TrialReader


Efficacy of OSTENIL PLUS (Hyaluronic Acid) Versus SYNVISC-ONE in Patients With Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis

NCT03203408 — Not applicable, Completed, 290 participants, TRB Chemedica

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Efficacy of OSTENIL PLUS (Hyaluronic Acid) Versus SYNVISC-ONE in Patients With Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis. A Randomised, Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study With a 6-month Follow-up

RegistryNCT03203408
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, treatment
Enrollment290 (Actual)
SponsorTRB Chemedica (Industry)
ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis
InterventionsOSTENIL PLUS, SYNVISC-ONE (Device)
Datesstart 2011-06-21, primary completion 2012-11-22, completion 2012-11-22, first posted 2017-06-29, last updated 2017-10-11

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Knee Osteoarthritis All trials of OSTENIL PLUS All trials of SYNVISC-ONE

-Summary

The main objective of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS compared to that of a single intra-articular injection of the reference product SYNVISC-ONE in the treatment of symptomatic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. The primary endpoint was the change in mean score on the WOMAC pain scales from D0 to D180.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

After a period of washout-out for NSAIDs, the patients received a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS or of SYNVISC-ONE in the most painful knee. The study involved a preselection visit at D-7 and five further visits: at D0 (baseline, evaluation before intra-articular injection), at D2 ± 2 days (injection), at D30 ± 15 days, at D90 ± 15 days and C5 at D180 ± 15 days.

To enrol the patients as quickly as possible, 129 sites, i.e. general medical or rheumatology practices, were open. After verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the evaluating investigators assigned a randomisation number based on the chronological order of inclusion of patients at their site. The patient was then sent to the injecting investigator so that he/she could give the injection of the product corresponding to the randomisation number.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
OSTENIL PLUSExperimentalDevice: OSTENIL PLUSA single intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate 40 mg/2.0 ml at Day 2, i.e. 2 days post Baseline (Day 0 = Week 0)
SYNVISC-ONEActive comparatorDevice: SYNVISC-ONEA single intra-articular injection of hylan G-F 20 48 mg/6 ml at Day 2, i.e. 2 days post Baseline (Day 0 = Week 0)
  • OSTENIL PLUS (Device): Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee
  • SYNVISC-ONE (Device): Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in WOMAC A [Day 0 to Day 180]: Change from baseline in the pain subscore (section A) of the WOMAC score

Secondary outcomes

  • Lequesne algofunctional index [Day 0 to Day 180]: Index assessing the severity of osteoarthritis
  • WOMAC B [Day 0 to Day 180]: Stiffness subscore (section B) of the WOMAC score
  • WOMAC C [Day 0 to Day 180]: Function subscore (section C) of the WOMAC score
  • Patient's overall status score in relation to his/her knee osteoarthritis [Day 0 to Day 180]: Visual analogue scale assessed by the patient
  • Assessment of overall treatment efficacy by the patient [Day 30 to Day 180]: 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)
  • Assessment of overall treatment efficacy by the investigator [Day 30 to Day 180]: 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)

Other outcomes

  • Incidence of all adverse events [Day 0 to Day 180]: Recording of all adverse events and changes in concomitant treatments
  • Incidence of local adverse reactions [Day 30]: Recording of adverse manifestations such as post-injection pain, inflammatory reaction, presence of hydrarthrosis, presence of acute pseudoseptic or septic arthritis
  • Assessment of local treatment tolerability by the patient [Day 30]: 5-point scale scale (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3= moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor)
  • Assessment of local treatment tolerability by the investigator [Day 30]: 5-point scale scale (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3= moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor)
  • Assessment of overall treatment tolerability by the investigator [Day 30 to Day 180]: 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)
  • Assessment of overall treatment tolerability by the patient [Day 30 to Day 180]: 5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 40 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Male or female aged 40-85 years;
* Primary knee osteoarthritis complying with the American College or Rheumatology criteria;
* Radiographically defined osteoarthritis: joint space narrowing and osteophyte in X-ray taken less than one year previously and modified Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ib-III;
* Symptoms on one side only, with a mean WOMAC A of ≥40 mm. If knee osteoarthritis is bilateral, a difference for that score between the contralateral knee and the selected knee should be of at least 20 mm;
* Pain present on at least 15 days in the month before inclusion;
* Failure or intolerance of first line analgesics and NSAIDs;
* With health insurance;
* Understanding and following the study instructions;
* Signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Knee osteoarthritis that is not symptomatic or insufficiently symptomatic;
* Bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis of the same severity on both sides;
* Post-traumatic secondary knee osteoarthritis;
* Knee osteoarthritis of radiographic grade I, Ia or IV;
* Exclusively patellofemoral osteoarthritis where the symptoms are principally of patellofemoral origin (Patellar syndrome);
* Symptomatic homolateral coxarthrosis;
* Varus or valgus deformation of the selected knee (deformation axis ≥15° in X-ray);
* Inflammatory rheumatism (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic rheumatism, articular chondrocalcinosis, gout, Paget's disease, ankylosing spondylitis, lupus, etc.);
* History of injury to the selected knee during the 6 months before inclusion;
* Venous or lymphatic stenosis of the lower limb;
* Femoral or sciatic nerve root pain of the lower limb to be tested;
* Tendinopathy (e.g. hip periarthritis);
* Treatment with intra-articular hyaluronic acid in the selected knee during the 6 months before inclusion;
* Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in the selected knee during the 2 months before inclusion;
* Treatment with symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis and/or dietary supplements for osteoarthritis (chondroitin sulphate, diacerein, avocado and soybean unsaponifiables, oxaceprol, copper granions, glucosamine) which had been started less than 3 months previously or whose dose had been changed during the last 3 months before inclusion;
* Total knee replacement of the selected knee;
* Surgery of the other knee or of the hip or any other surgery scheduled during the period of the study;
* History of any surgical intervention, arthroscopy, osteotomy, etc. in the year before inclusion;
* Obesity: body mass index ≥30 kg/m2;
* History of autoimmune disease;
* Severe condition likely to interfere with the evaluation, such as neoplasia, malignant blood disease, kidney disease, liver disease or severe infection;
* Very marked hydrarthrosis (requiring puncture) at the time of inclusion;
* Wound or skin condition of the selected knee;
* Anticoagulant treatment with heparin or warfarin (platelet antiaggregants such as ASPIRIN ≤325 mg/d, ticlopidine or clopidogrel were allowed);
* Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid and/or to avian proteins and/or paracetamol;
* Known hypersensitivity to mannitol;
* Participation in a clinical research study within the previous 3 months;
* Pregnancy, breast-feeding.

+Investigators

  • Renée Liliane Dreiser, Dr, Study chair, APHP Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
  • Bernard Avouac, Dr, Study chair, APHP Henri Mondor, Creteil, France
  • Thomas Bardin, Prof., Principal investigator, APHP Lariboisière, Paris, France

My Notes