Optimal Patient Positioning for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:

NCT07018258 — Not applicable, Completed, 120 participants, Harran University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Optimal Patient Positioning for Erector Spinae Plane Block: Effects on Postoperative Analgesia and Patient Satisfaction"

RegistryNCT07018258, acronym ESP-POSTURE
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment120 (Actual)
SponsorHarran University (Other)
ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Anesthesia, Regional, Pain Management
InterventionsErector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block (Procedure)
Datesstart 2025-06-27, primary completion 2025-11-10, completion 2025-12-10, first posted 2025-06-12, last updated 2026-02-27
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Postoperative Pain All trials for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy All trials of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block

-Summary

This randomized clinical study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy, analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction of erector spinae plane (ESP) block administered in three different patient positions-lateral, prone, and sitting-in individuals undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study also evaluates the variation in skin-to-block site distance depending on patient positioning.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively recent regional anesthesia technique performed under ultrasound guidance, widely used for managing acute postoperative pain. While the ESP block is known for its safety, simplicity, and versatility, there is limited evidence regarding the influence of patient positioning on its clinical effectiveness and technical performance.

This prospective, randomized, single-blind study investigates the impact of administering bilateral ESP block at the T7 vertebral level in three different patient positions: lateral decubitus, prone, and sitting. The study includes adult patients (aged 18-65, ASA I-II) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

Primary outcomes include postoperative pain scores (VAS and NRS). Secondary outcomes include total rescue analgesic consumption (tramadol), time to first analgesic requirement, patient satisfaction scores (Likert scale), and measurement of the skin-to-block site distance across different positions. Data will be collected at defined intervals up to 24 hours postoperatively.

The findings are expected to inform clinicians on the optimal patient positioning for ESP block to enhance block efficacy and patient comfort during laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Lateral Position GroupExperimentalProcedure: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) BlockPatients in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Prone Position GroupExperimentalProcedure: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) BlockPatients in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sitting Position GroupExperimentalProcedure: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) BlockPatients in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block (Procedure), also known as Ultrasound-guided ESP block: Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block performed at the T7 vertebral level. The intervention will be applied in three different patient positions-lateral, prone, or sitting-prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Postoperative Pain Score (VAS) [0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively]: Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) at multiple time points following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The goal is to compare postoperative pain scores between patient groups receiving ESP block in lateral, prone, or sitting positions.

Secondary outcomes

  • Total Postoperative Analgesic Consumption [First 24 hours after surgery]: The cumulative dose (mg) of tramadol administered as rescue analgesia within the first 24 hours postoperatively will be recorded for each group.
  • Time to First Analgesic Request [Within 24 hours postoperatively]: The duration (in minutes) between the end of surgery and the patient's first request for additional analgesia.
  • Patient Satisfaction Score [24 hours postoperatively]: Patient satisfaction will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).
  • Skin-to-Target Distance [During preoperative ESP block procedure]: The distance (in millimeters) from the skin to the ESP block site will be measured via ultrasound at the T7 level in each patient position to determine anatomical variation.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
* ASA physical status I-II
* Ability to understand and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Allergy to local anesthetics
* History of chronic opioid use or substance abuse
* Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy
* Local infection at the block site
* Severe spinal deformities or scoliosis
* BMI > 35 kg/m²
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Refusal to participate in the study

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Veli Fahri PehlivanSanliurfaTurkey (Türkiye)

+Investigators