Comparison of Two Different Surgical Approaches To Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness

NCT02450383 — Phase 4, Completed, 20 participants, University of Iowa

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Comparison of Two Different Surgical Approaches to Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

RegistryNCT02450383
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment20 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of Iowa (Other); collaborators: BioHorizons, Inc.
ConditionsTooth Loss, Peri-implant Mucosa Defect
InterventionsAcellular Dermal Matrix, Autologous subepithelial connective tissue graft (Drug, procedure)
Datesstart 2015-01-01, primary completion 2016-09-01, completion 2016-09-01, first posted 2015-05-21, last updated 2017-10-18
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Tooth Loss All trials for Peri-implant Mucosa Defect All trials of Acellular Dermal Matrix All trials of Autologous subepithelial connective tissue graft

-Summary

The purpose of this non-inferiority trial is to determine the clinical efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in the augmentation of the gum around dental implants as compared to an autologous gum graft (sCTG) obtained from the palate (roof of the mouth) in human adults.

AlloDerm is regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as human tissue for transplantation. AlloDerm is processed and marketed in accordance with the FDA's requirements for banked human tissue (21 CFR, Part 1270 and Part 1271) and Standards for Tissue Banking of the American Association of Tissue Banks (AATB).

Twenty adult subjects will be recruited who are in need of dental implant placement with simultaneous gum grafting to increase the thickness of the facial mucosa. Half of the subjects will be randomized to the ADM group and half will be randomized to the sCTG group. The surgical intervention will be performed according to the protocol and subjects will return for follow-up 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks post-surgery for follow-up measurements of healing, gum thickness, subject perception of pain, and esthetic photographs.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Although little is known about the influence of peri-implant mucosa thickness (PMT) on long-term biologic outcomes, soft tissue thickness is a critical component to esthetic dental implant restorations. While the subepithelial connective tissue graft (sCTG) has been recognized as the gold standard for gingival augmentation, several studies have reported acellular dermal matrix (ADM) may produce similar outcomes. Healthy patients with a thin biotype were selected on the basis of an eligibility criteria and randomized to the control (sCTG) or test (ADM) group. Measurements were completed by a masked examiner at baseline and at implant uncovering. Patient reported outcomes were recorded, as well. A power analysis suggested 20 subjects be recruited. The gain in PMT at 1mm, 3mm and 5mm from the expected CEJ and recipient site wound dehiscence were measured and recorded in both groups at different time points by a calibrated, masked examiner. Patient-related outcome measures (PROMs), such as pain and level of satisfaction with final outcome, were also recorded for all study participants.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
ControlActive comparatorProcedure: Autologous subepithelial connective tissue graftAutologous subepithelial connective tissue graft
ExperimentalExperimentalDrug: Acellular Dermal MatrixAcellular Dermal Matrix
  • Acellular Dermal Matrix (Drug), also known as Alloderm®: Placement of acellular dermal matrix (Alloderm®) on the buccal/coronal aspect of the alveolar ridge at the time of implant placement, following a two-stage approach
  • Autologous subepithelial connective tissue graft (Procedure), also known as sCTG: Placement of autologous subepithelial connective tissue graft on the buccal/coronal aspect of the alveolar ridge at the time of implant placement, following a two-stage approach

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Buccal Peri-implant Mucosa Thickness Between Baseline and 16 Weeks After Surgery [Baseline and 16 weeks after baseline]: Buccal mucosa thickness measurements were obtained by a calibrated, masked examiner using a custom-made stent and an endo file for precision and reproducibility between different time points

Secondary outcomes

  • Changes in Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Width (Apico-coronal) at 16 Weeks After Surgery [Baseline to 16 weeks after baseline]
  • Patient-perceived Discomfort, Measured by VAS [2 weeks]: Patient-reported outcome measures of perceived discomfort using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximum pain) were recorded
  • Wound Healing, Measured Using a Standardized Visual Wound Healing Index [2 weeks]: Wound healing status was evaluated by the same calibrated clinician using a standardized visual wound healing index at different time points A simple wound healing scoring system including 3 categories was used: 1- uneventful wound healing, 2- slight gingival edema, erythema or discomfort, 3- poor wound healing

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

* Age: 18 to 80 years.
* Subjects must be able and willing to follow instructions related to the study procedures.
* Subjects must have read, understood and signed an informed consent form.
* At least one single-tooth edentulous site, with adjacent natural teeth, planned for tooth replacement therapy with an implant-supported restoration.

Exclusion criteria:

* Reported allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the products to be used in the study.
* Severe hematologic disorders, such as hemophilia or leukemia.
* Active severe infectious diseases that may compromise normal healing.
* Liver or kidney dysfunction/failure.
* Currently under cancer treatment or within 18 months from completion of radio- or chemotherapy.
* Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes, defined as Hba1c > 6.5% (According to the American Diabetes Association 2014 Guidelines)
* Pregnant women or nursing mothers.
* Smokers: Subjects who have smoked within 6 months of study onset.
* Concomitant medications for systemic conditions that may affect the outcomes of the study.
* Any other non-specified reason that from the point of view of the investigators will make a candidate not a suitable subject for the study (e.g. limited mouth opening).

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneControlExperimental
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00

Outcome results

  • Change in Buccal Peri-implant Mucosa Thickness Between Baseline and 16 Weeks After Surgery (Primary), Mean, millimeters: Control 0.44 +/- 2.04; Experimental 0.05 +/- 1.57
  • Changes in Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Width (Apico-coronal) at 16 Weeks After Surgery (Secondary), Mean, millimeters: Control -0.85 +/- 1.13; Experimental -0.45 +/- 1.30
  • Patient-perceived Discomfort, Measured by VAS (Secondary), Mean, units on a scale: Control 23.60 +/- 24.71; Experimental 10.10 +/- 7.78
  • Wound Healing, Measured Using a Standardized Visual Wound Healing Index (Secondary), Mean, units on a scale: Control 1.70 +/- 0.48; Experimental 1.90 +/- 0.57

Adverse events

Time frame: Baseline intervention to 16 weeks after baseline

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Control0/10 (0.0%)0/10 (0.0%)7/10 (70.0%)
Experimental0/10 (0.0%)0/10 (0.0%)3/10 (30.0%)

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemControlExperimental
Early Wound DehiscenceSurgical and medical procedures7/103/10

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Iowa College of Dentistry - Craniofacial Clinical Research Center and Department of PeriodonticsIowa City, IowaUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Hutton CG, Johnson GK, Barwacz CA, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2018 Jul;89(7):807-814. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0597. Epub 2018 Jul 20. PMID 29633268

+Investigators