Continuous Interscalene Blocks and Rebound Pain

NCT07770165 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 154 participants, University of Calgary

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Evaluation of the Effect of Continuous Interscalene Blocks on Rebound Pain Compared to Single-Shot Interscalene Blocks in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty : A Randomized-Controlled Trial

RegistryNCT07770165
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment154 (Estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Calgary (Other)
ConditionsTotal Shoulder Arthroplasty, Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, Interscalene Analgesia, Interscalene Blocks, Interscalene Nerve Block, Orthopedic Surgery Patients, Locoregional Anaesthesia, Rebound Pain
InterventionsContinuous interscalene nerve block, Interscalene Block (Drug)
Datesstart 2026-10-01 (estimated), primary completion 2027-05-01 (estimated), completion 2027-05-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-08-18, last updated 2026-08-19
Locations1 site in Canada

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty All trials for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty All trials of Continuous interscalene nerve block All trials of Interscalene Block

-Summary

The primary objectives of this present study are to examine whether a continuous interscalene block of a total duration of 48 hours reduces the incidence of rebound pain comparatively to single-shot interscalene block, through the evaluation of the NRS scores at rest and on movement in the postoperative period at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours as well as the total opioid consumption in the same timeframe for patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.

Rebound pain has been defined in some studies as the "the transition from well-controlled pain (numerical rating scale \[NRS\] ≤3) while the block is working to severe pain (NRS ≥7) within 24 h of block performance."

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The number of patients requiring shoulder replacements for many different indications, including osteoarthritis, cuff arthropathy and acute fractures has continually grown in the last 15 years, as suggested by a recent international meta-analysis. While there is no designated Canadian database specific to total shoulder arthroplasty compiled by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), international data suggests that the expansion of the indications for reverse total shoulder replacements has contributed to the increase in the total amount of patients that undergo such procedure, with an estimated growth of 6-15% between 2011 and 2019. Moreover, there has also been a four-fold increase in the proportion of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty cases in an ACS-NSQIP database from 2015-2019, without a notable increase in adverse patient events, highlighting a shift towards a more ambulatory approach to total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

As this procedure becomes mostly ambulatory, new challenges arise regarding the best pain management modality to limit the overall need for opioids and reduce their side effects including respiratory depression, pruritis, nausea and vomiting, as well as increasing patient satisfaction and recovery. There are multiple anesthetic techniques described in the literature to aid in multimodal analgesia, the most commonly used being the interscalene block (ISB), as a single-shot (sISB) or as a continuous infusion (cISB), often combined with multimodal analgesia with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine. Other techniques include superior trunk blocks, as well as suprascapular nerve block, often used as an alternative when respiratory complications are a major concern due to phrenic nerve blockade. Most regional analgesia techniques detailed above have shown superior pain management compared to local infiltration alone.

Although the interscalene block is clearly established as standard of care for all patients undergoing shoulder surgery, numerous studies have compared the efficacy of sISB versus catheter-based cISB, with variable results favoring either modality in terms of pain management, opioid consumption and patient-related side effects. A more recent systematic review and meta-analysis of over 1000 patients in 20 trials on the effects of single-injection vs. continuous brachial plexus blocks for shoulder surgeries on patient-reported outcomes published in June 2026 has highlighted better pain management for cISB than sISB, especially during the 12- to 48-hour period, although most of the regimens showing better analgesia also included patient-controlled boluses. Notably, mean pain at rest was lower in the cISB group, with a particular benefit in the 24-48 hour period, a period where the concept of "rebound pain" can occur with single-shot modalities.

This concept has been defined in some studies as the "the transition from well-controlled pain (numerical rating scale \[NRS\] ≤3) while the block is working to severe pain (NRS ≥7) within 24 h of block performance.", with an estimated occurrence of 49.6%. Some identified contributors were younger patients, female gender, surgery involving bone, the absence of IV dexamethasone, as well as upper limb surgery. A possible explanation relies on a "supply-vs-demand" mismatch, where the possible analgesic block could be of insufficient length compared to the patient's needs, especially in the at-risk populations. A study realized in 2007 on femoral nerve block proved that prolonging a nerve block with a catheter based infusion did reduce the apparition of rebound pain. This concept has yet to be formally evaluated in upper limb surgeries and blocks, including in total shoulder arthroplasty.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Single Shot Interscalene BlockActive comparatorDrug: Interscalene BlockThis Control Group will receive a single-shot interscalene block, which is considered one of the standard of care analgesic modality for shoulder surgery.
Continuous Interscalene BlockExperimentalDrug: Continuous interscalene nerve blockThis Interventional Group will receive a continuous interscalene block via a catheter for a duration of 48 hours with ropivacaine 0.2% at a fixed 5 mL/hour rate.
  • Continuous interscalene nerve block (Drug): This Interventional Group will receive a continuous interscalene block via a catheter for a duration of 48 hours with ropivacaine 0.2% at a fixed 5 mL/hour rate.
  • Interscalene Block (Drug): This control group will receive a single shot interscalene block with 20 mL of ropivicaine 0.2%.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • incidence of Rebound pain within 96 hours postoperatively [This outcome will be measured within 24 hours of block resolution, for up to 96 hours after the initial block realization.]: The incidence of Rebound Pain, defined as an NRS score of < 3 during an effective block to an NRS > 7 within 24 hours of block resolution. This will be analyzed as a binary variable (yes/no)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults aged >18 years of age
* ASA I-III
* Scheduled for elective ambulatory total shoulder arthroplasty.

Exclusion Criteria:

* ASA IV
* Revision surgery
* Contraindication to regional anesthesia (such as allergy to local anesthetics, systemic anticoagulation, local infection)
* Preoperative chronic pain or opioid use
* Preoperative drug dependency
* Severe respiratory disease or contralateral diaphragmatic paralysis
* Patient refusal.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
South Health CampusCalgary, AlbertaCanada

+Publications

  • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950553424000856
  • https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X20301756?via%3Dihub#bib20
  • https://www.nysora.com/regional-anesthesia/techniques/upper-extremity/intescalene/ultrasound-guided-interscalene-brachial-plexus-block/
  • https://www.ovid.com/jnls/co-anesthesiology/fulltext/10.1097/aco.0000000000000651~rebound-pain-after-regional-anesthesia-in-the-ambulatory
  • https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16583
  • https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.70249
  • Williams BA, Bottegal MT, Kentor ML, Irrgang JJ, Williams JP. Rebound pain scores as a function of femoral nerve block duration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: retrospective analysis of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.011. PMID 17543812
  • Barry GS, Bailey JG, Sardinha J, Brousseau P, Uppal V. Factors associated with rebound pain after peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4):862-871. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.10.035. Epub 2020 Dec 31. PMID 33390261
  • Rhyner P, Cachemaille M, Goetti P, Rossel JB, Boand M, Farron A, Albrecht E. Single-bolus injection of local anesthetic, with or without continuous infusion, for interscalene brachial plexus block in the setting of multimodal analgesia: a randomized controlled unblinded trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 May 7;49(5):313-319. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104681. PMID 37541683
  • Hussain N, Goldar G, Ragina N, Banfield L, Laffey JG, Abdallah FW. Suprascapular and Interscalene Nerve Block for Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017 Dec;127(6):998-1013. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001894. PMID 28968280
  • Kim HJ, Koh KH, Park JI, Kim YJ, Kim MJ, Kim H, Kim H, Ro YJ, Koh WU. Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy between Arthroscopically Placed Continuous Suprascapular Nerve Block and Ultrasound-guided Continuous Superior Trunk Block: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2023 Nov 1;139(5):591-601. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004691. PMID 37450621
  • Pai B H P, Bohaczuk S, Jinadu S, Hong J, Echevarria G, Lai YH, Chen J, Cagle PJ, Flatow EL, Rosenblatt M. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of continuous perineural catheter, liposomal bupivacaine, and dexamethasone as an adjuvant for interscalene block in total shoulder arthroplasty: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Feb;34(2):e81-e92. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.06.014. Epub 2024 Aug 27. PMID 39197650
  • Xiao M, Cohen SA, Cheung EV, Freehill MT, Abrams GD. Pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Nov;30(11):2638-2647. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.008. Epub 2021 Jul 17. PMID 34284094
  • Trudeau MT, Peters JJ, LeVasseur MR, Hawthorne BC, Dorsey CG, Wellington IJ, Shea KP, Mazzocca AD. Inpatient versus outpatient shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: A propensity score matched risk-adjusted analysis demonstrates the safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. J ISAKOS. 2022 Apr;7(2):51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 25. PMID 35546436
  • Woodmass J, Harris S, McRae S, Righolt CH, MacDonald P, Bohm E. Implementation of and findings from a regional shoulder replacement registry. Can J Surg. 2026 Mar 31;69(2):E137-E145. doi: 10.1503/cjs.014624. Print 2026 Mar-Apr. PMID 41916651
  • Rupani N, Combescure C, Silman A, Lubbeke A, Rees J. International trends in shoulder replacement: a meta-analysis from 11 public joint registers. Acta Orthop. 2024 Jun 18;95:348-357. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.40948. PMID 38888103