TrialReader


Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Back Pain- Pilot Sudy

NCT03243084 — Not applicable, Completed, 21 participants, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

RegistryNCT03243084, acronym BPS
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, crossover, masking: double, basic science
Enrollment21 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Other); collaborators: National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain
InterventionsXCSITE100 Stimulator Sham, XCSITE100 Stimulator tACS (Device)
Datesstart 2017-09-07, primary completion 2017-12-31, completion 2018-01-10, first posted 2017-08-08, last updated 2018-12-12
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Chronic Low Back Pain All trials of XCSITE100 Stimulator Sham All trials of XCSITE100 Stimulator tACS

-Summary

Chronic pain is a severe disabling problem within society, affecting 25-30% of the United States population.. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has the potential to provide a treatment option that is safe, scientifically-supported, low-cost, and easy-to-administer method to effectively reduce symptoms in patients suffering from chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of using tACS to treat patients with chronic pain, and to collect pilot efficacy as well as EEG and EKG biomarker data for optimizing the design of subsequent large-scale studies. The treatment rationale is to renormalize the presumed pathological structure of alpha oscillations in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of patients with chronic pain.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Sham tACSSham comparatorDevice: XCSITE100 Stimulator ShamSham Stimulation mimics the physical effects of stimulation, with up to one minute of stimulation during the session. Sham stimulation is delivered using the XCSITE100 Stimulator Sham.
Active 10 Hz tACSActive comparatorDevice: XCSITE100 Stimulator tACSParticipants will receive 2mA of alternating current stimulation at a frequency of 10Hz for 40 minutes. tACS stimulation is delivered using the XCSITE100 Stimulator tACS.
  • XCSITE100 Stimulator Sham (Device), also known as Sham tACS: The participant will receive up to one minute of tACS stimulation until the stimulation fades. Sham stimulation mimics the skin sensations a participant would experience during a tACS session
  • XCSITE100 Stimulator tACS (Device), also known as tACS: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a method of noninvasive brain stimulation in which weak electrical current are applied to the scalp in a sine wave pattern to induce cortical oscillations at the frequency at which they are applied

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Heart Rate Variability Before and After 40-minute Stimulation [before and after 40-minute stimulation at each session]: Changes in parasympathetic tone, increase in high frequency band input via spectral analysis on EKG recordings between active and sham stimulation
  • Change in Electroencephalogram Power in Alpha Band Before and After 40-minute Stimulation [5 minute recordings before and after each 40-minute stimulation at each session.]: Changes in the EEG power in the alpha (8-12 Hz) band before and after 40-minute stimulation

Secondary outcomes

  • Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale Before and After 40-minute Stimulation [before and after 40 minute stimulation session]: Self reported pain rating using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 done before and after stimulation with '0' being no pain and '10' as bad as it could be. Lower values represent a better outcome. (Pain difference was normalized using modulation index to account for ordinal scale)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Male or female, aged 18-65
* Diagnosed with nonspecific chronic low back pain by clinician
* BMI is less than 30
* Suffered from chronic pain for > 6 months
* Self-report pain measures >4
* Meets criteria for low depression and suicide risk as defined by the Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale
* Capacity to understand all relevant risks and potential benefits of the study (informed consent)
* Not currently taking opioids, benzodiazepines, and anticonvulsant medications

Exclusion Criteria:

* Radicular Pain
* Traumatic brain injury, Any brain devices/implants, including cochlear implants and aneurysm clips
* History of major neurological or psychiatric illness, including epilepsy
* (For females) Pregnancy or breast feeding
* Diagnosis of eating disorder (current or within the past 6 months), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (lifetime), or Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (currently under treatment)

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneSham Then Active 10 Hz tACSActive 10 Hz Then Sham tACS
Started1110
Completed1110
Not completed00

Outcome results

  • Change in Heart Rate Variability Before and After 40-minute Stimulation (Primary), Mean, ms^2: Sham tACS 0.206 +/- 0.76; Active10 Hz tACS -0.01 +/- 0.56 (p .319)
  • Change in Electroencephalogram Power in Alpha Band Before and After 40-minute Stimulation (Primary), Mean, square microvolts: Sham tACS 0.03 +/- 0.16; Active 10 Hz tACS 0.4 +/- 0.15
  • Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale Before and After 40-minute Stimulation (Secondary), Mean, units on a scale: Sham tACS -0.178 +/- 0.97; Active 10 Hz tACS 0.18 +/- 0.31 (p .0488)

Adverse events

Time frame: Study enrollment until 2 day followup after last session

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Sham tACS0/21 (0.0%)0/21 (0.0%)0/21 (0.0%)
Active 10 Hz tACS0/20 (0.0%)0/20 (0.0%)0/20 (0.0%)

Limitations and caveats: Limitations of the study include small sample size. Participants received only 1 session of Active 10 Hz tACS by design but there is likely an additive effect and future studies should investigate multiple sessions.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of North Carolina Chapel HillChapel Hill, North CarolinaUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Prim JH, Ahn S, Davila MI, Alexander ML, McCulloch KL, Frohlich F. Targeting the Autonomic Nervous System Balance in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. J Pain Res. 2019 Dec 11;12:3265-3277. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S208030. eCollection 2019. PMID 31849514
  • Results publication: Ahn S, Prim JH, Alexander ML, McCulloch KL, Frohlich F. Identifying and Engaging Neuronal Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study. J Pain. 2019 Mar;20(3):277.e1-277.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 27. PMID 30268803

+Study documents

+Investigators

+Funding

NIH grants: R01MH101547

My Notes