TrialReader


Recovery Legal Care Trial

NCT07764458 — Not applicable, Recruiting, 200 participants, University of Chicago

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Health Impact of the "Recovery Legal Care" Medical-Legal Partnership

RegistryNCT07764458, acronym HVIP-MLP
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, prevention
Enrollment200 (Estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Chicago (Other); collaborators: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
ConditionsFirearm Injury, Injury Traumatic, Economic Problems
InterventionsRecovery Legal Care, HVIP Standard of Care (Other)
Datesstart 2026-05-11, primary completion 2027-07-31 (estimated), completion 2027-07-31 (estimated), first posted 2026-08-14, last updated 2026-10-28
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Firearm Injury All trials for Injury Traumatic All trials of Recovery Legal Care All trials of HVIP Standard of Care

-Summary

Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Programs (HVIPs) affiliated with U.S. trauma centers often focus on individual behavior modification to reduce re-victimization. There is a lack of reproducible evidence that has demonstrated effectiveness, given the exclusion of addressing social and economic risks, often the root cause of violent injury and preventable homicide. This study tests a novel Medical-Legal Partnership that offers legal support to address social and economic risks, reduce perceived stress, and reduce firearm injury, while collaborating with the CFVP Coordinating Center for broad trauma center distribution and public health impact.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

National trauma center verification relies on a commitment to injury prevention efforts, including prevention of community-level violence. Hospital-Based Violence Recovery Programs (HVIPs) have expanded across the country as extensions of Level I and II trauma centers to address trauma recidivism with individual behavioral modification during the "teachable moment". There is no evidence to date that has demonstrated effectiveness in this approach for HVIPs, despite proliferation across the country. A criticism of this approach to violence prevention is the difficulty for community-based violence prevention specialists from HVIP programs to address the broader social and economic risk factors that lead to violence through individual behavior modification. Medical-Legal Partnerships (MLPs) have been one approach that has demonstrated evidence and success in improving health outcomes and reducing health-harming legal needs of patients by connecting legal experts to medical experts for holistic care. The MLP approach has yet to be done for trauma patients and has not been incorporated into any HVIP approach thus far. In the study's biphasic proposal, the UG3 aims are to clearly identify the types of health-harming legal needs of patients and families affected by firearm violence and examine the population-level differences in types of legal needs by sociodemographic and geographic factors. The investigators then aim to develop the HVIP-MLP model for implementation at an urban, Level I Trauma Center on the South Side of Chicago. The UH3 aims are to examine implementation outcomes (acceptability and feasibility) of this novel MLP compared to standard of care with HVIP; and examine health outcomes via a clinical trial measuring primary health outcome (perceived stress) and secondary outcomes (improvements in legal need self-efficacy, PTSD symptoms, and firearm aggression and victimization). Close coordination with the CFVP Coordinating Center will be essential for data handling, measurement, analytics support and consultation with future public/stakeholder engagement and dissemination to demonstrate public health impact. This novel HVIP-MLP approach has the potential to broadly impact the HVIP model to include an MLP component to all trauma centers for verification to support patients, families and providers alike in this important public health work.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
HVIP-MLPExperimentalOther: Recovery Legal CareThis arm includes patients receiving usual care and also support from Recovery Legal Care (HVIP+MLP).
HVIPActive comparatorOther: HVIP Standard of CareThis arm includes patients receiving usual care (HVIP only).
  • Recovery Legal Care (Other): These patients will receive support from our HVIP standard of care (Violence Recovery Program) plus our Medical Legal Partnership (Recovery Legal Care) for additional legal support to address health-harming legal needs and public benefits.
  • HVIP Standard of Care (Other): These patients will receive HVIP standard of care (Violence Recovery Program Support).

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Perceived Stress [Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months]: The Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) is a 10-item psychological questionnaire used to measure how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded a person feels over the last month. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher numbers meaning higher stress.

Secondary outcomes

  • Firearm victimization and aggression [Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months]: The adapted Conflict Tactics Scale 2 (CTS2) measures behaviors related to firearm victimization and aggression. The adapted version includes 3 items on non-partner victimization and 3 items on non-partner aggression, each rated on a 7-point frequency scale (never to 20+ times). Each domain generates a score from 0 to 18 with a higher score indicating higher victimization or aggression.
  • Legal needs self-efficacy [Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months]: Adapted Bandura Self-Efficacy Scale measures belief in one's ability to have legal needs addressed and is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating higher self-efficacy.

Other outcomes

  • Health-related quality of life [Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months]: The SF-12 (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey) is a brief, 12-question patient-reported tool used to measure physical and mental health-related quality of life. Derived from the longer SF-36 survey, it takes about two minutes to complete and evaluates eight core health domains. The SF-12 survey yields two primary summary scores-the Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS-12). Both scores use norm-based calculations scaled to a general population average (mean) of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, with higher scores indicating higher quality of life.
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms [Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months]: The PCL-5 (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5) is a 20-question self-test that tracks post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. You rate each question from 0 to 4. Add all numbers for a total score between 0 and 80, with higher scores indicating more severe PTSD symptoms.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 14 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Treatment for an interpersonal violent injury at the University of Chicago Trauma Center (e.g., gunshot, stab wound, assault)
* Ages 14+ years
* Able to provide informed consent (18 years and older) or assent (14-17 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Unable to provide informed consent due to mental status or severe mental illness
* Prior receipt of legal services at UCMC within the past year
* Currently imprisoned or incarcerated
* Residing at a non-Illinois address
* Non-English speakers

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Chicago Medical CenterChicago, IllinoisUnited StatesRecruiting

+Publications

  • Results publication: Tung EL, Pillai R, Sen-Gupta N, Nigro A, Cosey-Gay F, Stolbach BC, Rogers SO, Zakrison TL. Income Support Needs and Bedside Legal Assistance for Patients Recovering From Violent Injuries. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2538044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.38044. PMID 41100080

+Funding

NIH grants: 5UH3HD111325-03

My Notes