Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse Detection Using Long-term Ambulatory Rhythm - A Pilot Study
| Registry | NCT06378996, acronym ALARM-PILOT |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; na, single group, masking: none, diagnostic |
| Enrollment | 60 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven (Other) |
| Conditions | Mitral Valve Prolapse, Ventricular Arrythmia |
| Interventions | 14-day rhythm monitoring (Diagnostic test) |
| Dates | start 2024-05-01, primary completion 2026-06-15, completion 2026-06-15, first posted 2024-04-23, last updated 2026-07-21 |
| Locations | 1 site in Belgium |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Mitral Valve Prolapse All trials for Ventricular Arrythmia All trials of 14-day rhythm monitoring
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) affects up to 3% of the general population and a small subset of patients is at risk for ventricular arrhythmias. This subgroup is referred to as AMVP (arrhythmic MVP) and was recently defined using the following criteria: (1) Presence of MVP), (2) Ventricular arrhythmia that is either frequent (≥5% total premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden on Holter) or complex (non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT), ventricular tachycardia (VT), or ventricular fibrillation (VF)), and (3) The absence of any other well-defined arrhythmic substrate.
Currently, diagnosis is often based on repeated 24-hour Holter monitoring. However, the ventricular arrhythmia burden varies from day-to-day and long-term rhythm monitoring has shown in other pathologies to increase the diagnostic yield with up to 200% (from 22.5% on 24h to 75.3% on 14 days).
This pilot study aims to study the diagnostic yield of long-term rhythm monitoring in patients with MVP as well as the day-to-day variability of ventricular arrhythmias to facilitate power calculation for a future large-scale prospective registry.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 day monitoring | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 14-day rhythm monitoring |
Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 years or older * Mitral valve prolapse diagnosed on previous echocardiography or cardiac MRI * New York Heart association classification ≥3 for cohort 3 and classification 1 or 2 for cohorts 1 and 2 * Willing and able to provide signed written informed consent * No contra-indication for long-term monitoring (known allergy to adhesives) Exclusion Criteria: * Prior cardiac surgery, including previous mitral valve intervention * Prior endovascular mitral valve repair (MitraClip) * Previous catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias * Patients not in sinus rhythm * Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs but betablockers * Known alternative arrhythmic substrate, for example previous myocardial infarction * Known allergy to adhesives
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| UZ Leuven | Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant | Belgium |