Mind-Body Intervention in Glioma Couples

NCT03244995 — Not applicable, Active not recruiting, 74 participants, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

An Online Dyadic Mind-Body Intervention for Glioma Patients and Their Partners

RegistryNCT03244995
StatusActive not recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, supportive care
Enrollment74 (Actual)
SponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Other); collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ConditionsGlioblastoma, Low Grade Glioma, Malignant Glioma, Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Brain, Partner, WHO Grade III Glioma
InterventionsMind-Body Intervention Procedure, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration (Procedure, other)
Datesstart 2017-08-06, primary completion 2028-12-31 (estimated), completion 2028-12-31 (estimated), first posted 2017-08-10, last updated 2026-08-12
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Glioblastoma All trials for Low Grade Glioma All trials of Mind-Body Intervention Procedure All trials of Quality-of-Life Assessment

-Summary

This trial studies how well a couple-based mind body program works in improving spiritual, psychosocial, and physical quality of life in patients with high or low grade glioma or tumors that have spread to the brain and their partners. A couple-based mind body program may help to improve spiritual well-being, sleep difficulties, depressive symptoms, and overall quality of life in patients with glioma or tumors that have spread to the brain and their partners.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Examine the feasibility of the couple-based mind-body (CBMB) program in patients with high grade glioma (HGG) and their partners.

II. Establish the initial efficacy of the CBMB program in patients and their partners regarding spiritual (primary), psychological and physical quality of life (QOL) (secondary) outcomes relative to a waitlist control (WLC) group.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Explore potential mediation (i.e., mindfulness, compassion, holding back, and intimacy) and moderation (e.g., baseline medical, demographic and psychosocial factors) effects of the intervention.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I (CBMB PROGRAM): Patients undergo CBMB program consisting of 4-5 deep-breathing and meditation exercise sessions over 60 minutes and 2 weekly telephone calls over 15 minutes for 6 weeks. Patients also complete questionnaires regarding health, mood, sleeping habits, relationship, health care, work productivity, and quality of life.

GROUP II (WAITLIST CONTROL): Patients complete questionnaires as in Group I. Patients may undergo CBMB program after completion of study.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at 3 months.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Group I (CBMB program)ExperimentalProcedure: Mind-Body Intervention Procedure; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergo CBMB program consisting of 4-5 deep-breathing and meditation exercise sessions over 60 minutes and 2 weekly telephone calls over 15 minutes for 6 weeks. Patients also complete questionnaires regarding health, mood, sleeping habits, relationship, health care, work productivity, and quality of life.
Group II (waitlist control)Active comparatorOther: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients complete questionnaires as in Group I. Patients may undergo CBMB program after completion of study.
  • Mind-Body Intervention Procedure (Procedure), also known as Mind-Body Interventions, Mind-Body Medicine: Undergo CBMB program
  • Quality-of-Life Assessment (Other), also known as Quality of Life Assessment: Ancillary studies
  • Questionnaire Administration (Other): Ancillary studies

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Feasibility of couple-based mind-body program (CBMB) as determined by overall accrual [Up to 6 weeks]: Trial considered feasible if 50% of eligible couples consent. Will calculate rates, frequencies, and 90% confidence intervals (CIs), as applicable.
  • Feasibility of CBMB program as determined by attrition [Up to 6 weeks]: Trial considered feasible if 80% of enrolled couples complete T1 and T2 assessments. Will calculate rates, frequencies, and 90% CIs, as applicable.
  • Feasibility of CBMB program as determined by adherence [Up to 6 weeks]: Trial considered feasible if 50% of all sessions are attended. Will calculate rates, frequencies, and 90% CIs, as applicable.
  • Feasibility of CBMB program as determined by acceptability [Up to 6 weeks]: Trial considered feasible if > 75% of patients in the CBMB group rate the intervention as acceptable. Will calculate rates, frequencies, and 90% CIs, as applicable.
  • CBMB program efficacy [Up to 6 weeks]: Will calculate effect sizes for pairwise between-group comparisons of intervention outcomes at T2. Will test for between-group differences in the change of scores between T1 and T2 using analysis of variance.

Other outcomes

  • CBMB program efficacy on quality of life (QOL) outcomes [Up to 3 months after completion of study]: Will examine treatment mediators and moderators. Will examine if treatment efficacy on QOL outcomes measured at T3 is potentially achieved through improved mindfulness, self-compassion, holding back and intimacy measured at T2 using linear regression analysis in both a and b paths. Ninety percent bootstrap CIs will be constructed to assess the significance of the indirect effects defined using the product-of-coefficient approach. Linear regression analysis or multi-level modeling will be used to test for the interaction effects between treatment and baseline mindfulness, self-compassion, holding back and intimacy, as well as baseline medical and demographic factors (i.e., sex, age, and Karnofsky performance status), each at a two-sided significance level of 0.1.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* PATIENT ONLY: Patients with a diagnosis of HGG or low grade glioma (LGG), based on radiographic or pathologic diagnosis of grade III or IV listed in the medical records, or patients with a malignancy that has metastasized to the brain
* PATIENT ONLY: Patients must be within 1 month of initiating or having undergone any type of cancer treatment (i.e., surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy)
* PATIENT ONLY: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 80 or above
* PATIENT ONLY: Having a spouse/romantic partner (including same-sex) and who is willing to participate
* PATIENT \& PARTNER: Able to read and speak English
* PATIENT \& PARTNER: Able to provide informed consent
* PATIENT \& PARTNER: Have access to internet connectivity

Exclusion Criteria:

* PATIENT ONLY: Regularly (self-defined) participation in psychotherapy or a formal cancer support group
* PATIENT ONLY: Cognitive deficits that would impede the completion of self-report instruments as deemed by the clinical team

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
M D Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TexasUnited States

+Investigators