TrialReader


Efficacy of Different Drugs to Control Post Root Canal Treatment Pain

NCT02417337 — Phase 2, Completed, 185 participants, University of Khartoum

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Efficacy of Pain Control Following Root Canal Treatment Using Paracetamol Alone and in Combination With Three Different Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Analgesics

RegistryNCT02417337, acronym NSAID
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment185 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of Khartoum (Other)
ConditionsPain, Postoperative Pain, Irreversible Pulpitis
InterventionsParacetamol, Ibuprofen, Mefenamic Acid, Diclofenac, Placebo (Drug, other)
Datesstart 2012-08-01, primary completion 2014-08-01, completion 2015-01-01, first posted 2015-04-15, last updated 2026-08-10
Locations1 site in Sudan

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Pain All trials for Postoperative Pain All trials of Paracetamol All trials of Ibuprofen

-Summary

Root canal therapy will ideally eliminate post-endodontic pain but occasionally analgesics are needed to diminish the pain \[Owatz et al 2007\]. Development of pain after completion of root canal treatment may undermine patients' confidence in the procedure and the clinician \[Albashaireh and Alnegrish 1998\]. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are one of the most frequently taken analgesic medications for dental pain. Their popularity attributed to their efficacy in relieving pain and fever and low side effect profile at therapeutic doses \[Attar et al 2008\]. Mono-therapy analgesic has a low effect on dental pain. Improvement was performance by combining analgesics with different mechanisms of action without raising any adverse effects \[Mehlisch 2002\], was effective in controlling moderate to severe pain. The combination of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and paracetamol has shown additive analgesia for treating dental pain in several studies \[Breivik et al1999, Keiser and Hargreaves 2002\]. Endodontic treatment with a lower prevalence of postoperative pain is usually the treatment of choice.There have been no controlled dental studies evaluating the additive effects of combining a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with paracetamol. Breivik et al1999 \& Menhinick et al 2004 found that a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen was more effective than ibuprofen alone in managing postoperative pain \[Breivik et al1999 \& Menhinick et al 2004\]. Aim of the present study, to evaluate the efficacy of the paracetamol when used alone and in combinations with three groups of drugs to control postoperative endodontic pain.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Background: Management of pain is challenging part of dental treatment; sometimes pain is a major postoperative symptom after many dental procedures especially for endodontics. The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to investigate the efficacy of using paracetamol alone and three combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with paracetamol, to control postoperative endodontic pain.

Methodology: 185 patients who had anterior or premolar teeth with irreversible pulpitis without any signs and symptoms of apical periodontitis and with moderate to severe pain. Patients were divided by allocation randomization into five groups. Four experimental groups receiving different medication; group I (single dose of paracetamol); group II (ibuprofen / paracetamol); group III (mefenamic acid /paracetamol), group IV (diclofenac k / paracetamol) and group V (no medication group). The groups received the medication after the first appointment where the pulp removed, and canals fully prepared. Pain intensity was scored by using both verbal rating scale (VRS-4) and numerical rating scale (NRS-11). The pain scores were recorded before the initial endodontic therapy for up to 8 hours postoperatively. Sign test used for comparing pain score before and after treatment. This randomized control clinical trial was conducted on patients who were considered potential candidates if they had moderate to severe spontaneous pain of odontogenic origin (ranging from 4-10 score based on the numerical rating scale (NRS-11)). Patients were selected from those attending the Conservative dentistry clinics in both the University and the Teaching Hospital Emergency Clinic.

The medications were prepared in the laboratories of faculty of Pharmacy. Four groups of medications were prepared and a placebo as follows; Group I: paracetamol 1000mg Group II: ibuprofen 600mg + paracetamol 1000mg, Group III: Mefenamic acid 500mg + Paracetamol 1000mg Group IV: Diclofenac K 50mg + paracetamol 1000 mg Group V: Placebo

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Group IActive comparatorDrug: Paracetamolparacetamol 1000mg
Group IIExperimentalDrug: Paracetamol; Drug: Ibuprofenibuprofen 600mg + paracetamol 1000mg,
Group IIIExperimentalDrug: Paracetamol; Drug: Mefenamic AcidMefenamic acid 500mg + Paracetamol 1000mg
Group IVExperimentalDrug: Paracetamol; Drug: DiclofenacDiclofenac K 50mg + paracetamol 1000 mg
Group VOtherOther: PlaceboPlacebo, no medication
  • Paracetamol (Drug), also known as Acetaminophen: NSAID
  • Ibuprofen (Drug), also known as isobutylphenyl propanoic acid: NSAID
  • Mefenamic Acid (Drug), also known as Fenamate: NSAID
  • Diclofenac (Drug), also known as Voltaren: NSAID
  • Placebo (Other), also known as no medication: empty double gelatinous capsules, having similar weight and appearance of the medications

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Pain Scores Before and After 8 Hours of Treatment Per Group on the VRS-4 Scale [8 hours]: Pain was recorded in the verbal rating scale-4 (VRS-4 scale) before and after 8 hours of medication. The VRS-4 Scale has four categories of pain scores: no pain is the minimum (better outcome), slight pain, moderate pain, and severe pain score is the maximum (worse outcome).
  • Pain Score on Numerical Rating Scale of Pain (NRS-11) [8 hours]: (NRS-11) numerical rating scale of pain between 0 (better) and 10 (worse) before and after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  • Mean of Pain Reduction Stratified by Sex and Jaw Type on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) [8 hours]: Numerical rating scale (NRS-11), (0 better/the least pain score to 10 worse/the maximum pain score), , was done for sex (male or female) and jaw type (maxilla or mandible)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 60 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Spontaneous pain moderate to severe on the verbal rating scale (VRS-4), ranging from 4-10 score based on the numerical rating scale (NRS-11).
2. Adult patients presented for emergency endodontic treatment with a symptomatic maxillary or mandibular tooth (anterior and premolar) with a pulpal diagnosis of Irreversible pulpitis and normal periapex.
3. Patient choose to have root canal treatment for pain of endodontic origin.
4. The patient presented with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II medical history (ASA 1963).
5. The patient had read and thoroughly understood the pain score level sheet

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients below 18 years of age;
2. Analgesic taken within the last 4 hours;
3. History of allergy to NSAIDs, paracetamol or local anaesthetics;
4. History of uncontrolled systemic disease \[gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, oesophageal reflux, active asthma, decreased hepatic function, haemorrhagic disorders, or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus\].
5. Patients currently taking opioids, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, carbamazepine, diuretics, or anticoagulants;
6. There was history of opioid addiction or abuse; and
7. Pregnant or nursing female patients.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup V
Started3737373737
Completed3433343534
Not completed34323

Outcome results

  • Pain Scores Before and After 8 Hours of Treatment Per Group on the VRS-4 Scale (Primary), Count of participants, Participants: Group I 0; Group II 0; Group III 0; Group IV 0; Group V 0 (p 0.771)
  • Pain Score on Numerical Rating Scale of Pain (NRS-11) (Primary), Median, score on a scale: Group I 8 (0 to 10); Group II 8 (0 to 10); Group III 8 (0 to 10); Group IV 8 (0 to 10); Group V 8 (0 to 10) (p 0.000)
  • Mean of Pain Reduction Stratified by Sex and Jaw Type on Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Group I 3.8 (0 to 10); Group II 1 (0 to 10); Group III 0.4 (0 to 10); Group IV 0.43 (0 to 10); Group V 1.94 (0 to 10) (p 0.000)

Adverse events

Time frame: 2 years

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Group I0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)
Group II0/33 (0.0%)0/33 (0.0%)0/33 (0.0%)
Group III0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)
Group IV0/35 (0.0%)0/35 (0.0%)0/35 (0.0%)
Group V0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)0/34 (0.0%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup V
Gastrointestinal disorders0/340/330/340/350/34

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIGroup IVGroup V
GIT symptomsGastrointestinal disorders0/340/330/340/350/34

Limitations and caveats: One limitation was the time frame for the analysis of pain; more information would have been available if there were a 24-hour outcome line

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Khartoum, Faculty of Dentistry,KhartoumSudan

+Publications

  • Results publication: Owatz CB, Khan AA, Schindler WG, Schwartz SA, Keiser K, Hargreaves KM. The incidence of mechanical allodynia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2007 May;33(5):552-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.023. Epub 2007 Mar 6. PMID 17437870
  • Results publication: Albashaireh ZS, Alnegrish AS. Postobturation pain after single- and multiple-visit endodontic therapy. A prospective study. J Dent. 1998 Mar;26(3):227-32. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00006-7. PMID 9594474
  • Results publication: Attar S, Bowles WR, Baisden MK, Hodges JS, McClanahan SB. Evaluation of pretreatment analgesia and endodontic treatment for postoperative endodontic pain. J Endod. 2008 Jun;34(6):652-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 Apr 2. PMID 18498882
  • Results publication: Mehlisch DR. The efficacy of combination analgesic therapy in relieving dental pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Jul;133(7):861-71. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0300. PMID 12148679
  • Results publication: Breivik EK, Barkvoll P, Skovlund E. Combining diclofenac with acetaminophen or acetaminophen-codeine after oral surgery: a randomized, double-blind single-dose study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Dec;66(6):625-35. doi: 10.1053/cp.1999.v66.103629001. PMID 10613619
  • Results publication: Keiser K, Hargreaves K.Building effective strategies for the management of endodontic pain. Endodontic Topics, Volume 3, Issue 1, pages 93-105, November 2002
  • Results publication: Menhinick KA, Gutmann JL, Regan JD, Taylor SE, Buschang PH. The efficacy of pain control following nonsurgical root canal treatment using ibuprofen or a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Int Endod J. 2004 Aug;37(8):531-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00836.x. PMID 15230906
  • Results publication: Elzaki WM, Abubakr NH, Ziada HM, Ibrahim YE. Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of Efficiency of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs in the Control of Post-endodontic Pain. J Endod. 2016 Jun;42(6):835-42. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Apr 12. PMID 27080115

+Investigators

My Notes