SGLT2i and KNO3 in HFpEF - The SAK HFpEF Trial

NCT05138575 — Phase 2, Recruiting, 53 participants, University of Pennsylvania

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT05138575, acronym SAK
StatusRecruiting
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, crossover, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment53 (Estimated)
SponsorUniversity of Pennsylvania (Other)
ConditionsHeart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
InterventionsEmpagliflozin + Potassium Chloride, Empagliflozin + Potassium Nitrate, Potassium Chloride + Placebo for Empagliflozin (Drug)
Datesstart 2022-01-24, primary completion 2027-05-31 (estimated), completion 2027-05-31 (estimated), first posted 2021-12-01, last updated 2026-04-16
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction All trials of Empagliflozin + Potassium Chloride All trials of Empagliflozin + Potassium Nitrate

-Summary

This study will test whether pharmacologic agents that may improve mitochondrial function and energy fuel metabolism \[Empagliflozin (Empa)\], with and without additional supplements that increase perfusion and fatty acid oxidation \[Potassium Nitrate (KNO3)\], improve submaximal exercise endurance and skeletal muscle oxidative phosphorylation capacity (SkM OxPhos) in participants with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

This study will test whether Empagliflozin (Empa), with and without Potassium Nitrate (KNO3), improves submaximal exercise endurance, skeletal muscle oxidative phosphorylation capacity (SkM OxPhos), intramuscular perfusion, and changes in the skeletal muscle metabolome, proteome, and respiration in participants with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Empagliflozin + Potassium Chloride (KCl)Active comparatorDrug: Empagliflozin + Potassium ChlorideEmpagliflozin (10 mg daily) + Potassium Chloride (6 mmol three times daily) Active arm will be 6 weeks in duration followed by a 2 week washout period.
Empagliflozin + Potassium Nitrate (KNO3)Active comparatorDrug: Empagliflozin + Potassium NitrateEmpagliflozin (10 mg daily) + Potassium Nitrate (6 mmol three times daily) Active arm will be 6 weeks in duration followed by a 2 week washout period.
Potassium Chloride (KCl) + Placebo for EmpaPlacebo comparatorDrug: Potassium Chloride + Placebo for EmpagliflozinPotassium Chloride (6 mmol three times daily) + Placebo for Empagliflozin Placebo arm will be 6 weeks in duration followed by a 2 week washout period.
  • Empagliflozin + Potassium Chloride (Drug), also known as Jardiance + KCl: Empagliflozin is the active intervention that may improve mitochondrial function and energy fuel metabolism in skeletal muscle. KCl is an active control.
  • Empagliflozin + Potassium Nitrate (Drug), also known as Jardiance + KNO3: Empagliflozin + KNO3 is the active intervention that may improve mitochondrial function and energy fuel metabolism in skeletal muscle, as well as increase skeletal muscle perfusion during exercise.
  • Potassium Chloride + Placebo for Empagliflozin (Drug), also known as KCl + Placebo: Active control.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Submaximal Exercise Endurance [Week 6]: Time to exhaustion while exercising at 75% peak workload

Secondary outcomes

  • Intramuscular Perfusion [Week 6]: MRI assessment of skeletal muscle perfusion
  • VO2 Kinetics [Week 6]: Assess the impact of interventions on the kinetics of oxygen consumption (VO2 kinetics) during exercise and recovery. "On" and "Off" kinetics will be modeled during the submaximal exercise transient.
  • VO2 Efficiency [Week 6]: Assess the impact of interventions on the efficiency of oxygen consumed above basal metabolic rate compared to total work performed
  • Vasodilatory Reserve [Week 6]: Percent change in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) at baseline vs SVR at 4 minutes of exercise at end of each intervention period
  • Venous Substrate Concentration [Week 6]: Change in venous substrate concentrations at time of fatigue at end of each intervention period
  • Respiratory Exchange Ratio [Week 6]: Change in RER at 4 minutes of exercise at end of each intervention period
  • KCCQ Overall Summary Score [Week 6]: Assess impact of interventions on quality of life based on Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score
  • Ambulatory Physical Activity [Week 6]: Use actigraphy to document the average steps per day taken during the final week of each interventional period
  • Muscle Tissue Respirometry [Week 6]: Measure tissue rates of substrate metabolism and mitochondrial content
  • Muscle Proteome [Week 6]: Measure relative abundances of proteins related to fatty acid and ketone oxidation as well as proteins related to mitochondrial biogenesis.
  • Muscle Metabolome [Week 6]: Perform targeted quantitative metabolomics to assess changes in substrate metabolism
  • Skeletal Muscle Oxidative Capacity [Week 6]: MRI assessment of skeletal muscle oxidative phosphorylation capacity
  • Arteriovenous O2 content difference [Week 6]: quotient of VO2 to cardiac output
  • Peak VO2 during Submaximal Exercise [Week 6]: Assess the impact of interventions on the peak oxygen consumption achieved during submaximal exercise

Other outcomes

  • Intramyocardial Filling Pressure [Week 6]: Assess impact of interventions on intramyocardial filling pressures during submaximal exercise

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion:

1\. NYHA Class II-III symptoms 2. Left ventricular ejection fraction >= 50% 3. Stable medical condition for at least 2 weeks, as per investigator judgment 4. Prior or current evidence for elevated filling pressures, as evidenced by at least one of the following:

a. Mitral early (E)/septal tissue annular (e') velocity ratio > 8, in the context of a septal e' velocity <=7 cm/s or a lateral e' <= 10 cm/s, in addition to one of the following: i. Large left atrium (LA volume index > 34 mL/m2) ii. Chronic loop diuretic use for control of symptoms iii. Elevated natriuretic peptides within the past year (e.g., NTproBNP > 125 pg/mL in sinus rhythm or > 375 pg/mL if in atrial fibrillation) b. Mitral E/e' ratio > 14 at rest or during exercise c. Elevated invasively-determined filling pressures previously (resting left ventricular end-diastolic pressure >= 16 mm Hg or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >= 15 mmHg; or PCWP/LVEDP >= 25 mmHg with exercise) d. Prior episode of acute heart failure requiring IV diuretics

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Age <18 years old
2. Pregnancy: Women of childbearing potential will undergo a urine pregnancy test during the screening visit.
3. Treatment with organic nitrates or phosphodiesterase inhibitors that cannot be interrupted
4. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, as defined by a resting atrial fibrillation heart rate > 100 beats per minute at the time of the baseline assessment
5. Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL
6. Subject inability/unwillingness to exercise
7. Moderate or greater left sided valvular disease (mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation), mild or greater mitral stenosis, severe right-sided valvular disease
8. Known hypertrophic, infiltrative, or inflammatory cardiomyopathy
9. Clinically significant pericardial disease, as per investigator judgment
10. Current angina due to clinically significant epicardial coronary disease, as per investigator judgment
11. Acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention within the past 2 months
12. Primary pulmonary artery hypertension (WHO Group 1 Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension)
13. Clinically significant lung disease as defined by: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Stage III or greater GOLD criteria (FEV1<50%), treatment with oral steroids within the past 6 months for an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease, current use of supplemental oxygen aside from nocturnal oxygen for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

    \- Desaturation to <90% on the baseline maximal effort cardiopulmonary exercise test will also be grounds for exclusion
14. Clinically-significant ischemia, as per investigator's judgement, on stress testing without either (1) subsequent revascularization, (2) an angiogram demonstrating the absence of clinically significant epicardial coronary artery disease, as per investigator judgment; (3) a follow-up 'negative' stress test, particularly when using a more specific technique (i.e., a negative perfusion imaging test following a 'positive' ECG stress test)

    \- Exercise-induced regional wall motion abnormalities on the echocardiographic assessment during the baseline maximal effort cardiopulmonary exercise test will also be exclusionary
15. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% on a prior echocardiogram or cardiac MRI, unless the reduced LVEF occurred within the context of an uncontrolled supraventricular arrhythmia, with return of a normal ejection fraction following treatment of the arrhythmia
16. Significant liver disease impacting synthetic function or volume control (ALT/AST > 3x ULN, Albumin < 3.0 g/dL)
17. eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2.
18. Methemoglobin > 5%
19. Serum potassium > 5.0 mEq/L on baseline testing
20. Type I Diabetes
21. History of ketoacidosis
22. Current use of, or prior intolerance to, an SGLT2i
23. Ongoing maintenance of a 'Ketogenic Diet' (low carbohydrate, high fat)
24. Allergy to beets
25. Severe right ventricular dysfunction
26. Baseline resting seated systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or < 100 mmHg
27. Persistently low or high seated blood pressure or orthostatic blood pressure response to the transition from supine to standing (>20 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure 2-3 minutes after standing, or a fall in SBP to < 90 mmHg) at the baseline visit
28. Active participation in another study that utilizes an investigational agent (observational studies/registries allowed)
29. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the completion/performance of the study. This may include comorbid or psychiatric conditions that may impede successful completion of the protocol, or logistical concerns (e.g., inability to travel to the exercise unit).

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
University of Pennsylvania Health SystemPhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaUnited StatesRecruiting

+Study documents

+Investigators