Assessment of Six-minute Walking Distance Between Sea Level LA vs. High Altitude HA After Re-ascent in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension PAH

NCT07797166 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 20 participants, Silvia Ulrich Somaini

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Effect of a One-week Descent From 2850m to Sea Level and Re-ascent in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Healthy Controls Permanently Living > 2600m on Pulmonary Hemodynamics, Exercise Capacity, Blood Oxygenation, Sleep Disordered Breathing and Further Outcomes

RegistryNCT07797166
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, supportive care
Enrollment20 (Estimated)
SponsorSilvia Ulrich Somaini (Other)
ConditionsPulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Pulmonary Vascular Disease, Six-minute Walk Test, NYHA, High Altitude Effects, High Altitude
InterventionsRe-Ascent sea level to 2850m (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2026-09-25 (estimated), primary completion 2026-10-04 (estimated), completion 2026-12-31 (estimated), first posted 2026-09-01, last updated 2026-09-01
Locations1 site in Switzerland

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) All trials for Pulmonary Vascular Disease All trials of Re-Ascent sea level to 2850m

-Summary

To study the effect of a re-ascent after a one-week stay at sea level (after prior descent from 2850m) to high altitude (Quito Ecuador: 2850m) on six-minute walking distance and other scores in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension PAH, who live permanently >2600m.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The aim of this research is to investigate the six-minute walking distance and other scores before and after re-ascent (sea level for 7 days vs. re-ascent to 2850m) in patients with diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension according to guidelines, who permanently live at high altitude over 2600m.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Six-minute walking distance 6MWD at sea level and after re-ascent at 2850mExperimentalBehavioral: Re-Ascent sea level to 2850mAssessment of six-minute walking distance 6MWD and other scores after 7 days at sea level and after re-ascent from sea level back to 2850m by bus (in one day)
  • Re-Ascent sea level to 2850m (Behavioral): After 7 days at sea level return/re-ascent to their usual living altitude at 2850m

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Six-minute walking distance after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in six-minute walking distance 6MWD between sea level (after one-week stay) and day after re-ascent at 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Secondary outcomes

  • SpO2 at rest and end-exercise after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in SpO2 (peripheral oxygen saturation) at rest and end-exercise between sea level (after one-week stay) and Day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Heart rate at rest and end-exercise after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in heart rate at rest and end-exercise between sea level (after one-week stay) and Day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Blood pressure at rest and end-exercise after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in blood pressure at rest and end-exercise between sea level (after one-week stay) and Day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Dyspnea and leg discomfort sensation after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in dyspnea and leg discomfort sensation (assessed with BORG-CR10-Scale, Category Rating 0-10 with 10 being the most dyspnea/leg discomfort) at rest and end-exercise between sea level (after one-week stay) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • NYHA functional class after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in NYHA functional class (New York Heart Association Class I-IV, IV being the worst) at rest and end-exercise between sea level (after one-week stay) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Quality of life after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in quality of life score (EmPHasis-10: Score with 10 questions and 0-50 points, higher scores indicating poorer quality of life) between sea level (after one-week stay) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • General well-being after re-ascent to 2850m [From Day 5-7 at sea level to day after re-ascent]: Difference/change in general well-being (Visual Analog Scale 10cm: the higher, the worse) between sea level (after one-week stay) and day after re-ascent to 2850m in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Six-minute walking distance pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in six-minute walking distance (6MWD) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • SpO2 at rest and end-exercise pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in SpO2 (peripheral oxygen saturation) at rest and end-exercise at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Heart rate at rest and end-exercise pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in heart rate at rest and end-exercise at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Blood pressure at rest and end-exercise pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in blood pressure at rest and end-exercise at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Dyspnea and leg discomfort pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in dyspnea and leg discomfort (assessed with BORG-CR10-Scale, Category Rating 0-10 with 10 being the most dyspnea/leg discomfort) at rest and end-exercise at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • NYHA functional class pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in NYHA functional class (New York Heart Association Class I-IV, IV being the worst) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • Quality of life pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in quality of life (EmPHasis-10: Score with 10 questions and 0-50 points, higher scores indicating poorer quality of life) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • General well-being pre-descent to after re-ascent [Baseline at 2850m followed by a one-week stay at sea level to the day after re-ascent back to 2850m (time frame approximately 11 days)]: Difference/change in general well-being (Visual Analog Scale 10cm: the higher, the worse) at 2850m with a one-week stay at sea level in between (day pre-descent vs. day after re-ascent) in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult patients aged 18-80 years and of all genders
* Permanent residence > 2600 m
* Diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension PAH (PAHHA-Group) according to guidelines
* Patients are stable on therapy
* NYHA (new york heart association) functional class I-III.
* written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Age <18 years or >80 years
* unstable condition
* Patients who cannot follow the study investigations
* Patient permanently living < 2600m.
* Patients who traveled and stayed overnight at altitudes <2000 m in the past 4 weeks.
* Patients with moderate to severe concomitant lung disease (FEV1<70% or forced vital capacity <70%), severe parenchymal lung disease, severe smokers (>20 cigarettes/day)
* Severely hypoxemic patients at Quito permanently having persistent SpO2 (oxygen saturation by pulseoximetry) <80% on ambient air.
* Patient with a non-corrected ventricular septum defect
* Relevant concomitant other disease of the heart, kidney, liver, blood (anemia hemoglobin<11 g/dl)

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University Hospital of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

+Investigators

  • Silvia Ulrich, Principal investigator, University Hospital Zurich, Departement of Pulmonology
  • Rodrigo Hoyos, Principal investigator, Hospital Carlos Andrade Marin of Quito, Ecuador