Multicenter Clinical Trial of Myocardial Revascularization Using I-conduit and No-touch Saphenous Vein Graft
| Registry | NCT05757947 |
|---|---|
| Status | Unknown |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment |
| Enrollment | 106 (Estimated) |
| Sponsor | Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation (Network) |
| Conditions | Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Graft Failure, Cardiac Ischemia, Surgery |
| Interventions | Сoronary bypass surgery according to the I-graft method, Сoronary bypass surgery by the method of free conduit (Procedure) |
| Dates | start 2022-12-22, primary completion 2025-04-01 (estimated), completion 2025-12-22 (estimated), first posted 2023-03-07, last updated 2024-02-08 |
| Locations | 1 site in Russia |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Coronary Artery Disease All trials for Coronary Artery Stenosis All trials of Сoronary bypass surgery according to the I-graft method All trials of Сoronary bypass surgery by the method of free conduit
Authors hypothesize that "no-touch" saphenous vein as I graft is superior over conventional "no-touch" saphenous vein as free graft in the incidence of graft patency.
A multicenter single blind prospective randomized superiority study is conducted. Our hypothesis is that there is difference in the incidence of "no-touch" saphenous vein graft patency using it as the conventional free graft (group C) and I graft (group I) for myocardial revascularization more than 28%. If there is truly difference between groups, then total 106 patients for both groups are required to be 90% sure that the upper limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval would reveal a difference in favour of the "no-touch" saphenous vein I graft of 28%. The blinding process is applied to a patient, who is informed about received harvesting method of saphenous vein, but don't know the type of the graft cofiguration. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board. Depending on a type of the procedure, the patients are divided into two groups: conventional free graft (group C) 53 patients and I graft (group I) 53 patients. Randomization is conducted befor operation by using accidental sampling.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| "no-touch" saphenous vein as I-graft | Active comparator | Procedure: Сoronary bypass surgery according to the I-graft method | Coronary bypass surgery according to the I-graft method. Proximal anastomosis to RIMA. |
| "no-touch" saphenous vein as conventional free graft | Active comparator | Procedure: Сoronary bypass surgery by the method of free conduit | Coronary artery bypass grafting using the free conduit technique. Proximal anastomosis to aorta. |
Sex: All, ages: 25 Years to 70 Years
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with coronary artery disease requiring three-vessel myocardial revascularization * Patient consent to the study Exclusion Criteria: * The diameter of the target arteries for conduits of the internal mammary arteries is less than 1 mm * Hemodynamically significant atherosclerosis of the subclavian arteries in the first segment * Stenosis of the right coronary artery less than 90% * Concomitant pathology requiring additional simultaneous surgical correction * Lack of IMA * COPD with FEV1 <60% * BMI >35 * Prior heart surgery * Oncological diseases with a life expectancy of less than 5 years * ACS * CKD stage 4 and higher * The diameter of the SVG is less than 2 mm or its varicose expansion is more than 6 mm * CLTI IIb and more * Atherosclerosis of the brachiocephalic artery more than 50%
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMCR named after academician E.N. Meshalkin of the Ministry of Health of rhe Russian | Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast | Russia | Recruiting |