supplement: VehicleIntervention: Vehicle
  • Saccharin (Dietary supplement): Participants in the saccharin group will consume 5 mg/kg body weight of saccharin daily, dissolved in 500 mL of water. This corresponds to the maximum recommended daily intake as determined by EFSA and JECFA (the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives).
  • Sucralose (Dietary supplement): Participants in the sucralose group will consume 15 mg/kg body weight of sucralose daily in 500 mL of water, representing the maximum recommended daily intake.
  • Erythritol (Dietary supplement): Those in the erythritol group will consume 0.5 g/kg body weight of erythritol daily in 500 mL of water, a dose considered safe and below levels that cause digestive discomfort (European Food Safety Authority \[EFSA\], 2023).
  • Vehicle (Dietary supplement): Participants in the control group (vehicle) will receive a vehicle consisting of 500 mL unsweetened lemon soda

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change of glucose tolerance [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Measured by AUC of oral glucose tolerance test

Secondary outcomes

  • Change of microbiome [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: RNA-Sequencing of stool samples
  • Flow cytometry analysis of changes in frequency of circulating monocyte subsets (%) [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Measured by flow cytometry in isolated PBMCs (Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells) using specific antibodies with binding to CD45, CD14, CD15 and CD16 to define monocyte subsets. Values will be reported as percent of CD45+ leukocytes
  • Flow cytometry analysis of changes in platelet activation marker expression (% positive platelets) [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Whole blood samples will be analyzed using flow cytometry. Platelets will be detected based on size and using well-established surface markers (CD41). Activation markers will be assessed (CD62P and PAC1) and reported as percent of positive cells.
  • Flow cytometry analysis of changes in platelet activation marker expression (MFI) [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Whole blood samples will be analyzed using flow cytometry. Platelets will be detected based on size and using well-established surface markers (CD41). Activation markers will be assessed (CD62P and PAC1) and reported as mean fluorescence intensity.
  • Changes in lipid profile [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Serum analysis of Total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides
  • Changes in blood metabolite profiles by liquid chromatography / mass spectrometry [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Untargeted metabolomics analysis of plasma samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Data will be reported as relative ion intensity changes from baseline (log2 fold change, mean ± SD) for significantly altered features.
  • Changes in body mass index (BMI) [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: To observe changes in anthropometric measures. Measurement of height in meters and weight in kilograms to calculate body mass index (BMI = weight/height\^2) in kg/m\^2
  • Changes in waist to hip ratio (WHR) [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: To observe changes in anthropometric measures. Measurement of waist circumference and hip circumference to calculate waist-to-hip-ratio WHR (waist circumference divided by hip circumference).
  • Changes in body fat percentage [Baseline vs. within 1 week after intervention]: Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Presence of prediabetes (HbA1c 5.7-6.4% or glucose after oral glucose tolerance test 140 to 199 mg/dL)
* Written informed consent available

Exclusion Criteria:

* Inability to communicate sufficiently in the required language
* Dementia or other significantly cognitively impairing condition
* Current pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Other severe internal, neurological, or psychiatric condition
* History of gout
* History of gallstones / diagnosis of cholelithiasis

+Publications

  • Witkowski M, Wilcox J, Province V, Wang Z, Nemet I, Tang WHW, Hazen SL. Ingestion of the Non-Nutritive Sweetener Erythritol, but Not Glucose, Enhances Platelet Reactivity and Thrombosis Potential in Healthy Volunteers-Brief Report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024 Sep;44(9):2136-2141. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321019. Epub 2024 Aug 8. PMID 39114916
  • Suez J, Cohen Y, Valdes-Mas R, Mor U, Dori-Bachash M, Federici S, Zmora N, Leshem A, Heinemann M, Linevsky R, Zur M, Ben-Zeev Brik R, Bukimer A, Eliyahu-Miller S, Metz A, Fischbein R, Sharov O, Malitsky S, Itkin M, Stettner N, Harmelin A, Shapiro H, Stein-Thoeringer CK, Segal E, Elinav E. Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance. Cell. 2022 Sep 1;185(18):3307-3328.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.016. Epub 2022 Aug 19. PMID 35987213