Frankincense Versus Sodium Hypochlorite for Root Canal Disinfection

NCT07823868 — Early Phase 1, Not yet recruiting, 30 participants, Oman Dental College

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Antibacterial Effectiveness of Frankincense-Based Herbal Irrigant Against Endodontic Microflora Using Real-Time PCR - A Randomized Clinical Trial

RegistryNCT07823868, acronym FSHRCD: RCT
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseEarly Phase 1
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment30 (Estimated)
SponsorOman Dental College (Other); collaborators: IMU University, Malaysia, Sultan Qaboos University
ConditionsPulp Necrosis, Root Canal Infection, Apical Periodontitis
InterventionsSodium hypochlorite 3%, Frankincense-based irrigant (Drug)
Datesstart 2027-01-19 (estimated), primary completion 2027-12-07 (estimated), completion 2028-05-07 (estimated), first posted 2026-09-16, last updated 2026-09-22
Locations1 site in Oman

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Pulp Necrosis All trials for Root Canal Infection All trials of Sodium hypochlorite 3% All trials of Frankincense-based irrigant

-Summary

This research study is being done to find out if a natural ingredient called frankincense can clean infected root canals as effectively as the standard cleaning solution currently used in dentistry.

When a tooth's nerve dies from infection, dentists use a strong cleaning liquid, called sodium hypochlorite, to kill bacteria inside the tooth before filling it. This liquid works well, but it can sometimes irritate the gums or taste unpleasant. Frankincense, a natural substance long used in Oman, has shown early signs in laboratory studies that it may also fight bacteria effectively, with fewer side effects.

In this study, patients needing root canal treatment for an infected, dead tooth will be randomly placed into one of two groups. One group will have their tooth cleaned with the standard liquid. The other group will have their tooth cleaned with the frankincense-based liquid. Before and after cleaning, a small, painless sample will be taken from inside the tooth to measure how much bacteria is present, using a lab test called PCR. The results from both groups will then be compared to see which cleaning liquid removes more bacteria.

Patients who are between 18 and 50 years old, and who need root canal treatment for a dead/infected tooth, may be able to join. The study involves no extra visits beyond normal root canal treatment.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial evaluating a standardized frankincense-based intracanal irrigant compared with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in patients with pulpal necrosis, conducted at Oman Dental College.

Eligible participants are adults aged 18-50 years diagnosed with pulpal necrosis (single- or multi-rooted teeth), with or without apical periodontitis. Exclusion criteria include periodontal pockets greater than 4 mm, calcified canals, acute apical abscess, internal resorption, open apex, retreatment cases, antibiotic therapy within the prior 3 months, pregnancy, and systemic comorbidities.

Thirty root canals will be enrolled and allocated 1:1 to two groups using block randomization: Group A (control) will receive standard 3% NaOCl, and Group B (intervention) will receive a standardized frankincense-based irrigant. Both irrigants will be delivered using the same standardized volume (approximately 5 mL) and activation time (30-60 seconds) to ensure the only planned difference between groups is the irrigant itself.

A pre-irrigation microbial sample will be collected from each canal using a sterile paper point, followed by irrigation with the assigned solution, and then a post-irrigation sample. Samples will be analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for total bacterial load (universal 16S rRNA) and for Enterococcus faecalis specifically. Laboratory personnel performing the qPCR analysis, and the statistician analyzing the data, will be blinded to group allocation using coded sample identifiers.

The primary outcome is the log10 reduction in total bacterial load from pre- to post-irrigation. Secondary outcomes include the percentage reduction in bacterial load between groups, the reduction in E. faecalis counts, and adverse events (e.g., tissue irritation, discomfort). Statistical analysis will use paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons, and independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons, with significance set at p<0.05

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
3% Sodium Hypochlorite (Control)Active comparatorDrug: Sodium hypochlorite 3%Participants randomized to this arm will receive standard 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation, the clinic's current standard-of-care irrigant, prepared according to institutional protocol. Approximately 5 mL of irrigant will be delivered per canal, with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation), following standardized access, minimal instrumentation, and pre-irrigation microbiological sampling. A post-irrigation sample will be taken via sterile paper point immediately after irrigation.
Frankincense-Based Herbal Irrigant (Intervention)ExperimentalDrug: Frankincense-based irrigantParticipants randomized to this arm will receive a standardized frankincense-based irrigant (Boswellia sacra-derived extract), formulated at a fixed concentration and pH, with batch sterility and endotoxin testing and stability/compatibility testing completed prior to clinical use. Approximately 5 mL of irrigant will be delivered per canal, with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation, final protocol to be fixed prior to trial start), using the same standardized volume, activation method, and contact time as the control arm, following standardized access, minimal instrumentation, and pre-irrigation microbiological sampling. A post-irrigation sample will be taken via sterile paper point immediately after irrigation.
  • Sodium hypochlorite 3% (Drug), also known as NaOCl 3%: Standard-of-care root canal irrigant used as the active comparator. A 3% aqueous sodium hypochlorite solution, prepared per institutional protocol, delivered at approximately 5 mL per canal with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation).
  • Frankincense-based irrigant (Drug): Investigational root canal irrigant consisting of a standardized Boswellia sacra (frankincense) extract formulation, adjusted to a fixed concentration and pH, with batch sterility and endotoxin testing and stability/compatibility testing completed prior to clinical use. Delivered at approximately 5 mL per canal with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation), matching the control arm's volume, activation method, and contact time so that the irrigant itself is the only planned difference between groups.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Reduction in Total Bacterial Load [1 hour. First sample will be taken pre-intervention/procedural (before chemo-mechanical preparation) and the second sample will be taken immediately after the intervention (after completion of chemo-mechanical preparation) in the same clinical visit.]: The change in total endodontic bacterial load, measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the universal 16S rRNA gene, calculated as log10(pre-irrigation bacterial load) minus log10(post-irrigation bacterial load). Assessed and compared between the frankincense-based irrigant group and the 3% NaOCl group.
  • Percentage Reduction in Total Bacterial Load Between Groups [This can be also referred to as Pre-procedural and post-procedural; the procedure being pulp extirpation followed by irrigation, cleaning and shaping of the rootcanals, within a single clinical visit; 1 hour. Pre-intervention & post-intervention samples]: Comparison of the percentage reduction in total bacterial load (16S rRNA qPCR) between the frankincense-based irrigant group and the 3% NaOCl group. Time Frame: Within a single clinical visit; pre- to post-irrigation

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18-50 years
* Diagnosis of pulpal necrosis (single- or multi-rooted tooth), with or without apical periodontitis
* Tooth suitable for standard endodontic access and microbiological sampling

Exclusion Criteria:

* Periodontal pockets >4 mm
* Calcified canals
* Acute apical abscess
* Internal resorption
* Open apex
* Retreatment cases
* Antibiotic/ herbal therapy within the prior 3 months
* Pregnancy
* Systemic comorbidities

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Oman dental collegeMuscatOman

+Publications

  • Gutmann JL, Manjarres V. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Microbiological Aspects of Endodontics. Dent J (Basel). 2018 Sep 22;6(4):49. doi: 10.3390/dj6040049. PMID 30249009
  • Palwankar D, Garg A, Tandan M, Bhasin P, Sachdeva A, Palwankar P. Antimicrobial efficacy of two commercially available herbal products with and without ultrasonic activation in primary endodontic infections: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):305-309. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_308_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6. PMID 38634027
  • Das A, et al. Comparative evaluation of herbal irrigants on root canal microflora: a clinical study. J Conserv Dent. 2024;27(2):120-126.
  • Almohareb RA, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of frankincense extract against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2025;37(1):45-52.
  • Di Stefano M, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Boswellia sacra essential oils. Microorganisms. 2020;8(6):984.
  • Abushouk S, Lundy F, Linden G, Abdel Hamid MM, Ibrahim Y, El Karim I. Quantitative Analysis of Candidate Endodontic Pathogens and Their Association with Cause and Symptoms of Apical Periodontitis in a Sudanese Population. Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr;6(1):50-55. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.52297. Epub 2021 Mar 3. PMID 33762533
  • Zhang D, Shen Y, de la Fuente-Nunez C, Haapasalo M. In vitro evaluation by quantitative real-time PCR and culturing of the effectiveness of disinfection of multispecies biofilms in root canals by two irrigation systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):913-920. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2515-x. Epub 2018 Jun 15. PMID 29948281
  • Swimberghe RCD, Coenye T, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2019 May;52(5):604-628. doi: 10.1111/iej.13050. Epub 2018 Dec 20. PMID 30488449
  • Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3:512-530. doi: 10.1111/iej.13677. Epub 2022 Jan 13. PMID 34958494
  • Cai C, Chen X, Li Y, Jiang Q. Advances in the Role of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant in Chemical Preparation of Root Canal Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2023 Jan 13;2023:8858283. doi: 10.1155/2023/8858283. eCollection 2023. PMID 36685672

+Study documents

+Investigators