Impact of Smoking Information on Concerns About Radon

NCT03499535 — Not applicable, Completed, 1390 participants, Paul Windschitl

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT03499535
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, factorial, masking: single, prevention
Enrollment1390 (Actual)
SponsorPaul Windschitl (Other)
ConditionsLung Neoplasms, Radon Exposure, Smoking, Intention, Risk Reduction Behavior
InterventionsRadon & Smoking Synergistic, Radon Only, Radon and Smoking Isolated, EPA, Idaho (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2015-08-07, primary completion 2016-04-22, completion 2016-04-22, first posted 2018-04-17, last updated 2019-04-19

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Lung Neoplasms All trials for Radon Exposure All trials of Radon & Smoking Synergistic All trials of Radon Only

-Summary

Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Despite a push for tailored messages, health communications are often aimed at, and viewed by, people with varying levels of risk. This project examined-in the context of radon risk messages-whether information relevant to high-risk individuals can have an unintended influence on lower-risk individuals. Specifically, the investigators assessed whether information about lung-cancer risk from smoking reduced concerns about lung-cancer risk from radon among nonsmokers. The investigators hypothesized that non-smokers who read a message that included smoking-relevant information would express less concern about the effects of radon exposure and less interest in testing their home compared to those who read a version in which smoking-relevant information was excluded. Two studies were conducted. Although the investigators did not exclude smokers, the focus was on participants self-identifying as nonsmokers (including never smokers and former smokers). Participants in both studies were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants viewed radon messages that varied in the information they communicated about smoking's effect on lung cancer. In Study 1, smoking information was included or excluded from messages assembled from existing radon pamphlets. In Study 2, versions of a new radon message either excluded smoking information, described smoking as a major cause of lung cancer, or also described smoking's synergistic effect with radon on lung cancer risk. After viewing a radon health message, participants completed a variety of measures. Primary measures assessed respondents' anticipated sense of concern and related reactions if they learned that they/their home had been exposed to elevated levels of radon. Other key measures included questions about participants' interest and intention to test their home for radon.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/EPAActive comparatorBehavioral: Radon & Smoking Synergistic; Behavioral: EPAParticipants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Study 1: Radon&Smoking Synergistic/IdahoActive comparatorBehavioral: Radon & Smoking Synergistic; Behavioral: IdahoParticipants viewed radon and smoking risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Study 1: Radon Only / EPAExperimentalBehavioral: Radon Only; Behavioral: EPAParticipants viewed only radon risk information taken from the EPA's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Study 1: Radon Only / IdahoExperimentalBehavioral: Radon Only; Behavioral: IdahoParticipants viewed only radon risk information taken from Idaho's Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on the dangers of radon gas exposure.
Study 2: Radon OnlyExperimentalBehavioral: Radon OnlyParticipants viewed a radon-only message that focused only on the effect of radon on lung-cancer risk.
Study 2: Radon and Smoking IsolatedOtherBehavioral: Radon and Smoking IsolatedParticipants viewed a radon-and-smoking-isolated message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking on lung cancer, but without mentioning their synergistic effect.
Study 2: Radon & Smoking SynergisticActive comparatorBehavioral: Radon & Smoking SynergisticParticipants viewed a radon-and-smoking-synergistic message that covered the individual effects of radon and of smoking but that also included information about their synergistic effect.
  • Radon & Smoking Synergistic (Behavioral): Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from exposure to radon gas, smoking, and their synergistic effects. This intervention represents the type of information most commonly presented in radon risk communications.
  • Radon Only (Behavioral): Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure. No information about the risks for developing lung cancer associated with smoking or its synergistic effect with radon exposure are included.
  • Radon and Smoking Isolated (Behavioral): Participants viewed health information detailing the risks of developing lung cancer from radon exposure and smoking. No information describing the synergistic effects of smoking and radon exposure on lung cancer risk are included.
  • EPA (Behavioral): Health information modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) pamphlet on radon risk.
  • Idaho (Behavioral): Health information modeled after the Idaho Department of Health and Human Welfare's pamphlet on radon risk.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Conditional Concern Composite [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 1 minute)]: Composite formed from 4 conditional questions assessing concern, perceived impact on risk and comparative risk, and threat--if exposed to radon
  • Interest in Testing Composite [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)]: Composite formed from 2 questions assessing importance and intention to test home for radon

Secondary outcomes

  • Worry Elicited by Health Message [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 2 minutes)]: Single question assessing worry elicited by the health communication material
  • Likelihood Judgments about Lung Cancer [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)]: Three items assessing perceived likelihood of developing lung cancer
  • Elect to Leave Email for Raffle [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)]: Participants given option to leave email address in case they won one of the 20 radon kits being raffled (Study 2).
  • Elect to Read More [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)]: Participants given option to be presented with more information at the end of the session about testing for radon (Study 2).
  • Concern about Loved Ones If Exposed to Radon [Immediately post-intervention (approx. 4 minutes)]: Rated how concerned they would be about loved ones if they learned their home had high radon (Study 2)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Live within the US
* Have an Amazon Mechanical Turk account (website where online study was posted)

Exclusion Criteria:

* None