Assessment of Medication Optimization in Rural Kentucky Appalachian Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: The AMOR Kentucky Study
| Registry | NCT05078437, acronym AMOR-KY |
| Status | Terminated - Funding ended |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; na, single group, masking: none, supportive care |
| Enrollment | 16 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Daniela Moga (Other); collaborators: National Institute on Aging (NIA), Northern California Institute of Research and Education |
| Conditions | Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment |
| Interventions | Medication therapy management (Behavioral) |
| Dates | start 2021-10-14, primary completion 2023-05-14, completion 2023-05-14, first posted 2021-10-14, last updated 2024-08-23 |
| Locations | 1 site in United States |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Dementia All trials for Mild Cognitive Impairment All trials of Medication therapy management
-Summary
The AMOR-Kentucky study will examine the impact of a pharmacist-physician patient-centered medication therapy management deprescribing intervention to address inappropriate medication use in patients with cognitive impairment in underserved, lower socioeconomic populations in rural Appalachian Kentucky. The results of this study will provide valuable insights on how to expand and implement deprescribing interventions using telemedicine to reduce the prevalence and the associated healthcare costs of medication-related problems in patients with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in rural areas throughout the US. The investigators will assess the potential use of telemedicine in this population by performing an initial single arm, unblinded study of the medication therapy management (MTM) describing intervention in rural/underserved Kentucky Appalachian populations with cognitive impairment and/or dementia using potentially inappropriate medications (n=50). Following initial recruitment and clinical evaluation, engaged participants will have their medication list reviewed by a pharmacist-clinician team to identify targets for deprescribing intervention. The intervention will be engaged remotely with the participant and their caregiver, and the MTM team at 4 weeks post initial evaluation, and then reinforced at a 3-month timepoint. This approach will be carried forward through a telemedicine practice at University of Kentucky that is comprised of approximately 500 patient-caregiver dyads throughout rural areas of Appalachian Kentucky.
Expand all sections · Collapse all
+Arms and interventions
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|
| Treatment optimization | Experimental | Behavioral: Medication therapy management | Participants will undergo an evaluation of all the medications taken and changes will be proposed for treatment optimization. |
- Medication therapy management (Behavioral): The proposed deprescribing intervention is using a patient-centered framework by: (1) balancing the risks and benefits, and addressing the specific needs of each individual patient, (2) considering the individual patient and the caregiver's preferences and values, and (3) empowering the patient and the caregiver to take responsibility and fully participate in the decision-making process as equal team players.
+Outcome measures
Primary outcomes
- Mean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness Index [Baseline and 3 months]: The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) is a score based on 10 criteria used to assess the appropriateness of each medication taken by a study participant. Medications are rated as "appropriate", "marginally appropriate", or "inappropriate" based on these ten criteria. Each medication was scored between 0 (appropriate) and the maximum of 18 (inappropriate for all criteria), then the total MAI was obtained by adding the medication specific MAIs for all medications reported by the participant. For each participant, the total MAI is calculated as the sum of the score for all the medications taken by that participant. The minimum is 0 (all medications are appropriate), but there is no maximum because that depends on the number of medications. A decrease in MAI indicates improvement in medication appropriateness.
- Participant Satisfaction [6 months]: Patients will be asked to provide feedback on participation in the deprescribing process.
- Connectivity Issues [3 months and 6 months]: Participants will be asked to report on any connectivity issues that would impact the appropriate delivery of the intervention using the telemedicine approach. Number of participants that experienced any connectivity issues.
Secondary outcomes
- Deprescribing Assessments [6 months]: The revised Patients Attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) will assess attitudes towards deprescribing
- Caregiver Assessment- Zarit [6 months]: The appraisal of self-care will be used to asses additional outcomes in caregiver. Zarit Burden Interview includes 22 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) with the sum of scores ranging between 0-88. Higher scores indicate greater burden. A score of 17 or more was considered high burden.
- Cognitive Function- CDR Global Score [6 months]: The investigators will use the cognitive battery that is incorporated in the telemedicine assessments to explore the impact of the intervention on cognitive function. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score 0: Normal (unimpaired) cognition; 0.5: MCI due to AD; 1: Mild AD dementia; 2: Moderate AD dementia; 3: Severe AD dementia
+Eligibility
Sex: All, ages: 60 Years to any
1. 60 years or older,
2. diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia,
3. using at least one potentially inappropriate medications,
4. living in the community,
5. willing to participate in the study (both the patient and the caregiver)
+Posted results
Participant flow
| Milestone | Treatment Optimization |
|---|
| Started | 16 |
| Completed | 15 |
| Not completed | 1 |
Outcome results
- Mean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness Index (Primary), Least squares mean, units on a scale: Intervention -5.8 +/- 6.3
- Participant Satisfaction (Primary), Count of participants, Participants: Intervention 10
- Connectivity Issues (Primary), Count of participants, Participants: Treatment Optimization 6
- Deprescribing Assessments (Secondary), Count of participants, Participants: Treatment Optimization 11
- Caregiver Assessment- Zarit (Secondary), Mean, units on a scale: Treatment Optimization 1.3 +/- 6.6
- Cognitive Function- CDR Global Score (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Treatment Optimization 0.2 +/- 0.4
Adverse events
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Deaths | Serious adverse events | Other adverse events |
|---|
| Treatment Optimization | 1/16 (6.3%) | 1/16 (6.3%) | 12/16 (75.0%) |
Serious adverse events by term
| Term | Organ system | Treatment Optimization |
|---|
| Infection or febrile neutropenia | Infections and infestations | 1/16 |
Other adverse events by term
| Term | Organ system | Treatment Optimization |
|---|
| allergy/immunology | General disorders | 2/16 |
| gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | 2/16 |
| infection or febrile neutropenia | Infections and infestations | 1/16 |
| metabolic/laboratory | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 2/16 |
| musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 3/16 |
| neurology | Nervous system disorders | 5/16 |
| pain | General disorders | 1/16 |
| renal/genitourinary | Renal and urinary disorders | 1/16 |
+Locations (1)
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|
| University of Kentucky | Lexington, Kentucky | United States | |
+Study documents
+Funding