A Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of Mepi™ Press 2 vs UrgoK2® for Compression Therapy in Venous Leg Ulcers

NCT07600489 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 386 participants, Molnlycke Health Care AB

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Comparative, Adaptive, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Clinical Investigation of Two-Layer Compression Bandages Mepi™ Press 2 Versus UrgoK2® in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

RegistryNCT07600489
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment386 (Estimated)
SponsorMolnlycke Health Care AB (Industry); collaborators: Euraxi Pharma
ConditionsVenous Leg Ulcer (VLU), Compression Bandages
InterventionsCompression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2), Compression bandage system (UrgoK2®), Wound Dressing Material (Device)
Datesstart 2026-05-01 (estimated), primary completion 2028-05-01 (estimated), completion 2028-05-01 (estimated), first posted 2026-05-20, last updated 2026-05-20
Locations8 sites in France

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU) All trials for Compression Bandages All trials of Compression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2) All trials of Compression bandage system (UrgoK2®)

-Summary

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) account for approximately 70% of all lower limb ulcers and affect an estimated 0.032% to 1% of the population in Western countries, corresponding to approximately 265,000 to 650,000 individuals in France. Effective management of VLUs is essential to reduce patient burden and associated healthcare costs. Compression therapy is the cornerstone of VLU treatment , as it improves venous return, reduces oedema, and promotes wound healing. Multilayer compression bandage systems, including two-layer systems, are considered the gold standard, and in France, they are recommended as first-line treatment for VLUs.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether the Mepi™ Press 2 compression system is non-inferior to UrgoK2® in the treatment of venous leg ulcers in adult patients.

The main question it aims to answer is:

-Is Mepi™ Press 2 non-inferior to UrgoK2® in terms of the proportion of completely healed VLUs within 12 weeks?

Researchers will compare Mepi™ Press 2 with UrgoK2® to determine whether similar clinical efficacy, performance, and safety can be achieved.

Participants are adult patients with venous leg ulcers of less than 24 months duration requiring treatment with a two-layer compression bandage system. The study is multicenter, involving approximately 25 sites in France, and plans to enroll 386 participants.

Participants will:

* Receive compression therapy with either Mepi™ Press 2 or UrgoK2® in accordance with standard of care
* Receive an appropriate primary wound dressing prior to compression
* Attend up to five study visits over a period of up to 12 weeks (or until wound healing, whichever occurs first)
* Be assessed for wound healing, safety, and device performance throughout the study

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Mepi™ Press 2- two-layer compression bandageExperimentalDevice: Compression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2); Device: Wound Dressing MaterialParticipants will receive compression therapy using Mepi™ Press 2 in accordance with standard of care for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management. Mepi™ Press 2 is a two-layer, short-stretch compression system consisting of a padded bandage and a cohesive compression bandage with visual application indicator. An appropriate primary wound dressing will be applied prior to compression. Bandages are worn continuously and changed as clinically indicated, typically up to once weekly. The system is intended to provide high working pressure and low resting pressure to support venous return and reduce edema. Single-use, non-sterile device.
UrgoK2® - multicomponent, compression systemActive comparatorDevice: Compression bandage system (UrgoK2®); Device: Wound Dressing MaterialParticipants will receive compression therapy using UrgoK2® in accordance with standard of care for venous leg ulcer (VLU) management. UrgoK2® is a two-layer compression system consisting of a white short-stretch bandage (K-TECH) and a pink/beige cohesive long-stretch bandage (Kpress) with visual indicators to support correct application and achieve therapeutic compression (approximately 40 mmHg). An appropriate primary wound dressing will be applied prior to compression. Bandages are worn continuously and changed as clinically indicated, typically up to once weekly. The system is non-sterile, intended for single use, available in different sizes based on ankle circumference.
  • Compression bandage system (Mepi™ Press 2) (Device): A two-layer compression system consisting of a padded bandage and a cohesive short-stretch bandage with visual indicator. Provides therapeutic compression to support venous leg ulcer management. Applied with an appropriate primary wound dressing and changed as clinically indicated.
  • Compression bandage system (UrgoK2®) (Device): A two-layer compression system composed of a short-stretch bandage and a cohesive long-stretch bandage designed to achieve therapeutic compression (\~40 mmHg). Used for venous leg ulcer management with an appropriate primary wound dressing.
  • Wound Dressing Material (Device): Appropriate primary wound dressing applied prior to compression therapy according to standard of care.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Percentage of patients with complete healing of their VLU [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: Healing assessment is performed by the site investigator through clinical examination of the wound at the investigational site, during each of the follow-up visits.

Secondary outcomes

  • Compare reduction of VLU wound area (absolute and relative). [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: Absolute and percentage VLU wound surface area reduction compared to baseline at all follow-up visits .
  • Compare proportions of participants reaching 40% wound area reduction at 4 weeks [From enrollment to the follow-up visit at 4 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days)]: Proportion of participants reaching ≥40% relative wound area reduction (RWAR) at 4 weeks
  • Compare time to complete wound healing [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1(Day 0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0+ 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: Time to wound healed in each cohort, for patients with healed wound at termination.
  • Compare quality-of-life during treatment and up to 12 weeks. [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0) , Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day) ,Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: Quality of Life assessed with Wound-QoL-17 tool at each visit and change compared to baseline.
  • Compare comfort and usability as rated by the participant [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: At each follow-up visit, participants will complete a usability questionnaire including Likert scale assessments.
  • Compare usability as rated by the healthcare professional. [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: At each visit, the treating investigator will complete a usability questionnaire including Likert scale assessments; at baseline, only a limited set of questions will be collected.
  • Compare device use including frequency of change [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks, Visit 0 (D0), Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days),Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: A summary and comparison of the compression use, including frequency of dressing/compression changes and primary dressing used, and type and size of compression used in relation to ankle size
  • Compare safety profiles of both bandages. [From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks,Visit 1 (D0 + 2 weeks ± 1 day), Visit 2 (D0 + 4 weeks ± 3 days), Visit 3 (D0 + 8 weeks ± 4 days), Visit 4 (D0 + 12 weeks ± 4 day)s]: A(D)E and SA(D)E and DD rates.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients ≥ 18 years.
* Stage C6 venous leg ulcer diagnosed less than 24 months ago.
* 2cm² ≤ VLU surface area ≤ 40cm².
* ABPI equal or higher than 0.8 and equal or lower than 1.3.
* Able to read, understand and speak French for their medical care.
* Agreeing to follow the procedures described in the CIP.
* Benefiting from a social insurance coverage.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Any contraindication to investigational or comparator medical devices mentioned in their respective IFUs.
* Planned endovenous treatment or surgical venous stripping / exeresis within 8 weeks before planned inclusion date, or before end of participation to the study.
* Treatment with chemotherapy or antineoplastic agent within the last 6 months.
* Active wound infection or wound infection treatment within the past 4 weeks before inclusion or current use of silver dressings.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
* Persons deprived from their liberty.
* Persons protected under guardianship or curatorship.
* Any person who, as per investigator's decision, is not suitable to participate in the investigation for any other reason.-

+Locations (8)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Clinique du Parc-MontpellierCastelnau-le-LezFrance
CHU Michallon GrenobleGrenobleFrance
Clinique du Parc LyonLyonFrance
Hopital Edouard Herriot_HCLLyonFrance
CHU NantesNantesFrance
Poitiers PolycliniquePoitiersFrance
CHU Toulouse/Hopital RangueilToulouseFrance
Clinique Pasteur-ToulouseToulouseFrance

+Investigators

  • Arne Böhling, Study director, Mölnlycke Health Care AB