| Registry | NCT05204329, acronym MSC Secretome |
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Early Phase 1 |
| Study type | Interventional; non randomized, sequential, masking: none, treatment |
| Enrollment | 9 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | University of Illinois at Chicago (Other); collaborators: National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institutes of Health (NIH) |
| Conditions | Mesenchymal Stromal Cells, Cornea, Corneal Defect, Corneal Epithelium Defect |
| Interventions | MSC Secretome Eye Drops (Biological) |
| Dates | start 2024-01-24, primary completion 2024-11-08, completion 2024-11-08, first posted 2022-01-24, last updated 2026-10-07 |
| Locations | 1 site in United States |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Mesenchymal Stromal Cells All trials for Cornea All trials of MSC Secretome Eye Drops
-Summary
This study is a longitudinal assessment using a classic dose-escalation study design to assess the safety and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topical MSC Secretome eye drops. The study will be conducted at Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary located at University of Illinois at Chicago. The study will use anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)/Scheimpflug Imaging, esthesiometry, and visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess treatment tolerability.
Expand all sections · Collapse all
+Detailed description
The "Safety of Topical Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome for Ocular Surface Disease" study is designed to evaluate the safety and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of topical MSC Secretome eye drops in patients with chronic ocular surface disease through a dose-escalation study under a 28-day topical application protocol, and also obtain a preliminary observation on the following:
1. Incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) assessed at 28 days following treatment initiation
2. Proportion of patients with improved corneal epithelial barrier at 28 days compared to baseline
3. Final visual acuity, corneal epithelial thickness, corneal stromal haze, corneal sensation, and treatment tolerability
The objective is to determine the dose of MSC Secretome through a first-in-human study through a dose-escalation strategy targeting a toxicity rate of 33% or less.
+Arms and interventions
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|
| Low dose of allogenic MSC drops | Active comparator | Biological: MSC Secretome Eye Drops | Escalating doses of allogenic MSC eye drops will be assigned at the lowest dose level. |
| Medium dose of allogenic MSC drops | Active comparator | Biological: MSC Secretome Eye Drops | Escalating doses of allogenic MSC eye drops will be assigned at the medium dose level. |
| High dose of allogenic MSC drops | Active comparator | Biological: MSC Secretome Eye Drops | Escalating doses of allogenic MSC eye drops will be assigned at the high dose level. |
- MSC Secretome Eye Drops (Biological): MSC Secretome eye drop will be dispensed.
+Outcome measures
Primary outcomes
- The Number of Participants In Each Dose Frequency Group With No Dose Limiting Toxicities Until Day 28 From The Start of Topical Allogeneic BM-MSC Secretome [Day 28]: Safety was defined with the absence of dose-limiting toxicity in the study eye until Day 28. Adverse events were defined using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5). Ocular adverse events included:
Grade 2: vision loss ≤ 3 lines
* increased corneal fluorescein staining by >50%
* new conjunctivitis, scleritis, or uveitis 1-2+ cells in AC
* increased corneal haze > 50%, stromal loss 10-30% Grade 3: loss of vision by > 3 lines up to 20/200
* new mild to moderate infectious/inflammatory keratitis with vision loss up to 20/200
* new corneal ulceration with > 30% stromal loss
* new uveitis with 3-4+ cells in AC Grade 4: loss of vision by > 3 lines worse than 20/200
* new severe infectious/inflammatory keratitis
* corneal perforation
* Anaphylactic reaction, New SJS Note: Any grade 2 adverse event that lasted longer than 2 weeks or any adverse event of grades 3 or 4 was considered DLT. We also recorded all adverse events at each visit.
- Corneal Epithelial Integrity [Day 28]: The primary efficacy outcome measure was improved corneal epithelial barrier at 28 days compared to baseline - defined as ≥ 50% reduction in corneal fluorescein staining score using National Eye Institute (NEI) grading scale as measured by the investigators via slit lamp examination and assessment of slit lamp images.
Secondary outcomes
- Visual Acuity [Day 28]: Mean Change in best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA) in ETDRS letters on day 28 relative to baseline for each dose frequency group. The ETDRS letter score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better visual acuity.
- Change in Corneal Scarring / Haze Compared to Baseline [Day 28]: Corneal scarring/haze was assessed as the size of the hyperreflective area on AS OCT imaging (Cirrus 6000; HD cornea, a-scans) to assess the treatment effect on DAY #28 relative to baseline.
- Time to Improvement of Corneal Epithelial Barrier [Baseline, Days 7, 14, 28, 56, 90]: The time required for an improved epithelial barrier function was assessed at each visit throughout the trial.
- Tolerability of MSC Secretome Drops (Change in VAS Score on Day 28 Compared to Baseline) [Day 28]: Mean change in the patients' self-reported severity of discomfort and pain with visual analog scale (VAS; range 0 -100) on Day 28 compared to baseline for each dose frequency group. The higher numbers indicate more severe discomfort and pain.
- Change in Central Corneal Epithelial Thickness [Day 28]: Mean change in Central Corneal Epithelial Thickness on Day 28 from baseline.
- Durability of Corneal Epithelial Status Improvement [Days 42, 56, 90]: In patients with an improvement in corneal epithelial integrity defined as ≥50% improvement in corneal fluorescein staining with NEI scale on Day 28 from baseline, was the improvement maintained on Days 42, 56 and 90.
+Eligibility
Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients 18 years of age or older
* Chronic corneal epithelial disease with fluorescein staining score ≥ 6 by NEI grading scale
* Reduced corneal sensation (≤ 4 cm measured by Cochet Bonnet esthesiometry) in at least one corneal quadrant
* A stable ocular surface with no objective clinical evidence of significant (> 50%) improvement/worsening of the epithelial disease in the last 30 days
* Epithelial disease refractory to conventional non-surgical treatments (e.g., preservative-free artificial tears, gels or ointments; discontinuation of preserved topical drops; anti-inflammatory therapy)
Exclusion Criteria:
* Any active or suspected ocular infection (bacterial, viral, fungal or protozoal).
* Evidence of corneal ulceration with stromal loss > 10%
* Presence of an epithelial defect ≥1.0 mm in the largest diameter in the affected eye
* Presence of any size epithelial defect that has been persistent for more than 30 days
* Patients unable to discontinue or intermittently remove therapeutic contact lens in the study eye (to apply drops) during the 4-week study period
* History of any ocular surgery (including laser or refractive surgical procedures) in the affected eye within the 3 months prior to study enrollment
* History of chemical injury within the last 6 months prior to study enrollment Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications (e.g.,fluorescein)
* History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction
* Use of any investigational agent within 4 weeks of screening visit
* History of previous enrollment in the MSC Secretome Study at a lower dose
* Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study
* Participants who are pregnant at the time of study enrollment
+Posted results
Participant flow
| Milestone | Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops |
|---|
| Started | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Completed | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Outcome results
- The Number of Participants In Each Dose Frequency Group With No Dose Limiting Toxicities Until Day 28 From The Start of Topical Allogeneic BM-MSC Secretome (Primary), Number, participants: Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 3; Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 3; High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 1
- Corneal Epithelial Integrity (Primary), Number, participants: Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 3; Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 3; High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 1
- Visual Acuity (Secondary), Mean, ETDRS Letter Scores: Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 15 +/- 5; Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 12.7 +/- 10.8; High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops -10.7 +/- 13
- Change in Corneal Scarring / Haze Compared to Baseline (Secondary), Mean, (µm)²: Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 0 +/- 0; Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 0 +/- 0; High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 0 +/- 0
- Time to Improvement of Corneal Epithelial Barrier (Secondary), Number, participants: Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 0; Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 0; High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 0
- Tolerability of MSC Secretome Drops (Change in VAS Score on Day 28 Compared to Baseline) (Secondary), Mean, VAS Score: Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops -7 +/- 11.3; Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 13.3 +/- 32; High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops 4.7 +/- 31
- Change in Central Corneal Epithelial Thickness (Secondary), Mean, micrometers: Low Dose of Allogenic MSC Drops 7 +/- 8; Medium Dose of Allogenic MSC Drops -1.6 +/- 2.9; High Dose of Allogenic MSC Drops 6 +/- 0
- Durability of Corneal Epithelial Status Improvement (Secondary), Number, participants: Low Dose of Allogenic MSC Drops 0; Medium Dose of Allogenic MSC Drops 0; High Dose of Allogenic MSC Drops 0
Adverse events
Time frame: From first dose (Day 0) through Day 90 follow-up (90 days after start of treatment).
| Arm | Deaths | Serious adverse events | Other adverse events |
|---|
| Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | 0/3 (0.0%) | 0/3 (0.0%) | 0/3 (0.0%) |
| Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | 0/3 (0.0%) | 0/3 (0.0%) | 0/3 (0.0%) |
| High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | 0/3 (0.0%) | 0/3 (0.0%) | 2/3 (66.7%) |
Other adverse events by term
| Term | Organ system | Low Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | Medium Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops | High Dose of Allogeneic MSC Drops |
|---|
| New corneal epithelial defect | Eye disorders | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1/3 |
| Decreased visual acuity (met DLT criteria) | Eye disorders | 0/3 | 0/3 | 1/3 |
+Locations (1)
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|
| University of Illinois at Chicago | Chicago, Illinois | United States | |
+Publications
- Prockop DJ, Oh JY. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs): role as guardians of inflammation. Mol Ther. 2012 Jan;20(1):14-20. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.211. Epub 2011 Oct 18. PMID 22008910
- Mittal SK, Omoto M, Amouzegar A, Sahu A, Rezazadeh A, Katikireddy KR, Shah DI, Sahu SK, Chauhan SK. Restoration of Corneal Transparency by Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2016 Oct 11;7(4):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 29. PMID 27693426
- Wang LT, Ting CH, Yen ML, Liu KJ, Sytwu HK, Wu KK, Yen BL. Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for treatment towards immune- and inflammation-mediated diseases: review of current clinical trials. J Biomed Sci. 2016 Nov 4;23(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12929-016-0289-5. PMID 27809910
- Yun YI, Park SY, Lee HJ, Ko JH, Kim MK, Wee WR, Reger RL, Gregory CA, Choi H, Fulcher SF, Prockop DJ, Oh JY. Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effects of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in a murine model of corneal injury. Cytotherapy. 2017 Jan;19(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Nov 10. PMID 27840134
- Yao L, Li ZR, Su WR, Li YP, Lin ML, Zhang WX, Liu Y, Wan Q, Liang D. Role of mesenchymal stem cells on cornea wound healing induced by acute alkali burn. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030842. Epub 2012 Feb 17. PMID 22363499
- Roddy GW, Oh JY, Lee RH, Bartosh TJ, Ylostalo J, Coble K, Rosa RH Jr, Prockop DJ. Action at a distance: systemically administered adult stem/progenitor cells (MSCs) reduce inflammatory damage to the cornea without engraftment and primarily by secretion of TNF-alpha stimulated gene/protein 6. Stem Cells. 2011 Oct;29(10):1572-9. doi: 10.1002/stem.708. PMID 21837654
- Oh JY, Kim MK, Shin MS, Lee HJ, Ko JH, Wee WR, Lee JH. The anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008 Apr;26(4):1047-55. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0737. Epub 2008 Jan 10. PMID 18192235
- Ma Y, Xu Y, Xiao Z, Yang W, Zhang C, Song E, Du Y, Li L. Reconstruction of chemically burned rat corneal surface by bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006 Feb;24(2):315-21. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0046. Epub 2005 Aug 18. PMID 16109757
- Li F, Zhao SZ. Control of Cross Talk between Angiogenesis and Inflammation by Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Ocular Surface Diseases. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:7961816. doi: 10.1155/2016/7961816. Epub 2016 Mar 24. PMID 27110252
- Cejkova J, Trosan P, Cejka C, Lencova A, Zajicova A, Javorkova E, Kubinova S, Sykova E, Holan V. Suppression of alkali-induced oxidative injury in the cornea by mesenchymal stem cells growing on nanofiber scaffolds and transferred onto the damaged corneal surface. Exp Eye Res. 2013 Nov;116:312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18. PMID 24145108
- Eslani M, Putra I, Shen X, Hamouie J, Afsharkhamseh N, Besharat S, Rosenblatt MI, Dana R, Hematti P, Djalilian AR. Corneal Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Are Directly Antiangiogenic via PEDF and sFLT-1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Oct 1;58(12):5507-5517. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22680. PMID 29075761
- Uccelli A, de Rosbo NK. The immunomodulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells: mode of action and pathways. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Sep;1351:114-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12815. Epub 2015 Jul 6. PMID 26152292
- Coulson-Thomas VJ, Coulson-Thomas YM, Gesteira TF, Kao WW. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Mechanisms by Which Mesenchymal Stem Cells Suppress the Immune System. Ocul Surf. 2016 Apr;14(2):121-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2015.11.004. Epub 2016 Jan 12. PMID 26804815
- Maguire G. Stem cell therapy without the cells. Commun Integr Biol. 2013 Nov 1;6(6):e26631. doi: 10.4161/cib.26631. Epub 2013 Sep 27. PMID 24567776
- Madrigal M, Rao KS, Riordan NH. A review of therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cell secretions and induction of secretory modification by different culture methods. J Transl Med. 2014 Oct 11;12:260. doi: 10.1186/s12967-014-0260-8. PMID 25304688
- Fernandes-Cunha GM, Na KS, Putra I, Lee HJ, Hull S, Cheng YC, Blanco IJ, Eslani M, Djalilian AR, Myung D. Corneal Wound Healing Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome Delivered Within a Viscoelastic Gel Carrier. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019 May;8(5):478-489. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0178. Epub 2019 Jan 15. PMID 30644653
- Eslani M, Putra I, Shen X, Hamouie J, Tadepalli A, Anwar KN, Kink JA, Ghassemi S, Agnihotri G, Reshetylo S, Mashaghi A, Dana R, Hematti P, Djalilian AR. Cornea-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Therapeutically Modulate Macrophage Immunophenotype and Angiogenic Function. Stem Cells. 2018 May;36(5):775-784. doi: 10.1002/stem.2781. Epub 2018 Jan 27. PMID 29341332
- Samaeekia R, Rabiee B, Putra I, Shen X, Park YJ, Hematti P, Eslani M, Djalilian AR. Effect of Human Corneal Mesenchymal Stromal Cell-derived Exosomes on Corneal Epithelial Wound Healing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):5194-5200. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24803. PMID 30372747
- Vizoso FJ, Eiro N, Cid S, Schneider J, Perez-Fernandez R. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome: Toward Cell-Free Therapeutic Strategies in Regenerative Medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 25;18(9):1852. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091852. PMID 28841158
- Bara JJ, Richards RG, Alini M, Stoddart MJ. Concise review: Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells change phenotype following in vitro culture: implications for basic research and the clinic. Stem Cells. 2014 Jul;32(7):1713-23. doi: 10.1002/stem.1649. PMID 24449458
- Ivy SP, Siu LL, Garrett-Mayer E, Rubinstein L. Approaches to phase 1 clinical trial design focused on safety, efficiency, and selected patient populations: a report from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Mar 15;16(6):1726-36. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1961. Epub 2010 Mar 9. PMID 20215542
- Cook N, Hansen AR, Siu LL, Abdul Razak AR. Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety. Mol Oncol. 2015 May;9(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.025. Epub 2014 Aug 14. PMID 25160636
+Study documents
+Investigators
- Ali R Djalilian, MD, Principal investigator, University of Illinois at Chicago
- Charlotte E Joslin, OD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Illinois at Chicago
- Elmer Y Tu, MD, Principal investigator, University of Illinois at Chicago
+Funding
NIH grants: 1UG3EY031809-01