TrialReader


The Patient Positioning for Perineal Protection Study

NCT04616170 — Not applicable, Completed, 1206 participants, Massachusetts General Hospital

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT04616170, acronym 4P
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, prevention
Enrollment1206 (Actual)
SponsorMassachusetts General Hospital (Other)
ConditionsPerineal Tear, Delivery; Trauma, Perineal Laceration
InterventionsHip extension, Usual Care (Other)
Datesstart 2021-04-05, primary completion 2025-07-11, completion 2025-07-11, first posted 2020-11-04, last updated 2025-07-17
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Perineal Tear All trials for Delivery; Trauma All trials of Hip extension All trials of Usual Care

-Summary

It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to forcibly flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this forced stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. This study will examine whether extending the hips, as compared to usual care, at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery decreases maternal perineal trauma among nulliparous women.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Perineal trauma at the time of vaginal delivery is a significant cause of maternal morbidity including vaginal pain, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, infection, and social isolation in severe cases. There are well known risk factors in the literature for OASIS (obstetric anal sphincter injuries), however, this literature is by no means comprehensive. A prior RCT in 2012 looked at the role of patient positioning at the time of pushing and delivery to determine whether stirrup positioning and forced hip flexion leads to higher rates of any perineal tears. The study concluded that stirrup positioning did not lead to higher rates of perineal tearing but was not powered to evaluate the role of positioning on OASIS tears or on postpartum perineal morbidity.

In addition to lacking data with respect to patient positioning, data is limited regarding perineal morbidity beyond the traditional grading system of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree tears. 3rd and 4th degree lacerations are labeled as OASIS, however, perineal morbidity can result from "lower" orders of perineal tearing at the time of delivery. Prior studies have tried to illustrate various subsets of second degree lacerations in an attempt to subdivide 2nd degree lacerations into categories of severity, however, little has been done in practice with this form of division and little is written on the topic of perineal morbidity beyond OASIS tears.

It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. The closest studies to examine this have been in comparing women who deliver in the squatting position compared to in lithotomy. Those who deliver in squatting positions have been found to have deeper perineal lacerations, which demonstrate the possibility that forced flexion at the hips could lead to the same outcome in the lithotomy position. Should research show an increased risk of morbidity with this near universal positioning practice as compared to hip extension, this study could change practice patterns for the betterment of patients worldwide.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Usual careActive comparatorOther: Usual CarePatients in this arm will be randomized to the routine positioning instructions given at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery.
Hip extensionExperimentalOther: Hip extensionPatients in this arm will be randomized to hip extension at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery.
  • Hip extension (Other): Hips extended at the time of vaginal delivery
  • Usual Care (Other): Hips positioned in the "usual care" position per provider preference at the time of vaginal delivery

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Classification of perineal laceration [At the time of vaginal delivery]: The degree of perineal laceration as classified by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) classification system

Secondary outcomes

  • Rate of OASIS laceration [At the time of vaginal delivery]: Number of obstetric anal sphincter injury lacerations compared to all deliveries

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to 55 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Nulliparous women
* Non-anomalous fetuses
* Term gestation
* Vertex presentation
* Eligible for trial of labor

Exclusion Criteria:

* Multiparous women
* Prior perineal malformations
* History female genital mutilation
* Prior perineal surgery
* Anomalous fetuses
* Multiple gestations
* Fetal status incompatible with labor

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Massachusetts General HospitalBoston, MassachusettsUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Soffer MD, James KE, Liang P, Delgado A, Mossayebi MH, Hamp M, Siegel MR, Clapp MA, Kaimal AJ, Barth WH Jr. Effect of Hip Extension Compared With Usual Positioning on Perineal Lacerations During First Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2026 Sep 22. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006438. Online ahead of print. PMID 42771819

+Investigators

My Notes