Pain Diary Use After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT07308730 — Not applicable, Recruiting, 142 participants, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Randomized Controlled Trial on the Use of Pain Diary in Assessing Early Postoperative Pain Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

RegistryNCT07308730, acronym PDP-LC
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, other
Enrollment142 (Estimated)
SponsorMuğla Sıtkı Koçman University (Other)
ConditionsCholelithiasis, Postoperative Pain
InterventionsPostoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2025-11-15, primary completion 2026-07-30 (estimated), completion 2027-01-30 (estimated), first posted 2025-12-30, last updated 2026-01-06
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Cholelithiasis All trials for Postoperative Pain All trials of Postoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

-Summary

This randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of using a pain diary in the assessment of early postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients will be randomly assigned to a pain diary group or a control group receiving routine pain assessment. Postoperative pain intensity will be measured at predefined time points using standardized pain assessment tools. The study seeks to improve patient participation in postoperative pain evaluation without introducing additional pharmacological interventions.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eligible patients are randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group using a block randomization method.

In the intervention group, postoperative pain assessment is performed using a patient-completed pain diary. The pain diary is developed based on the literature and expert opinions and is introduced to patients during the preoperative period. Patients are instructed on how to complete the pain diary, and pain intensity is recorded at rest and during movement at predefined postoperative time points.

In the control group, postoperative pain assessment is carried out using routine clinical practice with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pain assessments are performed at the same postoperative time points as in the intervention group.

Additional pain-related assessments are conducted in both groups during the postoperative period. To minimize contamination between groups, patients in the intervention and control groups are followed in separate hospital rooms. Due to the visible nature of the pain diary, blinding is not feasible in this study.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Pain Management Intervention GroupExperimentalBehavioral: Postoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic CholecystectomyParticipants in this group will follow the pain management protocol after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including recording postoperative pain in a pain diary.
Control GroupNo interventionParticipants in this group will receive standard care after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at scheduled times by nurses and researchers, and recorded accordingly
  • Postoperative Pain Management Protocol for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Behavioral): This pain management protocol is specifically tailored for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and combines both scheduled pharmacological analgesics and non-pharmacological pain control measures. Unlike other studies, it includes daily pain diary monitoring to objectively track patient-reported postoperative pain and recovery outcomes.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Postoperative Pain Intensity and Pain Diary vs. VAS Comparison [During the first 48 hours post-surgery (measurements at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, and 48 hours postoperatively)]: The primary outcome measure involves postoperative pain intensity recorded by patients in the intervention group using a daily pain diary, compared to routine clinical VAS measurements in the control group. Measurements will be taken at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, and 48 hours post-surgery. Additionally, short pain inventories at 24 and 48 hours and VAS-based satisfaction evaluation before discharge will be performed.

Secondary outcomes

  • Postoperative Pain Intensity [During the first 48 hours post-surgery (measurements at 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, and 48 hours postoperatively)]: Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using a 0-10 Likert scale (VAS). In the intervention group, patients will record their pain in a daily pain diary at scheduled times, while in the control group, routine clinical VAS measurements will be performed. Additionally, short pain inventories at 24 and 48 hours and VAS-based satisfaction evaluation before discharge will be conducted

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Admitted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
2. Scheduled for first-time laparoscopic cholecystectomy
3. Aged 18 years or older
4. Able to speak, read, and understand Turkish
5. Literate
6. Communicative and cooperative
7. ASA score of 1, 2, or 3
8. Expected to stay at least 24 hours in the hospital post-surgery
9. Capable of understanding study instructions
10. Willing to participate voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prolonged stay in the recovery unit due to extended effects of general anesthesia
2. Admission to intensive care unit postoperatively
3. Having chronic pain and receiving treatment for it
4. Being a cancer patient
5. Having a writing disability
6. Inability to communicate
7. Having cognitive, affective, verbal, visual, or auditory impairments
8. Diagnosed psychiatric disorders such as anxiety or depression and using related medications
9. Choosing to withdraw from the study after giving consent

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Menteşe State HospitalMuğla, MenteşeTurkey (Türkiye)Recruiting

+Investigators

  • Gülşah K KÖSE, Study director, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University / Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing