Morning Versus Evening Patching in Childhood Amblyopia

NCT07294599 — Not applicable, Completed, 84 participants, Yarmouk University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Morning Versus Evening Patching in Childhood Amblyopia-A Randomized Clinical Trial

RegistryNCT07294599
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment84 (Actual)
SponsorYarmouk University (Other)
ConditionsAmblyopia
Interventionseye-patching (Behavioral)
Datesstart 2025-12-14, primary completion 2026-08-01, completion 2026-08-01, first posted 2025-12-19, last updated 2026-08-04
Locations2 sites in Jordan

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Amblyopia All trials of eye-patching

-Summary

To determine whether the time of day at which daily occlusion therapy is administered-morning, with 2 hours of patching completed within 07:00-10:00, versus evening, with 2 hours completed within 17:00-20:00-affects visual-acuity improvement in the amblyopic eye in children with unilateral amblyopia.

Rationale:

While occlusion therapy remains the mainstay for treatment of childhood amblyopia, existing trials have focused on patching duration, not on the timing of occlusion. Diurnal or chronobiological factors - such as fluctuations in neuroplasticity, attention, compliance, or visual demand during the day - may influence the efficacy of patching. Understanding whether timing matters could help optimize occlusion therapy, improve outcomes, and reduce treatment burden.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Study Type: Prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial.

Participants: Children aged 4-8 years with unilateral amblyopia; amblyopic-eye BCVA between 0.17-0.67 decimal (≈ 6/36-6/9); fellow-eye BCVA ≥ 0.80 decimal; refractive-dominant or strabismic/mixed amblyopia. Parental/guardian consent required.

Randomization \& Stratification: Participants randomized 1:1 to "Morning patching" vs "Evening patching" arms. Stratified by age (4-<6 vs >=6-8), baseline visual acuity or amblyopia severity (moderate 6/36-<6/12 vs mild 6/12-6/9), and amblyopia type (refractive-dominant vs strabismic/mixed) - to ensure balance across key prognostic variables.

Intervention: Participants received daily occlusion of the fellow eye for 2 hours within the assigned treatment window: 07:00-10:00 for the morning group and 17:00-20:00 for the evening group. Near-vision activities, such as reading, puzzles, or coloring, were encouraged during patching but were not formally quantified. Caregivers recorded the start time, end time, and duration of each patching session in a daily diary. Missed weekday patching could be made up on weekends according to the study protocol. Spectacle correction, when prescribed, was maintained throughout the study.

Follow-up / Assessments:

Baseline exam (BCVA both eyes, refraction, ocular alignment/strabismus assessment, anterior and posterior segment exam, stereoacuity, instructions on patching/adherence, randomization).

Midpoint follow-up at 3 months (BCVA, adherence, adverse events. Telehealth acceptable if in-person not possible.).

Final follow-up at 6 months (BCVA (primary endpoint), stereoacuity, ocular alignment/strabismus assessment, anterior segment exam, adherence data review, adverse events, patching compliance summary.).

Primary Outcome: Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the amblyopic eye from baseline to month 6.

Secondary Outcomes: Stereoacuity, caregiver-reported patching adherence within the assigned treatment window, and the proportion of participants achieving at least a 0.20 logMAR improvement from baseline to Month 6.

Statistical Approach: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) comparing mean change in BCVA between arms, adjusting for baseline VA and stratification factors. Subgroup analyses by amblyopia type, baseline severity, age group.

Sample Size and Power: Assuming a clinically meaningful between-group difference of 0.12 logMAR, a common standard deviation of 0.18 logMAR, a two-sided alpha of 0.05, and 80% power, 37 evaluable participants per group were required. The target enrollment was increased to 42 participants per group, for a total of 84, to allow for attrition or unavailable Month-6 outcomes.

Duration \& Timeline:

Each participant will be followed for 6 months of daily patching. The total study duration (from first enrollment to last follow-up) will depend on recruitment rate; estimated duration \~ 7-9 months including recruitment, follow-up, data cleaning, and analysis.

Significance \& Expected Impact:

If timing of occlusion influences visual outcome, this could refine occlusion therapy recommendations - potentially improving efficacy, adherence, and convenience for patients and families. The trial may identify a more effective or practical patching schedule, thereby contributing to evidence-based amblyopia management.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Morning patchingExperimentalBehavioral: eye-patchingParticipants patched the fellow eye for 2 hours daily within the morning window of 07:00 to 10:00 for 6 months. During patching: child is encouraged to perform near-vision activities (e.g. reading, puzzles, coloring). Duration: 6 months (unless withdrawal criteria met).
Evening patchingExperimentalBehavioral: eye-patchingParticipants patched the fellow eye for 2 hours daily within the evening window of 17:00 to 20:00 for 6 months. During patching: same near-vision tasks as Arm 1. Duration: 6 months (unless withdrawal criteria met).
  • eye-patching (Behavioral), also known as occlusion therapy: is a non-invasive treatment for Amblyopia ("lazy eye") in children. It involves covering (patching) the stronger, "good" eye so that the weaker (amblyopic) eye is forced to work. This encourages the brain to rely on the amblyopic eye, helping to strengthen its visual pathways.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the amblyopic eye [Baseline to Month 6]: Change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the amblyopic eye from baseline to month 6, measured using a standardized logMAR (crowded) chart under full refractive correction, by a masked examiner.

Secondary outcomes

  • Adherence percentage reported by caregiver [Baseline through 6 months]: For each participant, adherence was calculated as the cumulative patching time recorded within the assigned morning or evening treatment window divided by the cumulative prescribed patching time over the 6-month treatment period, expressed as a percentage. Higher percentages indicate greater adherence.
  • Change From Baseline in Stereoacuity at Month 6 [Baseline through month 6]: Stereoacuity was assesed using the titmus fly test and recorded in seconds of arc
  • At least 2-line improvement [Baseline and Month 6]: Participants with a reduction of at least 0.20 logMAR from baseline to Month 6 were classified as achieving at least a 2-line improvement.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 4 Years to 8 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age: 4-8 years.
* Unilateral amblyopia.
* Amblyopic-eye BCVA decimal 0.17-0.67 (≈ 6/36-6/9).
* Fellow-eye BCVA ≥ 0.80 decimal (≈ 6/7.5 or better).
* Amblyopia type: refractive-dominant or strabismic/mixed.
* Parent/guardian consent obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Bilateral amblyopia.
* Sensory-deprivation amblyopia (e.g., due to congenital cataract, ptosis, corneal opacity).
* Ocular surgery within the past 6 months, or planned surgery during study.
* Likely poor adherence (e.g., due to social, logistic, or family constraints).

+Locations (2)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Irbid Medical Consultation CenterIrbid, Irbid GovernorateJordan
Princess Basma teaching hospitalIrbid, Irbid GovernorateJordan