Efficacy and Safety of the Soricle for Subjective Tinnitus Relief

NCT07548320 — Not applicable, Completed, 36 participants, Neurive Co.,Ltd.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Efficacy and Safety of the Soricle, a Class III Combination Device of Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Sound Stimulation, for Subjective Tinnitus Relief: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Exploratory Clinical Trial

RegistryNCT07548320
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment36 (Actual)
SponsorNeurive Co.,Ltd. (Industry)
ConditionsTinnitus, Subjective Tinnitus
InterventionsSham Device, tVNS Device, tVNS + Sound Stimulation Device (Device)
Datesstart 2025-03-10, primary completion 2025-09-08, completion 2025-09-08, first posted 2026-04-23, last updated 2026-04-23
Locations1 site in South Korea

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Tinnitus All trials for Subjective Tinnitus All trials of Sham Device All trials of tVNS Device

-Summary

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Soricle, a medical device combining transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and sound stimulation, in patients with subjective tinnitus.

Participants were randomly assigned to either the active treatment group or a sham control group in a double-blind manner. The device was used daily for 8 weeks.

The primary objective was to assess the improvement in tinnitus symptoms, and safety was evaluated throughout the study period.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This was a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled exploratory clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Soricle, a Class III medical device combining transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and sound stimulation, for the treatment of subjective tinnitus.

Participants diagnosed with subjective tinnitus were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the active treatment group or the sham control group. The investigational device was applied daily for 8 weeks.

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the improvement in tinnitus symptoms, and secondary objectives included additional efficacy assessments and safety evaluations. Safety was monitored throughout the study, including the assessment of adverse events.

The study was conducted in accordance with ICH-GCP guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Sham ComparatorSham comparatorDevice: Sham DeviceParticipants received a sham device identical in appearance to the active device but without delivering therapeutic stimulation.
tVNS StimulationExperimentalDevice: tVNS DeviceParticipants received transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) using the investigational device.
tVNS + Sound StimulationExperimentalDevice: tVNS + Sound Stimulation DeviceParticipants received combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and sound stimulation using the investigational device.
  • Sham Device (Device): A sham device identical in appearance to the active device but without delivering therapeutic stimulation.
  • tVNS Device (Device): A medical device delivering transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) via auricular stimulation.
  • tVNS + Sound Stimulation Device (Device): A medical device delivering combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and sound stimulation.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) Score [8 weeks]: The change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) score from baseline to 8 weeks was assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults aged 18 years or older
* Patients with subjective tinnitus
* Able to understand and provide informed consent
* Willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

* Objective tinnitus
* Severe hearing loss requiring immediate treatment
* History of neurological or psychiatric disorders that may affect study outcomes
* Use of other tinnitus treatments during the study period
* Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with study participation

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Korea University Guro HospitalSeoulSouth Korea

+Investigators

  • Jaegu Cho, Principal investigator, Korea University Guro Hospital