Orvosi hetilap  ·  2025

ABSTRACT
The manuscript addresses the social, clinical, and institutional dimensions of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with particular emphasis on the problem of medicalization and controversies surrounding pharmacological treatment. It briefly summarizes the discrepancies in epidemiological literature across countries and age groups and critically analyzes selected aspects of DSM-5 criteria (e.g., the undefined threshold for "often"). The paper highlights that the expansion of diagnoses is partly driven by institutional, economic, and cultural factors, including educational expectations, access to healthcare, and pharmaceutical interests. It provides a detailed discussion of the benefits and risks of methylphenidate, the issue of misuse, and the role of atomoxetine as an alternative. Shortages of system capacity, lack of specialists, and pressures on primary care are emphasized. Illustrative clinical vignettes are presented, though the author underscores their anecdotal nature and cautions against overgeneralization. The concluding section offers consistent recommendations: avoiding liberalization of methylphenidate prescribing and/or introducing stricter centralized control, concentrating the management of severe cases in designated centres, and strengthening psychosocial interventions as well as school- and young adult-related support systems. The paper is intended as a position piece and a contribution to a possible ongoing debate. Orv Hetil. 2025; 166(49): 1935-1942.

 Paraphrase     Questionfy     Wikify     Simplify     Summarize


year_of_publication2025
sourceOrvosi hetilap

AI Reader
upload a document and start your AI-powered reading
AI Writer
you focus on what matters the most, we handle the rest
Daily Digest
get customized highlights of the latest research & news