Comparison of Two Types of Calcium (Ca²⁺) Ionophore Treatments for Oocyte Activation in Cases of Suboptimal Fertilization Potential

NCT07570342 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 20 participants, ART Fertility Clinics LLC

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT07570342, acronym (Ca²⁺)
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, other
Enrollment20 (Estimated)
SponsorART Fertility Clinics LLC (Other)
ConditionsICSI, Testicular Sperm Extraction in Azoospermic Patients, Male Infertility, PGT-A
InterventionsGroup 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive, Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin, Group 3: Control (Other)
Datesstart 2026-04-30 (estimated), primary completion 2026-12-01 (estimated), completion 2026-12-31 (estimated), first posted 2026-05-06, last updated 2026-05-11

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for ICSI All trials for Testicular Sperm Extraction in Azoospermic Patients All trials of Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive All trials of Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin

-Summary

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) using Ca²⁺ ionophores in cases of total fertilization failure (TFF) due to oocyte activation deficiency (OAD). The study will be conducted in two phases: Phase I will compare the fertilization rates of oocytes exposed to two types of Ca²⁺ ionophore treatments- Ionomycin solution and commercially available CultActive-against a control group without calcium ionophore treatment. Phase II will assess whether an additional injection of CaCl2, prior to exposure to the chosen ionophore from Phase I, further improves fertilization outcomes. The goal is to identify the optimal AOA protocol for improving fertilization rates and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach in relation to ploidy, with a focus on ensuring normal pre-implantation embryo development.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The introduction of ICSI has significantly improved fertilization rates worldwide from 15% to 70-80% between 1996 and 2019. Despite its use, total fertilization failure (TFF) still occurs in 1-5% of cases Oocyte activation deficiency (OAD) is a primary cause of TFF, preventing mature oocytes from undergoing activation and successful fertilization. This deficiency, which can originate from either the sperm or the oocyte, is estimated to contribute directly to 40% of ICSI failures , with potentially higher indirect contributions.

As infertility and ICSI cycles continue to rise, so does the frequency of TFF and OAD. While deficiencies in oocyte-derived factors are more challenging to address and likely involve pathways downstream of sperm-induced activation, the absence of oocyte activation due to deficient sperm-derived signals has been partially overcome through assisted oocyte activation (AOA) approaches. During fertilization, oocyte activation is initiated by sperm-specific phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ), which induces Ca²⁺ oscillations within the oocyte. A disruption in this mechanism is a leading cause of fertilization failure in mammals. Some male etiologies imply deficiencies in sperm PLCζ. In particular, cases of globozoospermia, where sperm lack phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) and fail to initiate the necessary Ca2+ oscillations for fertilization, have been addressed and proven efficient with AOA. Assisted oocyte activation (AOA) approaches have been proposed as a clinical intervention and have demonstrated some success in compensating for sperm factor deficiencies, by replicating this Ca²⁺ release using mechanical, electrical, or chemical stimulation by Ca²⁺ ionophores. However, concerns regarding its non-physiological nature and incomplete understanding of Ca²⁺ signaling in fertilization limit its widespread implementation.

Ca2+ ionophores are chemical compounds that facilitate the transport of Ca²⁺ ions (Ca²⁺) across biological membranes, bypassing the cells' natural Ca²⁺ signaling mechanisms, therefore they have been applied as AOA biochemical approach. The two most used types of Ca²⁺ Ionophores, are a commercially available Ca2+ Ionophore, A23187 (also known as calcimycin, and is commercially available by Gynemed), a carboxylic antibiotic that binds and freely transports Ca2+ across all biological membranes, and Ionomycin, which is far more specific and potent for Ca²⁺ compared to A23187 and can activate and indirectly stimulate gene expression due to the activation of various Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathways. Ca2+ signalling is not only essential for nuclear processes such as fertilization mechanisms and cortical granules release, but also for cytoplasmic events such as cytoskeletal rearrangement, mitochondrial function and energy production, and a role in oxidative balance. Although several studies have been published, including a Cochrane review, there have been few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving sibling oocytes at the MII stage. Many studies have either included in vitro-matured oocytes or were of retrospective nature, which complicates the interpretation of conclusions regarding the efficacy of the optimal method. Of note, two RCTs using sibling MIIs applied A23187 with no differences in fertilization rates, and only one in Ca²⁺ using Ionomycin which resulted in better fertilization outcomes. Use of CaCl2 in combination to Ca²⁺ ionophore seems to improve outcomes in relation to fertilization without impacting birth characteristics and congenital malformations of the 47 children born. However, safety studies involving preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on embryos derived from AOA have not been conducted, with only one retrospective report available. Given that for some couples using AOA would mean a last resource to obtain available embryos and for some a significant increase on the availability of embryos, it is crucial to assess both the safety and efficacy by analyzing ploidy and identifying the optimal protocol in this context.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActiveOtherOther: Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActiveOocytes are cultured immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-CultActive dish for 15 min in CO2 incubator, then injected oocytes are rinsed well in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.
Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) IonomycinOtherOther: Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) IonomycinOocytes are placed immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-Ionomycin dish (dish 1) for 7 - 10 min in CO2 incubator, then they are rinsed well and placed in another culture dish (dish 2) for 25 min in CO2 incubator. Then MIIs are exposed again in OA-Ionomycin dish for 10 min, then they are rinsed well and placed into culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.
Group 3: ControlOtherOther: Group 3: ControlOocytes are cultured as per routine practice after injection in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in routine culture GT-culture medium.
  • Group 1: Oocyte Activation (OA) CultActive (Other): Oocytes are cultured immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-CultActive dish for 15 min in CO2 incubator, then injected oocytes are rinsed well in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.
  • Group 2: Oocyte Activation (OA) Ionomycin (Other): Oocytes are placed immediately after injection in a pre-calibrated OA-Ionomycin dish (dish 1) for 7 - 10 min in CO2 incubator, then they are rinsed well and placed in another culture dish (dish 2) for 25 min in CO2 incubator. Then MIIs are exposed again in OA-Ionomycin dish for 10 min, then they are rinsed well and placed into culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in GT-culture medium. Then transferred to the numbered droplet or well.
  • Group 3: Control (Other): Oocytes are cultured as per routine practice after injection in culture dish/ Embryoscope slide in routine culture GT-culture medium.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Fertilization rates and abnormal fertilization. [16-20 hours post-insemination/ICSI]: The primary endpoint is the proportion of metaphase II (MII) oocytes that achieve normal fertilisation (2 pronuclei; 2PN) following insemination or ICSI, compared across study groups. Additionally, the incidence of abnormal fertilisation (e.g., 0PN, 1PN, ≥3PN) will be evaluated. Fertilisation assessment will be performed at the standard time point of 16-20 hours post-insemination/ICSI.
  • Oocyte Degeneration Rate [24 hours post-ICSI]: The proportion of metaphase II (MII) oocytes that undergo degeneration following ICSI across the study groups. Degeneration will be assessed at the standard post-ICSI evaluation time point, and expressed as the percentage of injected oocytes exhibiting morphological signs of degeneration.

Secondary outcomes

  • Usable Blastocyst Rate [7 days post fertilization]: The proportion of normally fertilised oocytes that develop into blastocysts deemed suitable for vitrification or transfer based on established morphological and developmental criteria. The rate will be calculated as the number of usable blastocysts divided by the total number of fertilised oocytes (2PN) within each study group.
  • Blastocyst Quality at Time of Biopsy [7 days post fertilization]: Blastocyst quality will be assessed using the modified Gardner blastocyst grading scale, which evaluates blastocyst expansion stage, inner cell mass quality, and trophectoderm quality at the time of biopsy. The blastocyst expansion stage is scored from 1 to 6, where higher scores indicate a more expanded or hatched blastocyst. The inner cell mass and trophectoderm are graded from A to C, where A indicates the best quality, B indicates intermediate quality, and C indicates the lowest quality. Blastocyst quality scores will be compared across study groups to determine the impact of Ca²⁺ ionophore treatment on blastocyst development.
  • Blastocyst Ploidy on Day 5, 6, or 7 [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 week]: Assessment of chromosomal status of biopsied blastocysts using preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Ploidy results (euploid, aneuploid, mosaic) will be evaluated and compared across study groups to determine the influence of Ca²⁺ ionophore treatment on chromosomal integrity and embryo competence.

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to 43 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology cycles when ICSI is indicated.
2. Patients with a minimum of 3 MII oocytes after denudation.
3. Maternal age 18-43 years old.
4. PGT-A cycles with only trophectoderm biopsies on day 5/6/7.
5. BMI<35.
6. Fresh and frozen immotile ejaculated sperm.
7. Fresh and frozen TESE sperm (motile and immotile).
8. Globozoospermia.

10\. Couples undergoing ICSI due to poor fertilization history (≤30%), or previous fertilization failure.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. PGT-M/SR cycles.
2. Fresh and frozen motile ejaculated / FNA sperm.
3. IVF inseminated oocytes.

+Publications

  • Results publication: Yeste M, Jones C, Amdani SN, Patel S, Coward K. Oocyte activation deficiency: a role for an oocyte contribution? Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):23-47. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv040. Epub 2015 Sep 7. PMID 26346057
  • Results publication: Ye Y, Li N, Yan X, Wu R, Zhou W, Cheng L, Li Y. Genetic analysis of embryo in a human case of spontaneous oocyte activation: a case report. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020 Apr;36(4):294-296. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1687671. Epub 2019 Nov 10. PMID 31709844
  • Results publication: Yang X, Shu L, Cai L, Sun X, Cui Y, Liu J. Homozygous missense mutation Arg207Cys in the WEE2 gene causes female infertility and fertilization failure. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 May;36(5):965-971. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01418-9. Epub 2019 Mar 2. PMID 30826994
  • Results publication: Tosti E, Menezo Y. Gamete activation: basic knowledge and clinical applications. Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):420-39. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw014. Epub 2016 Jun 8. PMID 27278231
  • Results publication: Tiegs AW, Tao X, Landis J, Zhan Y, Franasiak JM, Seli E, Wells D, Fragouli E, Scott RT Jr. Sperm Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number Is Not a Predictor of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Cycle Outcomes. Reprod Sci. 2020 Jun;27(6):1350-1356. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00163-0. Epub 2020 Jan 28. PMID 31994001
  • Results publication: Tesarik J, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Mendoza C, Greco E. Use of a modified intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique to overcome sperm-borne and oocyte-borne oocyte activation failures. Fertil Steril. 2002 Sep;78(3):619-24. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03291-0. PMID 12215343
  • Results publication: Santella L, Dale B. Assisted yes, but where do we draw the line? Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Oct;31(4):476-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jul 3. PMID 26277587
  • Results publication: Sang Q, Li B, Kuang Y, Wang X, Zhang Z, Chen B, Wu L, Lyu Q, Fu Y, Yan Z, Mao X, Xu Y, Mu J, Li Q, Jin L, He L, Wang L. Homozygous Mutations in WEE2 Cause Fertilization Failure and Female Infertility. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Apr 5;102(4):649-657. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Mar 29. PMID 29606300
  • Results publication: Montag M, Koster M, van der Ven K, Bohlen U, van der Ven H. The benefit of artificial oocyte activation is dependent on the fertilization rate in a previous treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 May;24(5):521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 10. PMID 22417664
  • Results publication: Mateizel I, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, Belva F. Obstetric and neonatal outcome following ICSI with assisted oocyte activation by calcium ionophore treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jun;35(6):1005-1010. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1124-6. Epub 2018 Feb 1. PMID 29392515
  • Results publication: Karabulut S, Aksunger O, Ata C, Sagiroglu Y, Keskin I. Artificial oocyte activation with calcium ionophore for frozen sperm cycles. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018 Oct;64(5):381-388. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1452311. Epub 2018 Apr 5. PMID 29620419
  • Results publication: Kashir J, Nomikos M, Lai FA. Phospholipase C zeta and calcium oscillations at fertilisation: The evidence, applications, and further questions. Adv Biol Regul. 2018 Jan;67:148-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jbior.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 27. PMID 29108881
  • Results publication: Kashir J, Mistry BV, BuSaleh L, Abu-Dawas R, Nomikos M, Ajlan A, Abu-Dawud R, AlYacoub N, AlHassan S, Lai FA, Assiri AM, Coskun S. Phospholipase C zeta profiles are indicative of optimal sperm parameters and fertilisation success in patients undergoing fertility treatment. Andrology. 2020 Sep;8(5):1143-1159. doi: 10.1111/andr.12796. Epub 2020 May 20. PMID 32298520
  • Results publication: Kashir J. Increasing associations between defects in phospholipase C zeta and conditions of male infertility: not just ICSI failure? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jun;37(6):1273-1293. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01748-z. Epub 2020 Apr 14. PMID 32285298
  • Results publication: Kamath MS, Vogiatzi P, Sunkara SK, Woodward B. Oocyte activation for women following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD014040. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014040.pub2. PMID 39704318
  • Results publication: ESHRE Add-ons working group; Lundin K, Bentzen JG, Bozdag G, Ebner T, Harper J, Le Clef N, Moffett A, Norcross S, Polyzos NP, Rautakallio-Hokkanen S, Sfontouris I, Sermon K, Vermeulen N, Pinborg A. Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicinedagger. Hum Reprod. 2023 Nov 2;38(11):2062-2104. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead184. PMID 37747409
  • Results publication: Kashir J, Ganesh D, Jones C, Coward K. Oocyte activation deficiency and assisted oocyte activation: mechanisms, obstacles and prospects for clinical application. Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Feb 7;2022(2):hoac003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoac003. eCollection 2022. PMID 35261925
  • Results publication: Heindryckx B, De Gheselle S, Gerris J, Dhont M, De Sutter P. Efficiency of assisted oocyte activation as a solution for failed intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Nov;17(5):662-8. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60313-6. PMID 18983750
  • Results publication: Ebner T, Montag M; Oocyte Activation Study Group; Montag M, Van der Ven K, Van der Ven H, Ebner T, Shebl O, Oppelt P, Hirchenhain J, Krussel J, Maxrath B, Gnoth C, Friol K, Tigges J, Wunsch E, Luckhaus J, Beerkotte A, Weiss D, Grunwald K, Struller D, Etien C. Live birth after artificial oocyte activation using a ready-to-use ionophore: a prospective multicentre study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Apr;30(4):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Dec 9. PMID 25596904
  • Results publication: Capalbo A, Ottolini CS, Griffin DK, Ubaldi FM, Handyside AH, Rienzi L. Artificial oocyte activation with calcium ionophore does not cause a widespread increase in chromosome segregation errors in the second meiotic division of the oocyte. Fertil Steril. 2016 Mar;105(3):807-814.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 1. PMID 26658129
  • Results publication: Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015 Jan 20;313(3):255-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17985. PMID 25602996
  • Results publication: Bonte D, Ferrer-Buitrago M, Dhaenens L, Popovic M, Thys V, De Croo I, De Gheselle S, Steyaert N, Boel A, Vanden Meerschaut F, De Sutter P, Heindryckx B. Assisted oocyte activation significantly increases fertilization and pregnancy outcome in patients with low and total failed fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a 17-year retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2019 Aug;112(2):266-274. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 May 24. PMID 31133387
  • Results publication: Bassiri F, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Forozanfar M, Tavalaee M. Relationship between Sperm Parameters with Sperm Function Tests in Infertile Men with at Least One Failed Cycle after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycle. Int J Fertil Steril. 2020 Jan;13(4):324-329. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2020.5750. Epub 2019 Nov 11. PMID 31710194
  • Results publication: Aydinuraz B, Dirican EK, Olgan S, Aksunger O, Erturk OK. Artificial oocyte activation after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: A prospective randomized sibling oocyte study. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016 Dec;19(4):282-288. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2016.1240374. Epub 2016 Oct 13. PMID 27734719

+Investigators

  • BARBARA LAWRENZ, Study director, ART Fertility Clinics LLC