Gender Affirming Mastectomy Analgesia Rial

NCT07861165 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 64 participants, Nova Scotia Health Authority

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Paravertebral Versus Wide Local Infiltration for Analgesia Following Gender Affirming Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

RegistryNCT07861165, acronym GAMA
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment64 (Estimated)
SponsorNova Scotia Health Authority (Other)
ConditionsGender Affirming Surgery, Mastectomy, Acute Pain
InterventionsParavertebral (single injection), Wide local infiltration (Procedure)
Datesstart 2027-01-01 (estimated), primary completion 2029-08-01 (estimated), completion 2029-11-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-10-06, last updated 2026-10-06
Locations1 site in Canada

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Gender Affirming Surgery All trials for Mastectomy All trials of Paravertebral (single injection) All trials of Wide local infiltration

-Summary

Introduction:

Optimizing pain management after gender-affirming mastectomy (removal of breast tissue, aka top surgery) surgery is important for recovery and minimizing opioid use. While paravertebral nerve blocks (numbing the chest wall through injections near the spine) and injection of local anesthetic ("skin freezing") are two commonly used methods, it's not clear which of these techniques is best among patients seeking gender-affirming care. Previous studies on nerve blocks in breast surgery have mostly concentrated on patients having breast cancer removed. Studies show that paravertebral blocks are superior to skin freezing in breast cancer surgery. However, it has not been established whether this reduces long-term pain and works similarly in gender-affirming top surgery. This study aims to compare the how well nerve blocks work comparing to skin freezing for pain and opioid use after surgery.

Research question:

Does the use of paravertebral nerve blocks, as compared to skin freezing (aka wide local infiltration), reduce need for opioid use within the first 24 hours following gender-affirming mastectomy?

Hypothesis:

The investigators hypothesize that paravertebral nerve blocks are superior to wide local infiltration in terms of reduced need for opioid consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours for gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM) patients.

Methodology:

This randomized control trial will include adult patients undergoing GAM. The patients will be randomly placed into the either the nerve block group or the skin freezing group. Patients who are in the skin freezing group will also be sent to the block room where they will receive ultrasound and pressure to mimic the feeling of receiving a block. Pain will be measured using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, and opioid use will be recorded at 24-, 48-, and 72-hours post-op. Given that most patient leave hospital on the same day, participants will complete a pain journal at home and will be emailed an electronic survey to submit their results. Quality of recovery will be measured at 3 days after surgery. A follow-up survey at 3 months will assess longer term pain using the Brief Pain Inventory. Phone calls to complete the survey with a member of the research team can be done by request.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

In Canada, there has been a rise in the number of transgender and gender-diverse individuals seeking gender-affirming care in recent years. Canada has seen roughly a ten-fold increase in gender-affirming care referrals over the past decade.

A gender-affirming mastectomy (GAM), also called top surgery, is one potential intervention for trans men and non-binary individuals. This procedure entails bilateral mastectomy with chest contouring to create a masculine-appearing chest. This operation is life-changing for many as it can alleviate gender dysphoria and improve mental health and quality of life.

A significant clinical issue in GAM is postoperative pain management. These procedures involve large incisions across the chest and tissue excision, and as such, pain can be significant. With only a few other studies focused on our target population, evidence on effective pain management strategies in this population is limited, and many nerve block types have not been studied.

A wide body of research focuses on nerve block use for oncological mastectomies. Network metanalysis has recognized continuous paravertebral nerve blocks as the most effective regional anesthesia technique, while wound infiltration is only slightly better than no intervention. Oncological research recognizes the ability of continuous paravertebral nerve blocks to provide prolonged analgesia and decrease opioid consumption. That said, there are some concerns about directly applying this knowledge to individuals having a mastectomy due to gender-affirming purposes. Patients undergoing GAM are often young and healthy without comorbidities that many breast cancer patients have. Additionally, many breast cancer patients undergo axillary lymph node dissection, which can increase post-operative pain There is also research that indicates that chronic testosterone administration, which applies to much of this population, increases pain thresholds, which could have potential impacts on the analgesic requirements for these patients. Many seeking mastectomies due to gender-affirming purposes have a positive outlook on the operation in comparison to patients having a mastectomy due to breast cancer. This may alter their pain perception. Notably, some research indicates stressors, such as those caused by gender dysphoria, may exacerbate pain. These differences between the patient populations' pain profiles make this research necessary to better understand this supplemental analgesia technique in gender-affirming care.

Primary Study Objective The primary objective is to determine whether paravertebral nerve blocks are superior to wide local infiltration in terms of decreased opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents) in the first 24 postoperative hours for people undergoing GAM.

Secondary Objectives

Determine whether paravertebral nerve blocks are superior to wide local infiltration after GAM for:

* Average pain score in the first 24 hours
* Time in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
* Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in PACU
* Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) at 3 days
* EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) at 3 days and 3 months
* Persistent postsurgical pain (brief pain inventory) at 3 months
* Postoperative complications with first 7 postoperative days

Research questions RQ1: Does the use of paravertebral nerve blocks, as compared to wide local infiltration, reduce opioid consumption within the first 24 hours following gender-affirming mastectomy? RQ2: What is the trajectory of pain and opioid use in the 72 hours following gender-affirming mastectomy? RQ3: Does the use of paravertebral nerve blocks, as compared to wide local infiltration, improve other postoperative patient centered outcomes (pain at 24 hours, PONV, QoR-15, EQ-5D, long-term pain)?

Methods This study will include patients undergoing gender affirming bilateral mastectomy at the QEII Health Sciences Center in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Number of participants The study will include a maximum of 64 participants, randomly assigned to 2 study arms of 32 participants (paravertebral or wide local infiltration). The patients will be consented and screened at least 1 day before their surgery.

Randomization and concealment Patients who have consented to the study, will be randomly assigned into two groups. A computer-generated online randomization software will be used to randomize patients on a 1:1 basis to the paravertebral block (PVB) or the wide local infiltration (WLI) groups. The patient will either receive a paravertebral nerve block by anesthesiology in the block room versus wide local infiltration by the surgeon. Patients randomized to the PVB group will receive the block as per protocol, while those in the WLI group will undergo simulated block procedures using ultrasound and applied pressure to mimic the experience. The study data will be analyzed as per intention-to-treat.

Standardized Anesthesia technique Intravenous access and monitors typical at our institution including peripheral intravenous cannula(s), temperature probe and standard Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS) monitors (electrocardiography, pulse oximeter, and non-invasive blood pressure) will be applied. Induction and maintenance medication will be left to the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist with some exceptions. Lidocaine infusions will not be permitted in study patients. These medications are rarely used intraoperatively in plastic surgery and may increase the risk of LAST if given near the time of a block. Opioid administration intraoperatively and postoperatively will be administered at the discretion of the treating team. Use of intravenous dexamethasone will be encouraged unless contraindicated.

Postoperative care The standard of care for pain management for this patient population is opioid based (fentanyl, morphine, hydromorphone) with acetaminophen. The opioid medications are ordered as intermittent doses either injected intravenously, subcutaneously or ingested orally in the PACU. Codeine prescriptions will not be permitted due to their inconsistent conversion to morphine.

Regardless of group allocation, patients will receive all the usual pain medications they normally would in the postoperative period.

Data collection procedure Baseline data

A research coordinator (RC) will collect the baseline data as outlined below at the time of recruitment to the study:

* Age, sex assigned by birth, self-identified gender, body mass index (BMI), preoperative pain medication, comorbidities (respiratory disease, cardiac disease, kidney disease, liver disease, prior stroke, seizure disorders)
* Pre-existing pain (Brief pain inventory)
* Cannabis use within the last month on average (route (inhaled versus ingested), frequency, dose). Routine or high dose cannabis use is known to be associated with high postoperative pain scores.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) classification.
* Testosterone dosing and route (if applicable)

Postoperative data Participants will be provided with a journal to track their postoperative data. Then at 3 days, 7 days, and 3 months participants will be emailed a survey hosted on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) to share their recovery.

Any patient that would prefer to have the surveys completed over the phone can request this and a member of the research team will call them on day 1, 2, 3, and 7; then 3 months post operatively. Survey responses can be stored in the patient's pain journal for questions that would have been asked at earlier timeframes (e.g., 24 hours) to match the data collected from the those completing the surveys online.

Statistical analysis Primary and secondary analyses Numerical outcomes from RQ1 and RQ3 will be tested using a Welch t-tests with condition as a predictor of various outcomes (24hr opioid use, 24hr pain, QoR-15, EQ-5D, and persistent pain at 3 months). The categorical outcome (PONV) will be analyzed using a chi-squared test of independence. Trajectories of pain and opioids over the first 72hrs (RQ2) will be analyzed using linear mixed models; the investigators will explore both linear and quadratic models for rates of change over time. Linear mixed models will be used in a similar fashion to assess trajectories of change in gender congruence at 4 time points (baseline, day 3, day 7, and 3 months).

In all cases, the investigators will include all patients as an intention-to-treat protocol, using data when it is available for each outcome (even if data is missing from other outcomes). To address missing data, multiple imputation will be used, as it is a gold standard method for handing missingness.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Wide local infiltration (WLI)Active comparatorProcedure: Wide local infiltrationLocal anesthetic placed by the surgeon
Paravertebral (PVB)ExperimentalProcedure: Paravertebral (single injection)Paravertebral block placed by anesthesiologist under ultrasound
  • Paravertebral (single injection) (Procedure): The regional anesthesiologist or fellow will place the paravertebral nerve block in the block room. The patient will be placed in prone position. Before any nerve block, a subcutaneous injection of lidocaine 1% is performed to numb the skin before insertion of the block needle. The block will be US-guided, using a 22g echogenic block needle to deliver a total of 20ml of ropivacaine 0.5% on each side into the paravertebral space. The paravertebral space will be identified by visualizing the transverse processes, the associated ribs, the costotransverse ligament, and observing pleural depression with injection of the local anesthetic. The level of the paravertebral block will be left to the discretion of the regional anesthesiologist (but T3-5 would be most common for anterior chest wall procedures).
  • Wide local infiltration (Procedure): Ropivacaine 0.5% is used for wide local infiltration anesthesia in the comparison group at the conclusion of the procedure. Forty ml are used in total, and approximately 5ml is injected bilaterally into each of the superomedial, superolateral (into the pectoralis major muscle fascia), inferolateral (over the drain site), and inferomedial.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Opioid consumption [24 hours]: Total opioid consumption (converted to oral morphine equivalents)

Secondary outcomes

  • Average pain score [24 hours]: Average pain score using the numerical rating scale (NRS) rated on a 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worse pain imaginable.
  • Time in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) [Time in PACU is measured from the patient entering the PACU until they are discharged to home or the hospital ward up to 12 hours. Time in PACU is approximately 2 hours on average, however longer times are possible.]: Time in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) measured in minutes
  • Rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) [Postoperative. This outcome will be assess up to 12 hours after arrival in PACU.]: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) as determined by the recovery room nurses. Documented in the chart.
  • Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) [3 days]: The quality of recovery (QoR-15) questionnaire is a patient-centered measure that includes five domains of recovery after surgery: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, and pain. Each item is graded on a eleven-point Likert scale with QoR-15 scores ranging from 0 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 150 (excellent quality of recovery).
  • EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) [3 days and 3 months]: EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a questionnaire used to measure health related quality of life across five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). The EQ-5D-3L is a version of the EQ-5D that measures each dimension across three levels of severity. The EQ-5D is scored using index value set calculators to assign a numeric value where 0 is equivalent to being dead and 1 is perfect health. It is possible to have scores that are below zero indicating a state worse than being dead.
  • Persistent postsurgical pain [3 months]: At 3 months following the procedure date, the patient will be asked about persistent post-surgical pain based on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). There are 7 pain interference items included in the BPI. Pain interference as measured by the BPI will be calculated by averaging the 7 pain interference items. Pain severity is measured by averaging 4 pain severity items. Each item is scored on an 11-point Likert scale from 0 to 10 such that the averages indicate no pain interference/severity at 0 and maximum pain interference/severity at 10.
  • Postoperative complications [7 days]: The following block related complications will be recorded: local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax, bleeding, or anaphylaxis. The following adverse event data recorded in the participant's chart will be captured by the research coordinator following 7 postoperative days: pneumonia, respiratory failure, wound infection, sepsis, arrhythmias, readmission to hospital, and hospital mortality. Complications will be categorized by severity using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification: nonfatal complications will be defined as minor (CD level I and II) and major (CD level III and IV), and fatal complications will be categorized as CD level V. If a patient experiences more than one complication, the most severe will be used for analysis.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 19 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult (aged >18 years) patients
* Undergoing gender affirming bilateral mastectomy
* Self-identifying with gender dysphoria

Exclusion Criteria:

* Severe pre-existing liver disease (Child B or C)
* Severe kidney disease (Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 (mL/min/1·73m²))
* Severe lung disease (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale > 2)
* An allergy to ropivacaine
* Weight <50 kg
* Unable to provide valid consent to study prior to surgery
* BMI>45

Justification for exclusion criteria Patients being excluded for liver disease, kidney disease, and low weight decreases the risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Known allergy to ropivacaine (the local anesthetic used in both groups) is to avoid anaphylaxis or other serious allergic reaction. Both types of blocks have a low risk of pneumothorax (injury to the lung); hence excluding patients with severe lung disease. Higher BMI (due to excess adipose tissue) increases the difficulty of nerve blocks, which could both increase risks and decrease success rates. Inability to provide consent interferes with the consent process. While a caregiver could provide consent on behalf the patient, the patient would not be able to complete self-rated scores, which are the central outcomes of this study.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
QEII Health Sciences CentreHalifax, Nova ScotiaCanada

+Publications

  • Anger JT, Case LK, Baranowski AP, Berger A, Craft RM, Damitz LA, Gabriel R, Harrison T, Kaptein K, Lee S, Murphy AZ, Said E, Smith SA, Thomas DA, Valdes Hernandez MDC, Trasvina V, Wesselmann U, Yaksh TL. Pain mechanisms in the transgender individual: a review. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 27;5:1241015. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1241015. eCollection 2024. PMID 38601924
  • Singh NP, Makkar JK, Kuberan A, Guffey R, Uppal V. Efficacy of regional anesthesia techniques for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing major oncologic breast surgeries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2022 Apr;69(4):527-549. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02183-z. Epub 2022 Jan 31. PMID 35102494
  • Katsnelson G, Brenna CTA, Giron-Arango L, Abdallah YM, Brull R. Analgesic benefits of regional anesthesia in the perioperative management of transition-related surgery: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 May 6;50(5):441-448. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105479. PMID 38719225
  • Gran I, Kamali A, Granath F, Frisen L, Lindqvist EK, Dhejne C, Sommar P, Sackey H. Improved health-related quality of life and gender congruence after gender-affirming mastectomy-a prospective cohort study. J Sex Med. 2025 Oct 5;22(10):1882-1890. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf203. PMID 40795770
  • Lane M, Kirsch MJ, Sluiter EC, Svientek SR, Hamill JB, Morrison SD, Ives GC, Alman E, Gilman RH, Kuzon WM, Cederna PS, Wilkins EG. Gender Affirming Mastectomy Improves Quality of Life in Transmasculine Patients: A Single-center Prospective Study. Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):e725-e729. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005158. Epub 2021 Aug 13. PMID 34387203
  • Sivakumar S, Kressel A, Mendonca R, Girshin M. Battle of the Blocks: Which Pain Management Technique Triumphs in Gender-Affirming Bilateral Mastectomies? J Clin Med Res. 2024 Jun;16(6):284-292. doi: 10.14740/jocmr5159. Epub 2024 Jun 18. PMID 39027810
  • Jackman L, Chan C, Garvilles M, Kamran R. Outcome measurement for gender-affirming care in Canada: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 12;15(3):e091135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091135. PMID 40074262