Standardised Drug Provocation Testing in Perioperative Hypersensitivity

NCT06065137 — Not applicable, Completed, 50 participants, University Hospital, Antwerp

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT06065137
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; na, single group, masking: none, diagnostic
Enrollment50 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity Hospital, Antwerp (Other)
ConditionsAllergic Reaction, Hypersensitivity, Perioperative Complication, Anaphylaxis, Anaphylactic Reaction, Immediate Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity, Drug
InterventionsFull dose DPT with propofol, Full dose DPT with ketamine, Full dose DPT with etomidate, Full dose DPT with midazolam, Full dose DPT with fentanyl, Full dose DPT with sufentanyl, Full dose DPT with alfentanil, Full dose DPT with remifentanil, Full dose DPT with rocuronium, Full dose DPT with atracurium, Full dose DPT with cisatracurium, Full dose DPT with succinylcholine (Diagnostic test)
Datesstart 2023-10-23, primary completion 2025-06-30, completion 2025-06-30, first posted 2023-10-03, last updated 2025-09-08
Locations1 site in Belgium

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Allergic Reaction All trials for Hypersensitivity All trials of Full dose DPT with propofol All trials of Full dose DPT with ketamine

-Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and outcome of systematic drug provocation testing with anaesthetics at therapeutic doses in adult patients undergoing diagnostic work-up for perioperative hypersensitivity.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Perioperative hypersensitivity reactions (POH) pose a risk for major morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. After resolution of the initial reaction it is crucial to determine the culprit drug to allow safe anaesthetics for future procedures.However this is not easy, as many drugs are administered near simultaneously and both anaesthesia and surgery may provoke or mask many of the symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction. Conventional testing seems to offer good predictive value based on the low incidence of POH in subsequent re-exposures after negative work-up. Despite negative work-up anaesthetists often chose not to re-administer an neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) used in the index reaction, especially if no other culprit was found. This introduces an important bias as this group (no culprit found, NMBA not re-exposed) might be at the highest risk of containing false negatives as NMBA are the most frequent cause of POH in our region.The same remark can be made regarding earlier attempts by our group and others at establishing the negative predictive value (NPV) of conventional testing through retrospective analysis of subsequent re-exposures.To truly establish the NPV for conventional testing and thus the need for DPT, a prospective approach is needed where all patients are challenged with index drugs after negative conventional testing.

Adult patients that are referred for diagnostic work-up for POH will be included if they have a clinical history fitting with POH.

All patients will first receive a full diagnostic work-up for all index products consisting of in vivo (skin tests) and in vitro (specific IgE and -for drugs in which it is available- basophil activation tests). Clinical reactions (both index reactions and any reactions during DPT) will be classified according to the National Audit Program (NAP-6) classification which separates non-fatal POH in 4 grades:

* NAP 1 (only cutaneous/mucosal signs)
* NAP 2 (circulatory or respiratory symptoms which don't require treatment)
* NAP 3 (circulatory or respiratory symptoms which require treatment or potential airway compromise)
* NAP 4 (fulfilling indications for cardiopulmonary resuscitation)

Skin tests will be performed at the allergology day clinic following the protocols of the French Society for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and the French Society of Allergology. Based on these results we make a distinction between patients with an identified culprit and those without an identified culprit.

If a culprit has been found, all other index drugs are challenged at therapeutic doses. The standard testing is performed for alternatives for the culprit drug in the same drug class (such as NMBA) and one drug from this class that tests negative is also used in a challenge at a therapeutic dose.

If no culprit has been found after the initial work-up of skin tests and in vitro tests the next step is determined by the severity of the initial reaction. In NAP-6 grade 1-3 reactions all index drugs are challenged at therapeutic doses. As the benefits of DPT have yet to be fully quantified the risk-benefit analysis in the most severe reactions (NAP 4) is difficult to make. Hence, we use an 'confirmation by elimination' principle in these cases in which we only challenge with the drugs that do not carry the highest likelihood of being the culprit. This likelihood is based on both timing and epidemiology as NMBA are a much more common cause of POH in our region than all other anaesthetics combined. By eliminating all other drugs we 'clear' them for future use and gain confidence in our suspicion of the most likely culprit without having to administer them in this population.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
POH patientsExperimentalDiagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with propofol; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with ketamine; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with etomidate; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with midazolam; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with fentanyl; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with sufentanyl; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with alfentanil; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with remifentanil; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with rocuronium; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with atracurium; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with cisatracurium; Diagnostic Test: Full dose DPT with succinylcholineincremental administration of investigated anesthetics up to full therapeutic dose in POH patients.
  • Full dose DPT with propofol (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of propofol up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (2mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for propofol. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.02mg/kg-0.2 mg/kg -0.6 mg/kg -1.2mg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with ketamine (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of ketamine up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (1mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for ketamine. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.01 mg/kg -0.1 mg/kg -0.3 mg/kg -0.6mg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with etomidate (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of etomidate up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.2mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for etomidate. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.002 mg/kg -0.02 mg/kg -0.06 mg/kg -1.2mg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with midazolam (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of midazolam up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.05mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for midazolam. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.0005 mg/kg -0.005 mg/kg -0.015 mg/kg -0.03mg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with fentanyl (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of fentanyl up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (1mcg/kg) in POH patients investigated for fentanyl. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.01 mcg/kg -0.1 mcg/kg -0.3 mcg/kg -0.6mcg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with sufentanyl (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of sufentanyl up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.1mcg/kg) in POH patients investigated for sufentanyl. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.001 mcg/kg -0.01 mcg/kg -0.03 mcg/kg -0.06µg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with alfentanil (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of alfentanil up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (10mcg/kg) in POH patients investigated for alfentanil. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.1 mcg/kg -1 mcg/kg -3 mcg/kg -6µg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with remifentanil (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of remifentanil up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.5mcg/kg) in POH patients investigated for remifentanil. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose, 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 6/10th of the dose (0.005 mcg/kg -0.05 mcg/kg -0.15 mcg/kg -0.3µg/kg).
  • Full dose DPT with rocuronium (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of rocuronium up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.6mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for rocuronium. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose (0.006 mg/kg -0.06 mg/kg ). In a second session 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 7/10th of the dose (0.18 mg/kg -0.42mg/kg) are administerd under general anesthesia.
  • Full dose DPT with atracurium (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of atracurium up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.5mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for atracurium. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose (0.005 mg/kg -0.05 mg/kg ). In a second session 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 7/10th of the dose (0.15 mg/kg -0.35mg/kg) are administered under general anesthesia .
  • Full dose DPT with cisatracurium (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of cisatracurium up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (0.15mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for cisatracurium. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose (0.0015 mg/kg -0.015 mg/kg ). In a second session 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 7/10th of the dose (0.045 mg/kg -0.105mg/kg) are administered under general anesthesia .
  • Full dose DPT with succinylcholine (Diagnostic test): Incremental administration of succinylcholine up to a cummulative full therapeutic dose (1mg/kg) in POH patients investigated for succinylcholine. Doses will be administered every 15 minutes starting at 1/100th of the dose, followed by 1/10th of the dose (0.01 mg/kg -0.1 mg/kg). In a second session 3/10th of the dose and ultimately 7/10th of the dose (0.3 mg/kg -0.7mg/kg) are administered under general anesthesia.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Hypersensitivity during DPT [1 hour]: Prevalence of hypersensitivity during direct provocation for drugs that tested negatively in conventional tests.

Secondary outcomes

  • Severe reactions during DPT [1 hour]: Prevalence of severe (NAP 3-4) hypersensitivity reactions during direct provocation testing
  • Adverse events during DPT [1 hour]: Prevalence of adverse events during or after direct provocation testing
  • Sensitivity of conventional tests [1 hour]: Sensitivity of skin tests, specific IgE and basophil activation tests for anaesthetics

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* patients consulting the allergology department of the Antwerp University hospital medical with a history consistent with perioperative hypersensitivity
* Indication for diagnostic work-up as determined at an interdisciplinary meeting between allergologists and anaesthetists
* willing to sign separate informed consent forms for both general anaesthesia and the Drug Provocation Test.

Exclusion Criteria:

* patient refusal
* incomplete diagnostic work-up
* history inconsistent with perioperative hypersensitivity

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Antwerp University HospitalEdegem, AntwerpBelgium

+Investigators

  • Vera Saldien, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital Antwerp, Head of department of anesthesiology