TrialReader


Outcome of Pulpotomy Versus Root Canal Therapy

NCT05279781 — Not applicable, Unknown, 60 participants, Jordan University of Science and Technology

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Quality of Life, Satisfaction and Outcome After Full Pulpotomy Compared to Root Canal Therapy

RegistryNCT05279781
StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment60 (Estimated)
SponsorJordan University of Science and Technology (Other)
ConditionsCaries, Pulpitis - Irreversible
InterventionsNon surgical root canal treatment, Pulpotomy (Procedure)
Datesstart 2019-04-01, primary completion 2024-09-20 (estimated), completion 2025-01-01 (estimated), first posted 2022-03-15, last updated 2022-10-26
Locations1 site in Jordan

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Caries All trials for Pulpitis - Irreversible All trials of Non surgical root canal treatment All trials of Pulpotomy

-Summary

Root canal therapy (RCT) is indicated once the pulp is diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. Despite favorable success rate reported for RCT in vital cases, it is time consuming, and might increases fracture susceptibility of teeth. With the advancement of materials and better understanding of pulpal healing, vital pulp therapy is practiced as an alternative treatment with high success rate. The aim of this study is to explore the outcome, quality of life and patient satisfaction after full pulpotomy compared to RCT.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Permanent molar teeth with carious pulp exposure and mature roots as evident on the preoperative periapical radiograph will be included in the study. The teeth will be randomly divided into 2 groups (n=30). The first group will be treated with Biodentine full pulpotomy and the second group will be endodontically treated. Based on a previously validated questionnaire. The quality of life and satisfaction of patients after pulpotomy treatment will be evaluated compared to those after endodontic treatment. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the treated teeth will be done 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Pain level will be recorded preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days after treatment.

The questionnaire consists of five components:

1. Characteristics of the patient; including age, gender, socioeconomic status, smoking, oral hygiene practices, frequency of dental visits, and dental history.
2. Postoperative complications including postoperative pain, discomfort,or swelling.

These symptoms will be evaluated after 1, 2, 3,5 and 7 days by contacting the patient on the phone and at follow up visits at 3, 6, and 12 months.
3. Quality of life instruments designed
4. Semantic scales designed to evaluate patient satisfaction with the treatment received.

Clinical and radiographic assessment of the treated teeth will be recorded. Success will be defined as clinically asymptomatic tooth with no sinus tract or swelling or periapical lesion.

Data will be analysed statistically using appropriate tests based on the distribution of the results.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Root canal treatment groupActive comparatorProcedure: Non surgical root canal treatmentThis group will receive complete root canal therapy
Pulpotomy groupActive comparatorProcedure: PulpotomyThis group will receive full pulpotomy
  • Non surgical root canal treatment (Procedure): Complete root canal treatment will be performed followed by direct restoration
  • Pulpotomy (Procedure): Full pulpotomy followed by direct restoration

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Post operative pain level on numerical pain scale [7 days]: Pain level after treatment will be assessed on a numerical scale from 0-10 where is zero refer to no pain and 10 is the most sever pain.
  • Post operative pain level on visual analogue scale [7 days]: Pain level after treatment will be assessed on a visual analogy scale from 0-10, where is zero refer to no pain and 10 is the most sever pain.

Secondary outcomes

  • Clinical success [6, 12, 24, 48 months]: The tooth should be pain free, no sinus tract, no tenderness to palpation and no swelling. As measured by clinical examination
  • Radiographic success [6, 12, 24, 48 months]: Periapical x-ray will be taken it should show no bone lesions or root resorption

Other outcomes

  • The quality of life questionnaire [6,12, 24, 48 months]: A questionnaire validated previously by Dugas et al 2002 will be used to assess Quality of life

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 9 Years to 70 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Medically fit patient
* mature permanent tooth with deep caries
* diagnosis of irreversible pulpits.
* tooth is restored with a direct restoration

Exclusion Criteria:

* immature teeth
* teeth were hemostasis cannot be achieved after pulpotomy
* necrotic teeth
* lack of response to cold test

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Jordan University of science and technologyIrbidJordanRecruiting

+Publications

  • Results publication: Taha NA, About I, Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Conservative Management of Mature Permanent Teeth with Carious Pulp Exposure. J Endod. 2020 Sep;46(9S):S33-S41. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.025. PMID 32950193

+Investigators

  • Nessrin Taha, PhD, Principal investigator, Jordan University of Science and Technology

My Notes