Impact of a Telemonitoring Device on the Occurever at Home in Children at Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia

NCT06697262 — Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, 30 participants, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Impact of a Telemonitoring Device on the Occurrence of Fever at Home in Children at Risk of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

RegistryNCT06697262, acronym TELEDOM
StatusNot yet recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, prevention
Enrollment30 (Estimated)
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion (Other)
ConditionsOncopediatrics, Febrile Neutropenia
InterventionsRemote temperature monitoring device, Home temperature monitoring by a nurse (Device, diagnostic test)
Datesstart 2026-05-01 (estimated), primary completion 2028-05-04 (estimated), completion 2028-05-04 (estimated), first posted 2024-11-20, last updated 2026-01-20

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Oncopediatrics All trials for Febrile Neutropenia All trials of Remote temperature monitoring device All trials of Home temperature monitoring by a nurse

-Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility of the study, measured by the acceptability rate of patients to be recruited in a study proposing temperature monitoring at home, by a remote monitoring device or by the visit of an IDE at home (in association with the usual educational sessions), to children at risk of febrile neutropenia, from families with psycho-social vulnerabilities.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Will participants adhere to the telemonitoring system?
* Is the intervention feasible, in terms of the device's failure to record temperature data?
* Will parents behave appropriately when using the device?
* How satisfied will parents and caregivers be?
* What will be the physical tolerance of the device?
* On an exploratory basis, will the remote monitoring system be effective for months?

Researchers will compare :

* patients using the telemonitoring device for continuous temperature monitoring at home, in combination with education sessions on temperature monitoring and the device
* with patient with temperature monitoring at home by a nurse, 2 times a day, in combination with education sessions on temperature monitoring (without the telemonitoring device at home)

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
remote temperature monitoring deviceExperimentalDevice: Remote temperature monitoring device
home temperature monitoring by a nurseActive comparatorDiagnostic Test: Home temperature monitoring by a nurse
  • Remote temperature monitoring device (Device): * Use of the Tucky® remote monitoring device for continuous temperature monitoring at home, * In combination with education sessions on temperature monitoring and the device.
  • Home temperature monitoring by a nurse (Diagnostic test): * Home temperature monitoring by a nyrse, twice a day, * In association with education sessions on temperature monitoring.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • study acceptability rate [24 months]: number of patients included/number of eligible patients offered the study.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 0 Years to 17 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

patient

* Aged 0 to 17 inclusive
* Followed in the Pediatric Onco-Hematology Department
* Primo-diagnosed with solid or hematological cancer (incident case)
* Having received a first cycle of chemotherapy
* Whose family has psycho-social vulnerabilities assessed by the Froger et al. tool, indicating a need for an IDE to support the family in monitoring the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient:

* with a dermatosis contraindicating the use of the device
* Refusing to participate in the study