Acceptability of the NuvaRing Among Students

NCT00635570 — Phase 4, Completed, 273 participants, University of Chicago

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Acceptability of the NuvaRing Among College and Graduate Students

RegistryNCT00635570, acronym ACCEPT
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, other
Enrollment273 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of Chicago (Other); collaborators: Organon
ConditionsBirth Control Compliance
InterventionsOrtho Tri-cyclen Lo, NuvaRing (Drug, device)
Datesstart 2008-07-01, primary completion 2009-01-01, completion 2009-07-01, first posted 2008-03-13, last updated 2021-02-03
Locations3 sites in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Birth Control Compliance All trials of Ortho Tri-cyclen Lo All trials of NuvaRing

-Summary

The ACCEPT study is a Phase IV trial in which women are randomized to either the NuvaRing® vaginal contraceptive ring or a low dose oral contraceptive to assess compliance, side effects, overall acceptability and intent to continue use of the method. The study is focused on the acceptability of the vaginal ring among female undergraduate or graduate students.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

For many women, college is a time of great change that affects one's social and behavioral practices, including sexual behavior. The first part of the NuvaRing ® Acceptability study is an online survey, developed in conjunction with the University of Illinois's Survey Research Laboratory, which examines women's attitudes and beliefs regarding various methods of birth control. The second part of the study is a comparison trial in which the women are randomized to either the NuvaRing ® vaginal contraceptive ring or a low dose oral contraceptive. The women are followed for three months to assess compliance, side effects, overall acceptability and intent to continue use of the method. Ultimately, we would like college women to be well informed about various methods of contraception available to them and to choose the contraceptive method that best suits their lifestyle.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Contraceptive vaginal ringActive comparatorDevice: NuvaRingContraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing)
Oral contraceptive pillActive comparatorDrug: Ortho Tri-cyclen LoOral contraceptive pill (Ortho Tri-cyclen Lo)
  • Ortho Tri-cyclen Lo (Drug): Low dose oral contraceptive
  • NuvaRing (Device): Contraceptive vaginal ring

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Adherence Rate (Rate of Perfect Method Use) [For the first 3 months]: "Perfect use" was defined as reporting never missing a pill or never removing the contraceptive vaginal ring for more than 2 hours during days 1-21 of all three monthly cycles

Secondary outcomes

  • Satisfaction Rate [at 3 months]
  • Continuation Rate [at 3 months]: Rate of intention to continue the contraceptive method at 3 months

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* over 18
* student enrolled in college or graduate program
* Not have used the contraceptive patch or oral contraceptives within the last month
* Never have used a contraceptive vaginal ring
* Interested in using hormonal contraceptives, specifically NuvaRing and oral contraceptive pills for next 3 months
* In general good health
* Premenopausal with the ability to menstruate

Exclusion Criteria:

* Known or suspected pregnancy
* Pregnancy within 2 months of trial medication
* Past use of any contraceptive vaginal ring
* Hypersensitivity or allergy to NuvaRing or Oral Contraceptives
* Use of investigational drug within 2 months of start of trial medication
* Use of the contraceptive patch or oral contraceptives within past month
* Use of any injectable contraception within 6 months of trial medication
* Planning pregnancy in next 6 months

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneContraceptive Vaginal RingOral Contraceptive Pill
Started136137
Completed121126
Not completed1511

Outcome results

  • Adherence Rate (Rate of Perfect Method Use) (Primary), Number, Percentage of Participants: Contraceptive Vaginal Ring 57; Oral Contraceptive Pill 45 (p 0.05)
  • Satisfaction Rate (Secondary), Number, Percentage of Participants: Contraceptive Vaginal Ring 68; Oral Contraceptive Pill 71 (p >0.05)
  • Continuation Rate (Secondary), Number, Percentage of Participants: Contraceptive Vaginal Ring 43; Oral Contraceptive Pill 52 (p >0.05)
  • Continuation Rate (Post hoc), Number, Percentage of Participants: Contraceptive Vaginal Ring 26; Oral Contraceptive Pill 29 (p >0.05)

Adverse events

Time frame: 6 months

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Contraceptive Vaginal Ring00/136 (0.0%)100/136 (73.5%)
Oral Contraceptive Pill00/137 (0.0%)105/137 (76.6%)

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemContraceptive Vaginal RingOral Contraceptive Pill
BloatingGastrointestinal disorders73/13678/137
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders83/13669/137
Weight gainInvestigations16/13618/137
HeadachesNervous system disorders93/136102/137
Breast swellingReproductive system and breast disorders71/13682/137
Irregular menstruationReproductive system and breast disorders14/13611/137
Vaginal discomfortReproductive system and breast disorders75/13658/137
Vaginal dischargeReproductive system and breast disorders46/13615/137

Limitations and caveats: This study is an randomized controlled trial offering internal but not necessarily external validity. Thus, we do not know whether these findings would be replicable in other populations.

+Locations (3)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Chicago, Section of Family PlanningChicago, IllinoisUnited States
University of ChicagoChicago, IllinoisUnited States
University of IllinoisChicago, IllinoisUnited States

+Publications

  • Gilliam M, Holmquist S, Berlin A. Factors associated with willingness to use the contraceptive vaginal ring. Contraception. 2007 Jul;76(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.03.009. Epub 2007 May 24. PMID 17586133
  • Results publication: Gilliam ML, Neustadt A, Kozloski M, Mistretta S, Tilmon S, Godfrey E. Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):503-510. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45dc. PMID 20177280

+Investigators