TrialReader


Intraoral Appliance (IOA) Model Evaluating the Efficacy of a Whitening Toothpaste

NCT07419685 — Not applicable, Completed, 31 participants, Church & Dwight Company, Inc.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Intraoral Appliance (IOA) Model Evaluating the Efficacy of Three Dentifrices on Enamel Lesion Remineralization

RegistryNCT07419685
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, crossover, masking: triple, prevention
Enrollment31 (Actual)
SponsorChurch & Dwight Company, Inc. (Industry)
ConditionsDental Caries
InterventionsNegative Control Toothpaste, Active Comparator, Test Toothpaste (Drug)
Datesstart 2024-10-08, primary completion 2025-01-17, completion 2025-01-17, first posted 2026-02-19, last updated 2026-02-19
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Dental Caries All trials of Negative Control Toothpaste All trials of Active Comparator

-Summary

This single-center, randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover in situ study evaluated the enamel remineralization potential and fluoride bioavailability of three dentifrices-one fluoride-free negative control, one positive control with 0.243% sodium fluoride, and one investigational dentifrice containing 0.243% sodium fluoride and 20% sodium bicarbonate. Healthy adult subjects wore a palatal acrylic appliance containing demineralized enamel specimens for three 9-day treatment periods, during which in vivo brushing/slurry exposure and ex vivo sucrose challenges were performed. Outcomes included percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and post-treatment enamel fluoride concentration.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This in situ intraoral appliance (IOA) model evaluates anticaries potential by exposing demineralized enamel specimens to oral conditions while allowing for ex vivo treatment assessments. Subjects wore acrylic palatal appliances containing four enamel specimens covered with steel gauze to promote plaque formation. Each of the three treatment periods lasted nine days and included twice-daily toothbrushing and dentifrice slurry swishing, plus three daily sucrose challenges. A minimum 4-day fluoride-free washout preceded each period. Post-treatment specimens were analyzed for %SMHR and enamel fluoride concentration.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Negative Control ToothpastePlacebo comparatorDrug: Negative Control ToothpasteFluoride-free dentifrice (0 ppm fluoride). Used for twice-daily brushing and slurry swishing during each test day.
ComparatorActive comparatorDrug: Active Comparator
Test ToothpasteExperimentalDrug: Test Toothpaste
  • Negative Control Toothpaste (Drug): Fluoride-free toothpaste
  • Active Comparator (Drug): Commercially available fluoride toothpaste
  • Test Toothpaste (Drug): lnvestigational fluoride toothpaste

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Percent Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMHR) [Time Frame: End of each 9-day test period (three test periods in total)] [End of each 9#day test period (three test periods in total)]
  • Post-treatment fluoride concentration (µg F/g enamel) [End of each 9-day test period (three test periods in total]

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults ≥18 years
* Good general and oral health
* Normal unstimulated salivary flow (≥1.5 mL/5 min)
* Functional dentition
* Oral conditions adequate to support the palatal appliance
* Ability to comply with brushing, slurry, appliance wear, and sucrose challenge procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

* Inability to tolerate appliance
* Oral pathology that interferes with participation
* Antibiotic use that violates withdrawal criteria
* Use of fluoride toothpaste during washout
* Participation in another appliance study in the past 4 weeks

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Therametric Technologies, Inc.Noblesville, IndianaUnited States

+Investigators

My Notes