TrialReader


Efficacy of IPL, an Anti-redness Dermocosmetic, and Their Combination in the Treatment of Rosacea

NCT07729540 — Not applicable, Completed, 60 participants, Medical University of Silesia

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Intense Pulsed Light, a Targeted Anti-Redness Dermocosmetic Regimen, and Their Combination for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea: A Comparative Study Using Antera 3D Chromophore Mapping, Grey-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix Texture Analysis and Clinician Erythema Assessment Scale.

RegistryNCT07729540
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; non randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment60 (Actual)
SponsorMedical University of Silesia (Other); collaborators: Synchroline/Cantabria Labs
ConditionsRosacea
InterventionsIntense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca, Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen (Device, other)
Datesstart 2025-09-29, primary completion 2026-04-30, completion 2026-04-30, first posted 2026-07-27, last updated 2026-07-27
Locations1 site in Poland

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Rosacea All trials of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca All trials of Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen

-Summary

This study compares three approaches to treating persistent facial redness in adults with erythematotelangiectatic rosacea: intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment alone, a professional anti-redness dermocosmetic skincare regimen alone, and the combination of both. The main question the study aims to answer is which of these three strategies is more effective at reducing facial redness, using both clinician grading and objective skin-imaging tools that measure redness and skin texture before and after treatment.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This was a prospective, single-center, three-arm comparative study conducted in an outpatient setting, with 60 adult patients with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea allocated to one of three parallel treatment groups (20 patients per group). No randomization or blinding was performed.

Group 1 (IPL) received three intense pulsed light treatments with the Lumecca applicator (InMode; 515-1200 nm) at 21-day intervals, with fluence individually titrated to skin response; broad-spectrum SPF 50+ sunscreen was applied after each session, and daily photoprotection was mandatory.

Group 2 (dermocosmetic) received four professional in-office anti-redness treatments using the Rosacure Professional system (Synchroline/Cantabria Labs) at 7-day intervals - gentle cleansing, application of Rosacure Professional Serum Booster, and a leave-on regenerating gel mask - together with a standardized 12-week home-care regimen (twice-daily gentle cleanser, Rosacure Intensive SPF 30 in the morning, Rosacure Fast in the evening, and a leave-on mask twice weekly).

Group 3 (combination) received the same three IPL treatments as Group 1, immediately followed within the same session by the professional Rosacure protocol, at 21-day intervals, together with the same home-care regimen used in Group 2.

Facial redness was assessed using objective imaging (Antera 3D chromophore mapping and Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix texture analysis) and by clinician grading, at baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
IPL Monotherapy (Lumecca)ExperimentalDevice: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - LumeccaThree intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments using the Lumecca applicator (InMode; 515-1200 nm) at 21-day intervals. Fluence was individually titrated to skin response and increased across sessions. Broad-spectrum sunscreen SPF 50+ was applied after each session, and daily photoprotection was mandatory.
Dermocosmetic Regimen (Rosacure Professional)ExperimentalOther: Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimenFour professional in-office anti-redness treatments using the Rosacure Professional system (Synchroline/Cantabria Labs) at 7-day intervals: gentle cleansing, application of Rosacure Professional Serum Booster (4-t-butylcyclohexanol, niacin amide, panthenol, sodium hyaluronate, polyglutamic acid), and a leave-on regenerating gel mask. Concurrently, a standardized 12-week home-care regimen: twice-daily gentle cleanser, Rosacure Intensive SPF 30 each morning, Rosacure Fast each evening, and a leave-on mask twice weekly.
Combined IPL and Dermocosmetic TherapyExperimentalDevice: Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca; Other: Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimenThree IPL treatments identical to Arm 1 (Lumecca applicator, 515-1200 nm, 21-day intervals), immediately followed within the same session by the professional Rosacure protocol described in Arm 2, together with the same 12-week home-care regimen used in Arm 2.
  • Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) - Lumecca (Device): IPL treatment (515-1200 nm) delivered with the Lumecca applicator (InMode, Irvine, CA, USA), administered as three sessions at 21-day intervals with fluence individually titrated to skin response.
  • Rosacure anti-redness dermocosmetic regimen (Other): Professional in-office anti-redness regimen (Rosacure Professional system: gentle cleansing, Rosacure Professional Serum Booster, leave-on regenerating gel mask) plus a standardized 12-week home-care regimen (Rosacure Intensive SPF 30 mornings, Rosacure Fast evenings, leave-on mask twice weekly), manufactured by Synchroline/Cantabria Labs, Spain.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Antera 3D Erythema Index (Mean, Minimum, and Maximum) [Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series]: Erythema quantified via the Antera 3D camera (Miravex, Dublin, Ireland), which reconstructs hemoglobin distribution from multidirectional, multispectral light reflectance and expresses erythema on a reproducible relative scale. For each patient and time point, three erythema indices - mean, minimum, and maximum - were extracted for the left and right cheek and averaged into a single value per index.

Secondary outcomes

  • GLCM Contrast [Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series]: Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture parameter quantifying local brightness variation of the erythematous facial skin from cross-polarized photographs (8-bit grayscale, 256×256 co-occurrence matrix, horizontal offset θ=0°, distance d=1); higher values indicate a more irregular, mottled erythema. Left and right cheek values averaged per patient.
  • GLCM Homogeneity [Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series]: Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture parameter quantifying surface uniformity of the erythematous facial skin; higher values indicate more uniform erythema. Derived from the same cross-polarized photographs and co-occurrence matrix as GLCM contrast. Left and right cheek values averaged per patient.
  • Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) Score [Baseline, 2 weeks after the treatment series, and 8 weeks after the treatment series]: Semi-quantitative 5-point ordinal scale (0-4) graded by trained dermatologists, where 0 = no visible erythema and 4 = severe, intense redness; mean of scores from three independent raters.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 20 Years to 57 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult patients with a dermatologist-confirmed diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea

Exclusion Criteria:

* Age under 18 years
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Predisposition to keloid or hypertrophic scarring
* Use of systemic or topical retinoids, antibiotics, or hormonal therapy within the washout period specified for each agent
* Chemical peeling within one month
* Laser treatment or phototherapy within three months
* Photosensitizing medications or herbal preparations
* Inflammatory dermatoses other than rosacea
* Autoimmune disease
* Active skin infection in the treatment area

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Medical University of SilesiaSosnowiecPoland

+Publications

  • Ou X, Pan W, Xiao P. In vivo skin capacitive imaging analysis by using grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Int J Pharm. 2014 Jan 2;460(1-2):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 2. PMID 24188984
  • Crea F, Pupita G, Galassi AR, el Tamimi H, Kaski JC, Davies GJ, Maseri A. Effect of theophylline on exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia. Lancet. 1989 Apr 1;1(8640):683-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92204-6. PMID 2564505
  • Seo JK, Shin EJ, Jeong KH, Shin MK. Clinician Severity Assessment Grading Scale on Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea. Indian J Dermatol. 2021 Mar-Apr;66(2):203-205. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_611_19. No abstract available. PMID 34188282
  • Tan J, Liu H, Leyden JJ, Leoni MJ. Reliability of Clinician Erythema Assessment grading scale. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct;71(4):760-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.05.044. Epub 2014 Jul 4. PMID 24999270
  • Piccolo D, Fusco I, Zingoni T, Conforti C. Effective Treatment of Rosacea and Other Vascular Lesions Using Intense Pulsed Light System Emitting Vascular Chromophore-Specific Wavelengths: A Clinical and Dermoscopical Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 13;13(6):1646. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061646. PMID 38541871
  • Zhai Q, Cheng S, Liu R, Xie J, Han X, Yu Z. Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light and Pulsed-Dye Laser Therapy in the Management of Rosacea. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Dec;23(12):3821-3827. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16549. Epub 2024 Sep 6. PMID 39240125
  • Sulk M, Seeliger S, Aubert J, Schwab VD, Cevikbas F, Rivier M, Nowak P, Voegel JJ, Buddenkotte J, Steinhoff M. Distribution and expression of non-neuronal transient receptor potential (TRPV) ion channels in rosacea. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 Apr;132(4):1253-62. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.424. Epub 2011 Dec 22. PMID 22189789

+Investigators

My Notes