Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke

NCT07491952 — Recruiting, 750 participants, Imperative Care, Inc.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Clinical Evaluation of Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke (ADAPT 2.0)

RegistryNCT07491952, acronym ADAPT 2 0
StatusRecruiting
Study typeObservational
Enrollment750 (Estimated)
SponsorImperative Care, Inc. (Industry)
ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
InterventionsZoom System (Device)
Datesstart 2026-03-24, primary completion 2030-03-31 (estimated), completion 2030-06-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-03-25, last updated 2026-10-20
Locations25 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Ischemic Stroke All trials for Acute Stroke All trials of Zoom System

-Summary

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and clinical performance of ADAPT 2.0, first-line aspiration neurothrombectomy with Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
ADAPT 2.0: Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT)Device: Zoom SystemThe Zoom System is intended to be used as the first-line device and utilized within the FDA-cleared indications for use, consistent with the approved labeling and intended anatomical targets.
  • Zoom System (Device), also known as ADAPT 2.0, Aspiration thrombectomy for stroke, Continuous dual aspiration, Neurovascular aspiration thrombectomy: Aspiration neurothrombectomy using Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT)

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Proportion of patients achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of ≥2c at the end of procedure, as adjudicated by independent core-lab [End of procedure]: mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion. mTICI 0: No antegrade reperfusion; mTICI 1: Antegrade reperfusion past initial occlusion, limited distal filling; mTICI 2a: Antegrade reperfusion of less than half (<50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2b: Antegrade reperfusion of more than half (≥50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2c: Near-complete (90-99%) reperfusion, or filling of all distal branches with slower flow; mTICI 3: Complete antegrade reperfusion of all branches
  • Rate of Embolization to New Territory (ENT) on final angiography at the end of the procedure by investigator assessment [End of procedure]: Embolization to New Territory (ENT), defined as the presence of new occlusions on final angiography that occur in vascular territories remote from those effected by index stroke, as assessed by the investigator

Secondary outcomes

  • Time to achieve mTICI≥2c, defined as groin puncture to investigator assessment for mTICI≥2c [Intraprocedural]: The time from groin puncture to mTICI (modified treatment in cerebral infarction) score ≥ 2c using study device and technique. mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion. mTICI 0: No antegrade reperfusion; mTICI 1: Antegrade reperfusion past initial occlusion, limited distal filling; mTICI 2a: Antegrade reperfusion of less than half (<50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2b: Antegrade reperfusion of more than half (≥50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2c: Near-complete (90-99%) reperfusion, or filling of all distal branches with slower flow; mTICI 3: Complete antegrade reperfusion of all branches
  • Proportion of cases with clot ingestion, as evidenced by clot captured within the Zoom POD [Intraprocedural]: Proportion of cases with clot ingestion, as evidenced by clot captured within at least one of the Zoom PODs
  • Proportion of cases with clot captured within the Zoom POD connected to the outer aspiration catheter [Intraprocedural]: Proportion of cases with clot ingestion, as evidenced by clot captured within the outer Zoom PODs
  • Rate of rescue therapy [Intraprocedural]: Proportion of cases with rescue therapy, defined as unplanned use of another manufacturer's thrombectomy device, angioplasty, or stenting within the target vessel territory to achieve mTICI≥2c.
  • Rate of functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days [90 days post-procedure]: Proportion of patients achieving mRS (modified Rankin Scale) ≤2 at 90 days mRS range: 0 to 6; The mRS scale ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 5 (severe disability), with an additional category of 6 for death; higher score means worse outcome
  • Proportion of patients achieving First Pass Effect (FPE) mTICI ≥2c as adjudicated by independent core-lab [Intraprocedural]: Proportion of cases achieving First Pass Effect (FPE), defined as mTICI ≥2c after the first pass with the study device and technique as adjudicated by independent core-lab mTICI scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating better reperfusion. mTICI 0: No antegrade reperfusion; mTICI 1: Antegrade reperfusion past initial occlusion, limited distal filling; mTICI 2a: Antegrade reperfusion of less than half (<50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2b: Antegrade reperfusion of more than half (≥50%) of the previously occluded target artery's ischemic territory; mTICI 2c: Near-complete (90-99%) reperfusion, or filling of all distal branches with slower flow; mTICI 3: Complete antegrade reperfusion of all branches
  • Rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), as confirmed by imaging and independently adjudicated by medical monitor, at the 24-hour post-procedure [24-hour post-procedure]: Independently adjudicated rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) defined as any apparently extravascular blood in the brain or within the cranium confirmed by imaging that is associated with clinical deterioration as defined by an increase of four or more points in the NIHSS at 24 hours compared to the baseline assessment, or that led to death, and was judged to be the predominant cause of a neurologic deterioration or death, per ECASS III criteria
  • 90-day all-cause mortality [90 days post-procedure]: Rate of all-cause mortality through 90 days post-procedure
  • Rate of device-related Serious Adverse Events, independently adjudicated medical monitor [Intraprocedural]: Independently adjudicated rate of Serious Adverse Events related to study device

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
2. Subject or legally authorized representative has provided written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures and no later than 72 hours after the index procedure
3. Pre-stroke mRS 0-2
4. Subject is undergoing or has undergone an aspiration thrombectomy using the Zoom System with Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique (CDAT) as the first line device within its intended use

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 6 months
2. Female subject who is known to be pregnant at time of admission
3. Any intracranial hemorrhage in the qualifying head CT or MRI
4. Presence of tandem internal carotid artery occlusion, multiple occlusion locations (e.g., cavernous ICA and M1, separate M2 occlusions, etc.), or occlusions in multiple territories (e.g., MCA and ACA, bilateral, etc.).
5. In the opinion of the Investigator, the patient is not a suitable candidate for intervention with the Zoom System
6. Subject is currently enrolled in or planned to be enrolled in any concurrent interventional study that may impact the safety or performance data collected in this study

+Locations (25)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Huntsville HospitalHuntsville, AlabamaUnited StatesRecruiting
John Muir HealthWalnut Creek, CaliforniaUnited StatesRecruiting
University of South FloridaTampa, FloridaUnited StatesRecruiting
Wellstar Kennestone HospitalMarietta, GeorgiaUnited StatesRecruiting
Ochsner Clinic Foundation (Lafayette)Lafayette, LouisianaUnited StatesRecruiting
Ochsner Clinic FoundationNew Orleans, LouisianaUnited StatesRecruiting
University of MarylandBaltimore, MarylandUnited StatesRecruiting
Allina HealthMinneapolis, MinnesotaUnited StatesRecruiting
Albany Medical CollegeAlbany, New YorkUnited StatesRecruiting
University at Buffalo NeurosurgeryBuffalo, New YorkUnited StatesRecruiting
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew York, New YorkUnited StatesRecruiting
Weill Cornell MedicineNew York, New YorkUnited StatesRecruiting
SUNY Upstate Medical CenterSyracuse, New YorkUnited StatesRecruiting
Montefiore Medical CenterThe Bronx, New YorkUnited StatesRecruiting
TriHealth Good Samaritan HospitalCincinnati, OhioUnited StatesRecruiting
University of Oklahoma, Health Science CenterOklahoma City, OklahomaUnited StatesRecruiting
Prisma Health - UpstateGreenville, South CarolinaUnited StatesRecruiting
Fort Sanders Regional Medical CenterKnoxville, TennesseeUnited StatesRecruiting
Semmes Murphey FoundationMemphis, TennesseeUnited StatesRecruiting
HCA Houston Healthcare KingwoodKingwood, TexasUnited StatesRecruiting
Methodist Healthcare System of San AntonioSan Antonio, TexasUnited StatesRecruiting
University of Texas Science Health Center at San AntonioSan Antonio, TexasUnited StatesRecruiting
University of UtahSalt Lake City, UtahUnited StatesRecruiting
Inova Fairfax Medical CampusFalls Church, VirginiaUnited StatesRecruiting
Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's HospitalSpokane, WashingtonUnited StatesRecruiting

+Investigators