Video Images About Decisions for Ethical Outcomes in the Emergency Department (VIDEO-ED)

NCT04931797 — Not applicable, Completed, 598 participants, Massachusetts General Hospital

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Using the Emergency Department Visit to Promote Advance Care Planning

RegistryNCT04931797, acronym VIDEO-ED
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, supportive care
Enrollment598 (Actual)
SponsorMassachusetts General Hospital (Other); collaborators: University of California, Davis, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
ConditionsEmergencies
Interventionsvideo decision aid, control arm ACP information sheet (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2022-04-25, primary completion 2025-06-10, completion 2026-05-30, first posted 2021-06-18, last updated 2026-10-21
Locations4 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Emergencies All trials of video decision aid All trials of control arm ACP information sheet

-Summary

A randomized controlled trial of a video decision aid in the Emergency Department Setting to improve advance care planning documentation.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

A randomized controlled trial of a video decision aid in the Emergency Department setting shown to patients followed by a brief advance care planning discussion and then relay that discussion to the patient's primary care provider and/or admitting clinical team and look at rates of advance care planning documentation in the electronic health record over time. Primary outcome is advance care planning documentation in the EHR at 3 months.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
VideoExperimentalBehavioral: video decision aidVideo decision aid and advance care planning discussion
Control armActive comparatorBehavioral: control arm ACP information sheetUsual advance care planning services provided at the study site.
  • video decision aid (Behavioral): advance care planning video decision aid
  • control arm ACP information sheet (Behavioral): control arm ACP information sheet

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Number of Participants With EHR Documentation of Advance Care Planning at 3 Months [3 months]: EHR documentation of advance care planning at three months assessed by Natural Language Processing.

Secondary outcomes

  • Patient Preferences for Goals of Care [Baseline (Day 1) for Control arm, and immediately after the video decision aid at Day 1 for the Video Arm]: Patient preference for life prolonging care, limited care or comfort care.
  • Concordance Between Stated and Documented Preferences [6 months]: Concordance between stated and documented preferences among participants who died during follow-up
  • ACP Documentation in the EHR [at 6 months]: Advance care planning documentation in the EHR at six months by Natural Language Processing
  • Patient Knowledge of ACP [Baseline (Day 1) for Control arm, and immediately after the video decision aid at Day 1 for the Video Arm]: Knowledge score of advance care planning, range 0-5, higher value is better.
  • Patient ACP Engagement With ACP Topics [Baseline (Day 1) for Control arm, and immediately after the video decision aid at Day 1 for the Video Arm]: Advance care planning engagement (ACPE) score, range 1-5, higher value is better.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 50 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* anyone aged 65 and over or anyone aged over 50-64 with an indicator of serious illness

Exclusion Criteria:

* non english or spanish speakers those with a POLST legally blind medically non stable requiring ICU level care

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneVideoControl Arm
Started298300
Completed298300
Not completed00

Outcome results

  • Number of Participants With EHR Documentation of Advance Care Planning at 3 Months (Primary), Count of participants, Participants: Video 136; Control Arm 94 (p <0.001)
  • Patient Preferences for Goals of Care (Secondary), Count of participants, Participants: Video 175; Control Arm 168 (p 0.67)
  • Concordance Between Stated and Documented Preferences (Secondary), Count of participants, Participants: Video 39; Control Arm 15 (p < 0.001)
  • ACP Documentation in the EHR (Secondary), Count of participants, Participants: Video 156; Control Arm 118 (p 0.002)
  • Patient Knowledge of ACP (Secondary), Mean, Score on a scale: Video 4.1 +/- 1.0; Control Arm 3.1 +/- 1.1 (p <0.001)
  • Patient ACP Engagement With ACP Topics (Secondary), Mean, Scores on a scale: Video 4.1 +/- 0.7; Control Arm 3.9 +/- 0.9 (p 0.004)

Adverse events

Time frame: From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to six months

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Video58/298 (19.5%)0/298 (0.0%)0/298 (0.0%)
Control Arm45/300 (15.0%)0/300 (0.0%)0/300 (0.0%)

+Locations (4)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
UC DavisDavis, CaliforniaUnited States
Massachusetts General HospitalBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
Brigham and Women's HospitalBoston, MassachusettsUnited States
Newton Wellesley HospitalNewton, MassachusettsUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Volandes AE, Bohossian H, Chang Y, Lindvall C, Paasche-Orlow MK, Randa S, Samarakoon U, Hashimoto T, Shirai N, Davis AD, Goldstein NE, Garde C, Paasche-Orlow GA, Sciacca K, Klein K, Hanson E, Sage A, Nielsen DS, Walker-Corkery B, El-Jawahri A, Barry MJ, Joel M, Platts-Mills T, Durieux BN, Kwok A, Tyler KR, Ouchi K. Effect of Emergency Department-Initiated Video-Enhanced Advance Care Planning on Documentation and Goal-Concordant Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s11606-026-10406-6. Online ahead of print. PMID 41998266

+Study documents

+Funding

NIH grants: R01AG065254