TrialReader


Use of Local Intraoperative Steroid in MIS TLIF

NCT03308084 — Phase 3, Completed, 105 participants, Rush University Medical Center

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Effects of Intraoperative Local Steroid Utilization in a Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

RegistryNCT03308084
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 3
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, prevention
Enrollment105 (Actual)
SponsorRush University Medical Center (Other)
ConditionsDysphasia
InterventionsMethylprednisolone, Dexamethasone (Drug)
Datesstart 2015-11-13, primary completion 2019-05-03, completion 2019-05-03, first posted 2017-10-12, last updated 2020-11-20

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Dysphasia All trials of Methylprednisolone All trials of Dexamethasone

-Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the frequency and duration of postoperative pain are improved in participants receiving a local steroid injection (methylprednisolone) plus a systemic (intravenous (IV, by vein)) steroid (dexamethasone) when compared to those receiving a systemic (IV) steroid (dexamethasone) alone. Both of these steroid injections are already currently used at Rush and are considered standard of practice. It is well established that steroids have an anti-inflammatory (decreased swelling) effect on the soft tissue and it is routinely used in many types of surgery, but it is not known whether two steroids are better than one. The medications provided in this study are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Postoperative pain is a well-known complication following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). It has been found that up to 40% of lumbar spinal patients will have either recurrent or persistent postoperative pain. Several studies have demonstrated reduced patient reported pain scores following steroid administration. However, few studies have investigated intraoperative local injection of corticosteroid at the surgical site in an effort to reduce the incidence and duration of postoperative pain for MIS TLIF patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the incidence and duration of postoperative pain is improved in participants receiving a local injection of methylprednisolone with systemic dexamethasone when compared to those receiving the usual systemic dexamethasone undergoing MIS TLIF.

The investigators hypothesize that participants undergoing MIS TLIF who receive local methylprednisolone along with the systemic dexamethasone will have:

1. Reduced incidence and duration of postoperative pain compared to participants receiving only systemic dexamethasone.
2. Shorter hospital stay compared to participants receiving only systemic dexamethasone.
3. Better short- and long-term outcomes compared to participants receiving only systemic dexamethasone

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Local Depomedrol plus IV dexamethasoneActive comparatorDrug: Methylprednisolone; Drug: DexamethasoneLocal intraoperative application of methylprednisolone (Depomedrol) plus standard systemic (IV) dexamethasone
IV dexamethasonePlacebo comparatorDrug: DexamethasoneStandard systemic (IV) dexamethasone only
  • Methylprednisolone (Drug): Application of 80mg Depomedrol (methylprednisolone acetate) suspension into the transforaminal space prior to incision closure
  • Dexamethasone (Drug): Administration of 10mg Dexamethasone IV intraoperatively

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Postoperative Pain [2 years postoperative]: Change in Visual Analogue Scale Back and Leg score from preoperative value will be assessed

Secondary outcomes

  • Physical Functioning [2 years postoperative]: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score as compared to preoperative value
  • Disability [2 years postoperative]: Oswestry Disability Index score as compared to preoperative score
  • General health status [2 years postoperative]: Short Form-12 Survey scores as compared to preoperative value
  • Narcotic Consumption [1 week postoperative]: The total amount of narcotic use for each subject will be recorded. Dosages of narcotics will be converted to morphine equivalents
  • Length of Stay [1 week postoperative]: The number of hours of hospitalization from entering the recovery room (time zero) until patient meets discharge criteria.
  • Intra-operative adverse events [day of surgery]: Blood loss, length of surgery, procedural details, complications
  • Post-operative adverse events [1 week postoperative]: Post-operative nausea and vomiting, Gastro-esophageal reflux, Ileus, Venous thromboembolic events, Respiratory depression/airway compromise, Renal insufficiency, Wound Complications, Admission to the ICU

+Eligibility

Sex: All, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients undergoing a primary 1- to 2-level MIS TLIF
* Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, stenosis, herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes, and foraminal stenosis
* Patients able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Allergies or other contraindications to medicines in the protocol including:

  (a) Existing history of gastrointestinal bleeding
* Current Smokers
* Lumbar spine trauma
* Bilateral cages
* Lack of consent

+Publications

  • Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1683-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0687-8. Epub 2008 Nov 21. PMID 19023571
  • McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Lerner J, Engelhart L, Knight T, Wang MY. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jun;14(6):771-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.SPINE10571. Epub 2011 Mar 18. PMID 21417699
  • Ranguis SC, Li D, Webster AC. Perioperative epidural steroids for lumbar spine surgery in degenerative spinal disease. A review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Dec;13(6):745-57. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.SPINE09796. PMID 21121754
  • Jamjoom BA, Jamjoom AB. Efficacy of intraoperative epidural steroids in lumbar discectomy: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 5;15:146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-146. PMID 24885519
  • Debi R, Halperin N, Mirovsky Y. Local application of steroids following lumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Aug;15(4):273-6. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200208000-00002. PMID 12177541
  • Results publication: Haws BE, Khechen B, Patel DV, Bawa MS, Ahn J, Bohl DD, Mayo BC, Massel DH, Guntin JA, Cardinal KL, Singh K. Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 9;30(2):222-227. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18584. Print 2019 Feb 1. PMID 30497132

+Investigators

  • Kern Singh, MD, Principal investigator, Rush University Medical Center

My Notes