TrialReader


Assessment of Medication Optimization in Rural Kentucky Appalachian Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia

NCT05078437 — Not applicable, Terminated, 16 participants, Daniela Moga

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Assessment of Medication Optimization in Rural Kentucky Appalachian Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: The AMOR Kentucky Study

RegistryNCT05078437, acronym AMOR-KY
StatusTerminated - Funding ended
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, supportive care
Enrollment16 (Actual)
SponsorDaniela Moga (Other); collaborators: National Institute on Aging (NIA), Northern California Institute of Research and Education
ConditionsDementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment
InterventionsMedication therapy management (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2021-10-14, primary completion 2023-05-14, completion 2023-05-14, first posted 2021-10-14, last updated 2024-08-23
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Dementia All trials for Mild Cognitive Impairment All trials of Medication therapy management

-Summary

The AMOR-Kentucky study will examine the impact of a pharmacist-physician patient-centered medication therapy management deprescribing intervention to address inappropriate medication use in patients with cognitive impairment in underserved, lower socioeconomic populations in rural Appalachian Kentucky. The results of this study will provide valuable insights on how to expand and implement deprescribing interventions using telemedicine to reduce the prevalence and the associated healthcare costs of medication-related problems in patients with mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in rural areas throughout the US. The investigators will assess the potential use of telemedicine in this population by performing an initial single arm, unblinded study of the medication therapy management (MTM) describing intervention in rural/underserved Kentucky Appalachian populations with cognitive impairment and/or dementia using potentially inappropriate medications (n=50). Following initial recruitment and clinical evaluation, engaged participants will have their medication list reviewed by a pharmacist-clinician team to identify targets for deprescribing intervention. The intervention will be engaged remotely with the participant and their caregiver, and the MTM team at 4 weeks post initial evaluation, and then reinforced at a 3-month timepoint. This approach will be carried forward through a telemedicine practice at University of Kentucky that is comprised of approximately 500 patient-caregiver dyads throughout rural areas of Appalachian Kentucky.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Treatment optimizationExperimentalBehavioral: Medication therapy managementParticipants will undergo an evaluation of all the medications taken and changes will be proposed for treatment optimization.
  • Medication therapy management (Behavioral): The proposed deprescribing intervention is using a patient-centered framework by: (1) balancing the risks and benefits, and addressing the specific needs of each individual patient, (2) considering the individual patient and the caregiver's preferences and values, and (3) empowering the patient and the caregiver to take responsibility and fully participate in the decision-making process as equal team players.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Mean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness Index [Baseline and 3 months]: The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) is a score based on 10 criteria used to assess the appropriateness of each medication taken by a study participant. Medications are rated as "appropriate", "marginally appropriate", or "inappropriate" based on these ten criteria. Each medication was scored between 0 (appropriate) and the maximum of 18 (inappropriate for all criteria), then the total MAI was obtained by adding the medication specific MAIs for all medications reported by the participant. For each participant, the total MAI is calculated as the sum of the score for all the medications taken by that participant. The minimum is 0 (all medications are appropriate), but there is no maximum because that depends on the number of medications. A decrease in MAI indicates improvement in medication appropriateness.
  • Participant Satisfaction [6 months]: Patients will be asked to provide feedback on participation in the deprescribing process.
  • Connectivity Issues [3 months and 6 months]: Participants will be asked to report on any connectivity issues that would impact the appropriate delivery of the intervention using the telemedicine approach. Number of participants that experienced any connectivity issues.

Secondary outcomes

  • Deprescribing Assessments [6 months]: The revised Patients Attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) will assess attitudes towards deprescribing
  • Caregiver Assessment- Zarit [6 months]: The appraisal of self-care will be used to asses additional outcomes in caregiver. Zarit Burden Interview includes 22 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always) with the sum of scores ranging between 0-88. Higher scores indicate greater burden. A score of 17 or more was considered high burden.
  • Cognitive Function- CDR Global Score [6 months]: The investigators will use the cognitive battery that is incorporated in the telemedicine assessments to explore the impact of the intervention on cognitive function. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score 0: Normal (unimpaired) cognition; 0.5: MCI due to AD; 1: Mild AD dementia; 2: Moderate AD dementia; 3: Severe AD dementia

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 60 Years to any

1. 60 years or older,
2. diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia,
3. using at least one potentially inappropriate medications,
4. living in the community,
5. willing to participate in the study (both the patient and the caregiver)

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneTreatment Optimization
Started16
Completed15
Not completed1

Outcome results

  • Mean Change From Baseline in the Medication Appropriateness Index (Primary), Least squares mean, units on a scale: Intervention -5.8 +/- 6.3
  • Participant Satisfaction (Primary), Count of participants, Participants: Intervention 10
  • Connectivity Issues (Primary), Count of participants, Participants: Treatment Optimization 6
  • Deprescribing Assessments (Secondary), Count of participants, Participants: Treatment Optimization 11
  • Caregiver Assessment- Zarit (Secondary), Mean, units on a scale: Treatment Optimization 1.3 +/- 6.6
  • Cognitive Function- CDR Global Score (Secondary), Mean, score on a scale: Treatment Optimization 0.2 +/- 0.4

Adverse events

Time frame: 6 months

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Treatment Optimization1/16 (6.3%)1/16 (6.3%)12/16 (75.0%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemTreatment Optimization
Infection or febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations1/16

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemTreatment Optimization
allergy/immunologyGeneral disorders2/16
gastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders2/16
infection or febrile neutropeniaInfections and infestations1/16
metabolic/laboratoryMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/16
musculoskeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/16
neurologyNervous system disorders5/16
painGeneral disorders1/16
renal/genitourinaryRenal and urinary disorders1/16

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of KentuckyLexington, KentuckyUnited States

+Study documents

+Funding

NIH grants: R24AG064025

My Notes