Comparative Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
| Registry | NCT07853482, acronym RCT-TAP-ESP-CS |
|---|---|
| Status | Not yet recruiting |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, treatment |
| Enrollment | 162 (Estimated) |
| Sponsor | Maternity Hospital - State Budgetary Institution of the Rostov Region, Taganrog (Other gov); collaborators: I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University |
| Conditions | Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section |
| Interventions | Ropivacaine, Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block, Ketoprofen and Paracetamol, Trimeperidine (Rescue), Ultrasound-guided ESP Block, Ultrasound-guided TAP Block (Drug, procedure) |
| Dates | start 2026-10-15 (estimated), primary completion 2027-05-10 (estimated), completion 2027-06-10 (estimated), first posted 2026-10-01, last updated 2026-10-06 |
| Locations | 1 site in Russia |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section All trials of Ropivacaine All trials of Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block
This study compares the effectiveness of two ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (TAP block and ESP block) versus standard pain management for relieving pain after a planned cesarean section.
Cesarean delivery often causes moderate to severe pain, which can be divided into somatic pain (from the abdominal incision) and visceral pain (from uterine contractions and internal tissues). While transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are commonly used, erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a newer technique that may provide better relief for visceral pain.
In this randomized controlled trial, 162 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia will be assigned to one of three groups:
1. Bilateral ESP block at the L1 level;
2. Bilateral TAP block;
3. Standard analgesia without nerve blocks.
The primary goal is to determine which method provides better control of visceral pain in the first 16 hours after surgery. Secondary goals include assessing somatic pain, time to first mobilization, time to first skin-to-skin contact with the baby, and the need for additional rescue pain medication. The study aims to support early recovery and improve mother-infant bonding by optimizing postoperative pain control.
Background:
Postoperative pain after cesarean delivery has a dual nature: a somatic component resulting from the abdominal wall incision and a visceral component arising from uterine contraction and tissue trauma (innervated by Th10-L1 segments). According to PROSPECT (2021) guidelines, multimodal analgesia is the standard of care. Interfascial plane blocks, such as the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block and the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block, have shown efficacy in controlling somatic pain. However, data comparing their differential efficacy on visceral versus somatic pain components are limited. The ESP block, performed at the L1 level, theoretically offers superior visceral analgesia due to the spread of local anesthetic to the dorsal rami of spinal nerves and potential craniocaudal spread into the paravertebral/epidural space.
Study Design:
This is a prospective, single-center, randomized, single-blind controlled trial conducted at the Maternity Hospital in Taganrog, Rostov Oblast, Russia. A total of 162 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three parallel groups:
1. ESP Block Group: Patients will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block at the L1 level in the post-anesthesia care unit. 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine will be injected on each side (total 40 mL).
2. TAP Block Group: Patients will receive a bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block in the post-anesthesia care unit. 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine will be injected on each side (total 40 mL).
3. Control Group: Patients will receive standard postoperative analgesia without interfascial blocks. This includes ketoprofen 100 mg IM at 4 hours, and oral paracetamol + ketoprofen at 12 hours. Rescue analgesia (trimeperidine 20 mg IM) will be provided if the pain score exceeds 4 on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
All patients will undergo spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (2.2 mL) at the L2-L3 interspace. Preoperatively, pain threshold will be assessed using Nevidimova's method.
Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome is the intensity of visceral pain measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours postoperatively. Visceral pain is defined as dull, cramping lower abdominal pain.
Secondary outcomes include:
* Intensity of somatic pain (NRS 0-10) at the same time points.
* Time to independent mobilization (hours).
* Time to first mother-infant skin-to-skin contact (hours).
* Consumption of rescue analgesia (number of trimeperidine injections).
* Incidence of adverse events (hypotension, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity).
Statistical Analysis:
Based on a power analysis (80% power, α=0.05), a minimum of 54 patients per group (162 total) is required to detect a clinically significant difference of 1.5 points in visceral pain scores. Data will be analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for between-group comparisons and the Friedman test for within-group dynamics. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations:
The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All participants will provide written informed consent. Personal data will be coded and stored securely. The study has been approved by the Local Ethics Committee of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: ESP Block Group | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine; Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block; Drug: Ketoprofen and Paracetamol; Procedure: Ultrasound-guided ESP Block | Participants receive baseline multimodal analgesia (ketoprofen + paracetamol) PLUS bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block at L1 level (20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side). No trimeperidine is administered in this group. |
| Experimental: TAP Block Group | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine; Procedure: Ultrasound-guided Nerve Block; Drug: Ketoprofen and Paracetamol; Procedure: Ultrasound-guided TAP Block | Participants receive baseline multimodal analgesia (ketoprofen + paracetamol) PLUS bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block (20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine per side). No trimeperidine is administered in this group. |
| Active Comparator: Standard Analgesia Group | Active comparator | Drug: Ketoprofen and Paracetamol; Drug: Trimeperidine (Rescue) | Participants receive baseline multimodal analgesia (ketoprofen + paracetamol) WITHOUT interfascial blocks. Rescue analgesia with trimeperidine 20 mg IM is available if NRS > 4. |
Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to 40 Years
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Women aged 18 to 40 years. 2. ASA physical status I-II. 3. Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia at term (37-41 weeks of gestation). 4. Single fetus pregnancy. 5. Provided written informed consent to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Emergency cesarean delivery. 2. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., coagulation disorders, infection at the injection site, patient refusal). 3. Known allergy to local anesthetics (ropivacaine, bupivacaine) or NSAIDs (ketoprofen). 4. Chronic pain syndrome or regular use of opioid analgesics prior to surgery. 5. BMI > 35 kg/m². 6. Multiple pregnancy (twins, triplets, etc.). 7. Pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. 8. Inability to communicate or understand the pain assessment scales (NRS). 9. Previous abdominal surgery with extensive adhesions that may alter anatomy for nerve blocks.
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternity Hospital - State Budgetary Institution of the Rostov Region, Taganrog | Taganrog, Rostov Oblast | Russia |