Predicting Mortality in Adults Hospitalized With Multiple Trauma: Can the BIG Score Estimate Risk?
| Registry | NCT06574464, acronym BIGstd |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | Observational |
| Enrollment | 563 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Haseki Training and Research Hospital (Other) |
| Conditions | Multiple Trauma, Injury Traumatic |
| Interventions | BIG SCORE, Glasgow coma scale, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score (Other) |
| Dates | start 2022-01-01, primary completion 2023-12-01, completion 2024-01-01, first posted 2024-08-28, last updated 2024-08-28 |
| Locations | 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye) |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Multiple Trauma All trials for Injury Traumatic All trials of BIG SCORE All trials of Glasgow coma scale
This study investigated the efficacy and reliability of the BIG score, calculated based on the base deficit (BD), International Normalized Ratio (INR), and Glasgow coma scale (GCS), in comparison with the GCS, Revised trauma score (RTS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) for predicting in-hospital mortality in adults with multiple-trauma presenting to the emergency department (ED).
This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 563 consecutive adults (≥ 18 years old) with multiple trauma who were admitted to our emergency department and hospitalized between January 2022 and December 2023. We assessed patient demographics (age and sex), vital signs on admission (systolic blood pressure \[SBP, mmHg\], heart rate \[HR, beats/min\], respiratory rate \[RR, breaths/min\], and peripheral oxygen saturation \[SpO2, %\]), complaints and symptoms on admission, anatomic region of injury, type of trauma (blunt or penetrating), mechanism of injury, BD measured in blood gases, INR, trauma scoring systems (e.g., GCS, RTS, ISS, and BIG score), and clinical outcomes (discharge, hospitalization, or death). The study cohort was divided into survivors and non-survivors. Survivors were defined as patients who were still alive after 28 days, while non-survivors had passed away within that time. The demographics, clinical characteristics, and trauma scoring systems were compared between survivors and non-survivors to determine the prognosis of patients with multiple trauma. Independent predictors of mortality were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis of variables (demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and trauma scores) that differed significantly between survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to establish cut-off values for the GCS, RTS, ISS, and BIG score, and then to assess the sensitivity and specificity of these scoring systems in terms of predicting in-hospital mortality.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Survivors | Other: BIG SCORE; Other: Glasgow coma scale; Other: Revised Trauma Score; Other: Injury Severity Score | Survivors were defined as patients who were still alive after 28 days of admission to the emergency department. | |
| Non-survivors | Other: BIG SCORE; Other: Glasgow coma scale; Other: Revised Trauma Score; Other: Injury Severity Score | Non-survivors had passed away within 28 days of admission to the emergency department |
Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any
Inclusion Criteria: * This study included 563 consecutive adults (≥ 18 years old) with multiple trauma who were admitted to our Emergency Department and hospitalized between January 2022 and December 2023. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients aged < 18 years and adults who were discharged from the Emergency Department * Patients with non-traumatic injuries and those who presented to the Emergency Department for reasons other than trauma * Patients with missing Base Deficit and International Normalized Ratio levels * Patients who had been admitted to the hospital more than 24 hours after the trauma * Patients with single trauma (e.g., isolated extremity trauma, isolated head injury, etc.) * Patients with chronic conditions such as chronic renal failure or hepatic, hematological, or neurological diseases
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haseki Training and Research Hospital | Istanbul, Fatih | Turkey (Türkiye) |