Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica

NCT07632612 — Not applicable, Recruiting, 80 participants, Ibadat International University, Islamabad

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Comparing the Effectiveness of Tensioner Vs Slider Neurodynamic Techniques in Patients With Sciatica: A Randomised Control Trial

RegistryNCT07632612
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment80 (Estimated)
SponsorIbadat International University, Islamabad (Other)
ConditionsSciatica, Sciatica Pain
InterventionsSlider Neurodynamic Technique Group, Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group (Other)
Datesstart 2026-06-03 (estimated), primary completion 2026-09-03 (estimated), completion 2026-09-10 (estimated), first posted 2026-06-08, last updated 2026-06-08
Locations1 site in Pakistan

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Sciatica All trials for Sciatica Pain All trials of Slider Neurodynamic Technique Group All trials of Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group

-Summary

objective of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of both tensioner and slider neurodynamic approaches in patients suffering from sciatica. This study seeks to establish which approach is more efficacious in alleviating pain intensity, disability functional, and mobility. The results of this study will assist physical therapists in making an informed decision on the type of neurodynamic therapy for their patients.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Due to the increasing prevalence of sciatica and evidence based treatment options using physiotherapy that offers effective alleviation of pain and rehabilitation of function. Neurodynamic mobilization focuses on addressing neurological problems; thus, there is a need to know about the effectiveness of the different types of the technique being used.

The current research is expected to contribute to the existing literature in the area of physiotherapy concerning the identification of the most effective neurodynamic technique in the case of sciatica. These findings could be helpful for medical practitioners during their work, making decisions and planning treatment. At the same time, the results of the investigation may become the basis for further research.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Slider Neurodynamic Technique GroupExperimentalOther: Slider Neurodynamic Technique GroupParticipants will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique GroupActive comparatorOther: Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique GroupParticipants will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
  • Slider Neurodynamic Technique Group (Other): will receive slider neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.
  • Tensioner Neurodynamic Technique Group (Other): will receive tensioner neurodynamic mobilization techniques along with conventional physiotherapy management.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Pain intensity [Baseline to Week 8]: will be measured using VAS
  • Functional disability [Baseline to week 8]: measured using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

Secondary outcomes

  • Hip range of motion [Baseline to week 8]: assessed using Goniometer
  • Lumbar flexion Range of Motion [Baseline to Week 8]: measured using Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST)

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 20 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients with radicular pain persisting for 12 weeks to 1 year, with no acute episode in the last 4 weeks
* Unilateral symptoms radiating below the buttock to thigh, knee, or lower leg
* Positive Slump Test
* Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test above 45°
* Functional limitation during activities such as walking or lifting

Exclusion Criteria:

* BMI < 20 kg/m² or > 30 kg/m²
* Previous history of spinal surgery
* Presence of red flags (significant motor/sensory loss, altered reflexes, or bowel/bladder dysfunction)
* Peripheral neuropathy
* History of vertebral fracture or significant spinal/limb trauma
* Systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular, or renal disease)
* Progressive neurological deficits (motor weakness, sensory loss, reflex changes)
* Pregnancy

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Ibadat International HospitalRawalpindi, Punjab ProvincePakistanRecruiting