10°C vs 4°C Lung Preservation RCT

NCT05898776 — Not applicable, Active not recruiting, 317 participants, University Health Network, Toronto

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Safety of 10°C Lung Preservation vs. Standard of Care: A Multi-Centre Prospective Non-Inferiority Trial

RegistryNCT05898776
StatusActive not recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: double, treatment
Enrollment317 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity Health Network, Toronto (Other); collaborators: Medical University of Vienna, Vanderbilt University, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Mayo Clinic, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Corewell Health West, University of Miami, University Hospital of Leuven Leuven, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), University Hospital, Zürich, Dignity Health, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France
ConditionsLung Transplant, Organ Preservation
InterventionsLung transplantation after 10°C donor lung preservation, Lung transplantation after standard ice cooler donor lung preservation (Device)
Datesstart 2023-06-09, primary completion 2025-11-24, completion 2026-11-22 (estimated), first posted 2023-06-12, last updated 2026-03-19
Locations17 sites in United States, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Spain, Switzerland

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Lung Transplant All trials for Organ Preservation All trials of Lung transplantation after 10°C donor lung preservation All trials of Lung transplantation after standard ice cooler donor lung preservation

-Summary

Despite lung transplantation (LTx) being the most effective treatment for end-stage lung disease, its success rate is lower than that of other solid organ transplantations. Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the most common post-operative complication and a major factor in early mortality and morbidity, affecting \~25% of lung transplant patients. Induced by ischemia reperfusion, PGD represents a severe and acute lung injury that occurs within the first 72 hours after transplantation, and has a significant impact on short- and long-term outcomes, and a significant increase in treatment costs. Any intervention that reduces the risk of PGD will lead to major improvements in short- and long-term transplant outcomes and health care systems.

One of the main strategies to reduce the risk and severity of post-transplant PGD is to improve pre-transplant donor lung preservation methods. In current practice, lung preservation is typically performed by cold flushing the organ with a specialized preservation solution, followed by subsequent hypothermic storage on ice (\~4°C). This method continues to be used and applied across different organ systems due to its simplicity and low cost. Using this method for the preservation of donor lungs, the current maximum accepted preservation times have been limited to approximately 6-8h. While the goal of hypothermic storage is to sustain cellular viability during ischemic time through reduced cellular metabolism, lower organ temperature has also been shown to progressively favor mitochondrial dysfunction. Therefore, the ideal temperature for donor organ preservation remains to be defined and should maintain a balance between avoidance of mitochondrial dysfunction and prevention of cellular exhaustion. In addition to that, safe and longer preservation times can lead to multiple advantages such as moving overnight transplants to daytime, more flexibility to transplant logistics, more time for proper donor to recipient matching etc.

Building on pre-clinical research suggesting that 10°C may be the optimal lung storage temperature, a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted at University Health Network, Medical University of Vienna and Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital. Donor lungs meeting criteria for direct transplantation and with cross clamp times between 6:00pm - 4:00am were intentionally delayed to an earliest allowed start time of 6:00am and a maximum preservation time from donor cold flush to recipient anesthesia start time of 12 hours. Lungs were retrieved and transported in the usual fashion using a cooler with ice and transferred to a 10°C temperature-controlled cooler upon arrival to transplant hospital until implantation. The primary outcome of this study was incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Grade 3 at 72h, with secondary endpoints including: recipient time on the ventilator, ICU Length of Stay (LOS), hospital LOS, 30-day survival and lung function at 1-year. Outcomes were compared to a contemporaneous conventionally transplanted recipient cohort using propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio. 70 patients were included in the study arm. Post-transplant outcomes were comparable between the two groups for up to 1 year. Thus, intentional prolongation of donor lung preservation at 10°C was shown to be clinically safe and feasible.

In the current study design, the investigators will conduct a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial of 300 participants to compare donor lung preservation from the time of explant to implant at \~10°C in X°Port Lung Transport Device (Traferox Technologies Inc.) vs a standard ice cooler. When eligible donor lungs become available for a consented recipient, the lungs will be randomized to undergo a preservation protocol using either 10°C (X°Port Lung Transport Device, Traferox Technologies Inc.) or standard of care. The primary outcome of the study is incidence of ISHLT Primary Graft Dysfunction Grade 3 at 72 hours. Post-transplant outcomes will be followed for one year.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
10°C lung preservationExperimentalDevice: Lung transplantation after 10°C donor lung preservation
Standard lung preservationActive comparatorDevice: Lung transplantation after standard ice cooler donor lung preservation
  • Lung transplantation after 10°C donor lung preservation (Device): When suitable donor lungs become available for a, eligible, consented recipient and meet criteria to go straight to transplantation, the lungs randomized to 10°C preservation will be stored, transported and preserved in the X°Port Lung Transport Device (Traferox Technologies Inc.) until implant with a maximum time of 12 hours between the donor and recipient surgeries.
  • Lung transplantation after standard ice cooler donor lung preservation (Device): When suitable donor lungs become available for a, eligible, consented recipient and meet criteria to go straight to transplantation, the lungs randomized to standard preservation will be will be stored, transported and preserved in an ice cooler (\~4°C, standard of care) until implant with a maximum time of 6 hours between the donor and recipient surgeries.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) Grade 3 as per International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) [72 hours post-transplant]: PGD is graded on a scale of 0 to 3 based on ISHLT guidelines, where PGD Grade 3 indicates severe primary graft dysfunction.

Secondary outcomes

  • Incidence of Primary Graft Dysfunction Grade 2-3 as per International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [0 (ICU arrival), 24, 48, and 72 hours post-transplant]: PGD is graded on a scale of 0 to 3 based on ISHLT guidelines, where PGD Grade 3 indicates severe primary graft dysfunction.
  • Time on ventilator [Index hospitalization (up to 1 year)]
  • Total ICU and hospital length of stay [Index hospitalization (up to 1 year)]
  • Overall survival [30 days, 1 year post-transplant]
  • Occurrence of acute rejection [1 year post-transplant]
  • Six minute walk test [1 year post-transplant]
  • Forced expiratory volume - one second (FEV1 in L) [1 year post-transplant]

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Donor Inclusion Criteria

* Donation after brain death (DBD) or donation after cardiac death (DCD)
* Donor lungs are suitable to go straight to LTx (i.e., do not need ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) assessment)

Donor Exclusion Criteria

* Concerns with organ preservation technique
* Need for EVLP assessment

Recipient Inclusion Criteria

* 18-80 years old
* Primary lung transplantation
* Bilateral lung transplantation

Recipient Exclusion Criteria

* Re-transplantation
* Multi-organ transplantation
* Single lung transplantation
* Participation in a contraindicating trial

+Locations (17)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Dignity Health (St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center)Phoenix, ArizonaUnited States
University of California San FranciscoSan Francisco, CaliforniaUnited States
University of MiamiCoral Gables, FloridaUnited States
Corewell Health Research InstituteGrand Rapids, MichiganUnited States
Mayo ClinicRochester, MinnesotaUnited States
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterNashville, TennesseeUnited States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallas, TexasUnited States
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney LimitedSydney, New South WalesAustralia
Medical University of ViennaViennaAustria
University Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
University Health Network (Toronto General Hospital)Toronto, OntarioCanada
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalMontreal, QuebecCanada
The Saint Joseph Hospital Foundation (Hôpital Marie Lannelongue)ParisFrance
Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadridSpain
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-MajadahondaMadridSpain
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)LausanneSwitzerland
University Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland

+Investigators