Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Acetazolamide Versus Metolazone as an Adjunct to Standard Therapy in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

NCT07199088 — Not applicable, Recruiting, 320 participants, University of Health Sciences Lahore

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT07199088
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment320 (Estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Health Sciences Lahore (Other)
ConditionsAcute Decompensated Heart Failure, Heart Failure, Diastolic, Heart Failure, Systolic
InterventionsAcetazolamide, Metolazone (Other)
Datesstart 2025-10-11 (estimated), primary completion 2026-10-16 (estimated), completion 2026-10-30 (estimated), first posted 2025-09-30, last updated 2025-10-03
Locations1 site in Pakistan

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure All trials for Heart Failure, Diastolic All trials of Acetazolamide All trials of Metolazone

-Summary

This clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of acetazolamide versus metolazone as adjunctive treatments to standard therapy in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). ADHF is a life-threatening condition, and current treatments often involve loop diuretics to alleviate volume overload. This study will assess the added benefit of acetazolamide and metolazone in improving decongestion, reducing hospital stays, and preventing complications such as renal dysfunction or electrolyte imbalances. Participants will be randomized to receive either acetazolamide or metolazone in addition to standard diuretic therapy. The trial will evaluate primary outcomes including successful decongestion, in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay, with secondary outcomes focusing on renal function, electrolyte disturbances, and overall safety. The study is conducted at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, and aims to provide valuable insights into the management of ADHF, especially in the Pakistani population.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Acetazolamide + Standard TherapyExperimentalOther: AcetazolamideParticipants in this group will receive acetazolamide (500 mg/day) as an adjunct to standard heart failure therapy, which includes intravenous loop diuretics (Furosemide 80 mg/day). This group aims to assess the efficacy and safety of acetazolamide in improving decongestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Metolazone GroupActive comparatorOther: MetolazoneParticipants in this group will receive metolazone (5 mg/day) as an adjunct to standard heart failure therapy, including intravenous loop diuretics (Furosemide 80 mg/day). This group serves as a comparison to the acetazolamide group, evaluating the efficacy and safety of metolazone in improving decongestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
  • Acetazolamide (Other): A carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, 500 mg orally once a day as an adjunct to loop diuretics for enhancing diuresis and improving decongestion in ADHF patients.
  • Metolazone (Other): A thiazide-like diuretic, 5 mg orally once a day as an adjunct to loop diuretics for enhancing diuresis and improving decongestion in ADHF patients.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Successful Decongestion [72 hours after randomization (following 3 days of treatment with the assigned adjunct therapy).]: This outcome measure assesses the resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), specifically the absence of orthopnea, reduced jugular venous distention (JVD) to <8 cm H2O, and minimal or no peripheral edema. Successful decongestion is considered when these signs are resolved within 72 hours of intervention.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Aged 18 years or older.
* Diagnosed with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF), with either preserved or reduced ejection fraction (EF).
* At least one clinical sign of volume overload, such as:
* Pleural effusion (confirmed by chest X-ray or ultrasound).
* Oedema or ascites (verified by abdominal ultrasonography).
* Plasma NT-proBNP level > 1000 pg/mL or BNP level > 250 ng/mL at screening.
* Receiving at least 40 mg of furosemide as oral maintenance therapy for at least one month prior to the study initiation.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Previous use of acetazolamide or metolazone prior to the study period.
* Known hypersensitivity or allergies to the study drugs (acetazolamide or metolazone) or their components.
* Patients with electrolyte disturbances, especially hypokalemia.
* End-stage renal disease requiring dialysis or GFR < 20 mL/min/1.73 m².
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* Severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) or other significant comorbidities like congenital cardiac illness requiring surgery.
* Patients requiring renal replacement therapy during the hospitalization.
* History of significant electrolyte imbalances or acid-base disturbances.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Quaid e Azam Medical College , bahawalpurChak Four Hundred Fifty-four, Punjab ProvincePakistanRecruiting