TrialReader


The SELUTION DeNovo Study

NCT04859985 — Not applicable, Active not recruiting, 3326 participants, M.A. Med Alliance S.A.

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Selution DeNovo - A Prospective Randomized, Multi-centre, International, Open Label, Clinical Trial Comparing the Selution DEB Strategy Versus DES Strategy.

RegistryNCT04859985
StatusActive not recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment3326 (Actual)
SponsorM.A. Med Alliance S.A. (Industry)
ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
InterventionsSELUTION SLR, DES (Device)
Datesstart 2021-05-15, primary completion 2025-09-15, completion 2030-10-31 (estimated), first posted 2021-04-26, last updated 2026-01-22
Locations62 sites in Austria, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland and 4 more countries

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Coronary Artery Disease All trials of SELUTION SLR All trials of DES

-Summary

A Prospective Randomized, Multi-centre, International, Open Label, Clinical trial comparing the Selution DEB strategy versus DES strategy.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Randomized, multi-centre, international, open label, clinical trial. Patients meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment of all lesions of the identified trial target vessel(s) with either the SELUTION SLR DEB or DES.

Patients randomized to the SELUTION SLR DEB arm will receive lesion preparation according to the 3rd DCB consensus (optimal balloon angioplasty with adjunct treatment using high-pressure balloon, shockwave, rotational atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloon at the discretion of the operator when necessary to maximize lumen diameter). Patients with lesions that are then best treated by provisional stenting (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis > 30% or FFR < 0.8) before or after use of DEB will receive a DES but remain in the SELUTION DEB group (intention to treat analysis).

Patients randomized to the DES arm will receive treatment using any CE-marked DES, as per standard institutional practice. Patients with failure to deliver DES will be first treated by provisional DEB using the SELUTION DEB, and failing that, with any other device deemed appropriate.

Staged procedures are allowed if they are planned less than 45 days after the index procedure and are done according to the initial treatment allocation for all trial target vessels (DEB if DEB arm, DES if DES arm).

The study will test:

1. for non-inferiority of a DEB plus provisional DES treatment strategy versus a systematic DES strategy with respect to the primary endpoint of TVF at 12 months.
2. for non-inferiority of a DEB plus provisional DES treatment strategy versus a systematic DES strategy with respect to the primary endpoint of TVF at 5 years. If non-inferiority is then established, superiority of the DEB strategy with TVF as an endpoint will be tested.

All Patients will be followed for clinical outcomes at 30 days, 6 months, 1 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
SELUTION SLR DEBExperimentalDevice: SELUTION SLRDevice: SELUTION SLR DEB. For patients randomized to the DEB strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DEB after appropriate lesion preparation, but provisional DES implantation is acceptable if the angiographic result is considered insufficient either after lesion preparation of after DEB treatment (poor flow, dissection type C or higher, residual stenosis > 30%). For bifurcation lesions, when both main and side- branch are considered to require treatment, a DEB should be used for both.
DESOtherDevice: DESDevice: Drug Eluting Stent. For patients randomized to the DES strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DES, but use of a SELUTION SLR™ DEB or any other device is acceptable if a DES cannot be delivered to the target lesion. For bifurcation lesions, if the side-branch requires treatment it should be treated with another DES or with POBA, at the discretion of the operator, but not with a DEB.
  • SELUTION SLR (Device): Patients randomized to the SELUTION SLR™ DEB arm will receive lesion preparation according to the 3rd DCB consensus (optimal balloon angioplasty with adjunct treatment using high-pressure balloon, shockwave, rotational atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloon at the discretion of the operator when necessary to maximize lumen diameter). Patients with lesions that are then best treated by provisional stenting (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis > 30% or FFR < 0.8) before or after use of DEB will receive a DES but remain in the SELUTION SLR™ DEB group (intention to treat analysis).
  • DES (Device): For patients randomized to the DES strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DES, but use of a SELUTION SLR™ DEB or any other device is acceptable if a DES cannot be delivered to the target lesion. For bifurcation lesions, if the side-branch requires treatment it should be treated with another DES or with POBA, at the discretion of the operator, but not with a DEB.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • TVF [1 year after treatment]: \- TVF (cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR) at 1 year
  • TVF [5 years after treatment]: \- TVF (cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR)) at 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  • Death or any MI [30 days after treatment]: Cardiac death, non-cardiac death, or any Myocardial Infarction
  • CD-TVR [30 days after treatment]: Clinically driven - Target Vessel Revascularization
  • TVF [2, 3, 4, 5 years after treatment]: Target Vessel Failure
  • Any revascularization [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: 1. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) - any and clinically driven 2. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) - any and clinically driven 3. A new lesion revascularization in a target vessel 4. Non-Target vessel revascularization
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI) [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: 1. Peri-procedural MI 2. Target-vessel MI 3. Non-target-vessel MI 4. MI type (1 to 5) according to the 4th universal definition
  • Composite of cardiac death or target vessel MI [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Composite of cardiac death or target vessel Myocardial Infarction
  • All-cause mortality [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: * Cardiac mortality * Non-cardiac mortality
  • Patient-oriented ARC-2 composite endpoint [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: 1. All-cause mortality 2. Any stroke 3. Any MI (includes non-target vessel territory) 4. Any revascularization
  • Site-reported stroke [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Site-reported stroke
  • Site-reported BARC 3-5 Bleeding [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Site-reported BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ) 3-5 Bleeding
  • Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries [1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Total costs of materials used during treatment
  • Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries [1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Time of procedure. Total minutes from patient introducer introduction until removal
  • Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries [1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Total hospitalization days per procedure.
  • Net clinical benefit, a combination of freedom from TVF and/or BARC 3-5 bleeding [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Net clinical benefit, a combination of freedom from (Target Vessel Failure) TVF and/or BARC 3-5 bleeding
  • Device success [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Device success defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of < 30% (site-reported), using the assigned device only
  • Lesion success [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Lesion success defined as achievement of < 30% residual stenosis (site-reported), using any PCI method
  • Procedure success [30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment]: Procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of < 30% (site-reported) using any PCI method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat target vessel revascularization during hospital stay

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Subjects must meet all the following criteria to participate in the trial:

* Subject age is ≥ 18 years (or 21 according to countries legal age)
* Female subjects of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test ≤7 days before the procedure or are using a contraceptive device or drug.
* Documented angina and/or positive functional testing or unstable angina or stabilized NSTEMI presentation.
* Life expectancy >1 year
* Written informed consent by the subject or her/his legally authorized representative for participation in the study
* One or more native target vessel (LAD, LCX or RCA) is considered to require intervention and is suitable for treatment of all lesions with either DEB + provisional stenting or with DES and is identified as such.
* The number of trial target lesions is not limited, but in the operator's opinion, if the subject is randomized to the DEB arm, the likelihood of the subject requiring provisional stenting of any of the identified trial target lesions is < 30%, and if randomized to the systematic DES arm, all lesions are considered amenable to stenting.
* All target lesions: diameter between 2.0 and 5 mm, and diameter stenosis >50% and <100% with distal flow at least TIMI 2

Exclusion Criteria:

Age < 18 years (or 21 according to countries legal age)

* Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding
* Definite or suspected clinically active covid-19 infection
* Subject is under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship (for France only)
* Subject is unable to fully comply with the study protocol
* Contraindications to dual antiplatelet therapy, sirolimus or its analogues
* Presentation with STEMI
* Presentation with NSTEMI and ongoing chest pain or hemodynamic instability
* Presentation with Killip III (pulmonary oedema) or IV (cardiogenic shock)
* Chronic NYHA class III or IV heart failure prior to index PCI
* Known LVEF < 30% prior to index PCI
* Previous PCI of a trial target vessel at any time
* Previous PCI of a non-trial target vessel within 30 days
* Trial target lesion located in the left main or any arterial or venous graft
* Trial target lesion is chronic total occlusion (CTO) or in-stent restenosis (ISR)
* Subject considered not able to tolerate at least 30 seconds of coronary occlusion for each trial target lesion
* RVD of trial target lesion > 5mm
* Planned major surgery within one month following the procedure
* Currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed primary endpoint follow-up

+Locations (62)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Academic Teaching Hospital FeldkirchFeldkirchAustria
University Heart Center GrazGrazAustria
Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbHLinzAustria
University Hospital BrnoBrnoCzechia
University Hospital OstravaOstravaCzechia
SIUN sote Hospital and Healthcare centerJoensuuFinland
CH La RochelleLa RochelleFrance
Hôpital Jaques CartierMassyFrance
CHU de NîmesNîmesFrance
Hôpital Européen Georges PompidouParisFrance
Centre Hospitalier de PauPauFrance
Clinique Saint HilaireRouenFrance
Universitätsklinik AugsburgAugsburgGermany
Universitätsklinikum FreiburgBad KrozingenGermany
BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus BerlinBerlinGermany
Charite Campus Virchow KlinikumBerlinGermany
Kardiologisch-Angiologische Praxis • Herzzentrum BremenBremenGermany
RKH Kliniken Bruchsal Fürst Stirum KlinikBruchsalGermany
University KoelnCologneGermany
Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH UniversitätsklinikDresdenGermany
Elisabeth-KrankenhausEssenGermany
Asklepios Kliniken GmbH & Co.HamburgGermany
University Medical Center Hamburg EppendorfHamburgGermany
MEDICLIN Herzzentrum LahrLahrGermany
Johannes Wesling Klinikum MindenMindenGermany
Herzklinikum UlmUlmGermany
Ospedale Civile Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare ArrigoAlessandriaItaly
Clinica MediterraneaNaplesItaly
Ospedale Santa Croce di MoncalieriTorinoItaly
Ospedale Sant'andreaVercelliItaly
University Medical Center AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
University Medical Center GroningenGroningenNetherlands
Tergooi MCHilversumNetherlands
UMC UtrechtUtrechtNetherlands
Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Pańskiego UMPoznanPoland
Kliniczny Szpital Wojewódzki Nr. 2 w RzeszowieRzeszówPoland
Szpital Ministerstwa Spraw WewnetrznychRzeszówPoland
National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS)SingaporeSingapore
SengKang General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
Hospital Clinico de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
Hospital Universitario de La PrincesaMadridSpain
Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro, University Hospital of VigoVigoSpain
University Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland
University Hospital of BernBernSwitzerland
Hôpital Cantonal de FribourgFribourgSwitzerland
University Hospital Geneva (HUG)GenevaSwitzerland
HOCH Health Ostschweiz Kantonsspital St.GallenSankt GallenSwitzerland
University ZurichZurichSwitzerland
University Hospitals of North Midlands, Royal Stoke University HospitalStoke-on-Trent, StaffordshireUnited Kingdom
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch HospitalsBournemouthUnited Kingdom
Royal Sussex County HospitalBrightonUnited Kingdom
University Hospitals BristolBristolUnited Kingdom
Royal Infirmary of EdinburghEdinburghUnited Kingdom
Golden Jubilee National HospitalGlasgowUnited Kingdom
Glenfield HospitalLeicesterUnited Kingdom
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUnited Kingdom
Norfolk and Norwich University HospitalsNorwichUnited Kingdom
Trent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City HospitalNottinghamUnited Kingdom
Royal Berkshire HospitalReadingUnited Kingdom
Northern General, SheffieldSheffieldUnited Kingdom
University Hospital SouthamptonSouthamptonUnited Kingdom
Worcestershire Royal HospitalWorcesterUnited Kingdom

+Publications

  • Results publication: Spaulding C, Krackhardt F, Bogaerts K, Abdelaal E, Alfonso F, Briguori C, Bruch L, Cruden N, Den Hartog AW, Garot P, Godin M, Hildick-Smith D, Johnson T, Ladwiniec A, Linke A, Maart CA, Mashayekhi K, Meier P, Meunier L, Morgan K, O'Kane P, Puymirat E, Rissanen TT, Sabate M, Schmitz T, Toth GG, Trevelyan J, Wanczura P, Wiemer M, Wykrzykowska JJ, Urban P, Eccleshall S; SELUTION DeNovo Investigators. Sirolimus-Eluting Balloon With Provisional Stenting Versus Systematic Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation to Treat De Novo Coronary Lesions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Trial. Circulation. 2026 Jul 21;154(3):185-197. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.079033. Epub 2026 Jun 15. PMID 42290366
  • Results publication: Spaulding C, Krackhardt F, Bogaerts K, Urban P, Meis S, Morice MC, Eccleshall S. Comparing a strategy of sirolimus-eluting balloon treatment to drug-eluting stent implantation in de novo coronary lesions in all-comers: Design and rationale of the SELUTION DeNovo Trial. Am Heart J. 2023 Apr;258:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 13. PMID 36642225

My Notes