Trial Comparing CPDMA Versus Standard Breadloafing in WLE Specimens of Stage 1-II Cutaneous Melanoma

NCT07869381 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 282 participants, University of Nebraska

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Comprehensive Peripheral Deep Margin Assessment Versus Standard Breadloafing in Wide Local Excision Specimens of Clinical Stage I-II Cutaneous Melanoma

RegistryNCT07869381
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, diagnostic
Enrollment282 (Estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Nebraska (Other)
ConditionsCutaneous Melanoma, Stage II, Cutaneous Melanoma, Acral Melanoma
InterventionsWide Local Excision (Diagnostic test)
Datesstart 2026-12-24 (estimated), primary completion 2029-12-24 (estimated), completion 2031-12-24 (estimated), first posted 2026-10-09, last updated 2026-10-09
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Cutaneous Melanoma, Stage II All trials for Cutaneous Melanoma All trials of Wide Local Excision

-Summary

The primary goal of this clinical trial is to is to compare the rate of positive peripheral margins in wide local excision (WLE) performed to allow for comprehensive peripheral and deep margin assessment (CPDMA) assessment versus WLE performed with the intent of standard breadloafing of stage I-II cutaneous melanoma specimens. Secondary aims are to compare local recurrence at 1 and 2 years, the rate of re-excision due to positive margins, pathology turnaround time, pathology resource utilization, and cost per case between the two assessment methods. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does WLE performed to allow for CPDMA have a higher rate of positive peripheral margins than wide local excision performed with the intent of standard breadloafing?
* Will more complete positive margin detection support more appropriate re-excision and lower local recurrence over two years?
* Does CPDMA require greater pathology resource utilization and longer turnaround time than breadloafing?

Researchers will compare standard breadloafing (control) arm to CPDMA (experimental) arm.

Participants will:

* Undergo WLE.
* Attend a follow-up visit at 4 months.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Standard BreadloafingActive comparatorDiagnostic Test: Wide Local ExcisionControl Arm
Comprehensive Peripheral and Deep Margin AssessmentExperimentalDiagnostic Test: Wide Local ExcisionExperimental Arm
  • Wide Local Excision (Diagnostic test): Wide Local Excision

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Rate of positive peripheral margins [1 Month]: Tumor present at or near inked margin

Secondary outcomes

  • Local recurrence rate [1 and 2 years post-WLE]: In situ or invasive melanoma within 2 cm of the scar from treatment of the primary tumor
  • Re-excision rate [2 months post-WLE, documented at 4-month post-WLE visit]: Need for repeat surgical intervention of the primary site to attain additional margins within 60 days of the index surgery
  • Pathology turnaround time [Post-pathology report or 4-month follow-up]: From WLE date to final pathology report date
  • Pathology resource utilization [Post-pathology report or 4-month follow-up]: Number of tissue blocks and slides used
  • Pathologist time [1 Month]: Start of specimen review to end of specimen review
  • Technician time [1 Month]: Opening container to closing the block
  • Cost per case [2 years post-WLE]: Total amount billed

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 19 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥19 years
* Histologically confirmed clinical Stage I or II cutaneous melanoma, inclusive of acral melanoma
* Candidate for guideline (NCCN) concordant wide local excision
* Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Prior wide local excision of the lesion
* History of melanoma
* Melanoma lesions at more than one site
* Prior radiation therapy to the site
* Pregnancy or lactation

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmaha, NebraskaUnited States

+Investigators