The Effect of Matrix Rhythm Therapy in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

NCT04696341 — Not applicable, Completed, 30 participants, Pamukkale University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

The Effectiveness of a Novel Massage Method Matrix Rhythm Therapy in Chronic Neck Pain

RegistryNCT04696341
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment30 (Actual)
SponsorPamukkale University (Other)
ConditionsChronic Pain, Physical Disability
InterventionsMatrix Rhythm Therapy, Control (Procedure)
Datesstart 2011-03-25, primary completion 2011-04-08, completion 2011-05-06, first posted 2021-01-06, last updated 2021-01-06
Locations1 site in Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Chronic Pain All trials for Physical Disability All trials of Matrix Rhythm Therapy All trials of Control

-Summary

Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain randomised into two groups. Group I (15 subjects) received a total of 10 sessions as 5 sessions a week.Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions (20 minutes), conventional Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) (100 Hz for 40 μsec), therapeutic ultrasound (1 Megahertz (MHz) for 5 minutes) and conventional massage were applied. Five sessions of Matrix Rhythm Therapy (2., 5., 6., 8., 10. sessions of combined physiotherapy programme) was added at combined physiotherapy Group II. Matrix Rhythm Therapy was applied to cervical and thoracic regions using 10 Hz frequency for 30 minutes.

Pain intensity was measured using by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring 10 cm. Muscle spasm in cervical region was assessed by using a VAS measuring 10 cm. Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess the disability caused by neck pain. Turkish version of Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess emotional status of participants.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

The study included patients aged between 25-65 years who had neck pain for at least 3 months. Patients with radiculopathy who had motor findings, who underwent any operations due to neck problems, who had systemic, neurologic and psychiatric diseases, inflammatory or infectious diseases, history of malignity, congenital anomalies, who benefited from another therapy modality and the ones in whom physical therapy modalities could not be used due to contraindications (individuals with sensory disorders, who use cardiac pace maker) were excluded from the study.

A total of 36 individuals were randomly assigned into 2 groups. Randomization was allocated by numbered envelopes method. A total of 30 subjects (15 in Matrix Rhythm Therapy (MRT) group and 15 in CG) with neck pain due to mechanic causes like cervical discopathy, cervical arthrosis or myofascial pain syndrome were participated in this study.

All assessments were done by the same physiotherapist (FU) before therapy and at the end of treatment sessions. The physiotherapist who did the assessments did not know to which group the subjects were belonged. Another physiotherapist who was not informed about the results of the evaluation treated the patients.

Home-based exercise programs and recommendations were also given to patients. Matrix Rhythm Therapy is developed by Dr. Ulrich G. Randall at the university of Erlangen/Nuremberg. Longitudinal stroking, compression and spooning techniques are specific methods of MRT. Therapies of the patients were done by the physiotherapist who had certificate of MRT application.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Matrix Rhythm TherapyExperimentalProcedure: Matrix Rhythm TherapyGroup I (15 subjects) received 10 sessions as 5 sessions a week. Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions, conventional TENS, therapeutic ultrasound, conventional massage and Matrix Rhythm Therapy were applied. Home-based exercise program and recommendations were also given to patients.
ControlExperimentalProcedure: ControlGroup II (15 subjects) received 10 sessions as 5 sessions a week. Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions, conventional TENS, therapeutic ultrasound and conventional massage were applied. Home-based exercise program and recommendations were also given to patients.
  • Matrix Rhythm Therapy (Procedure): Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions (20 min), conventional TENS (100 Hz for 40 μsec), therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz for 5 min) and conventional massage (using stroking, kneading and friction techniques for 5 minutes) were applied as passive physiotherapy modalities. Normal range of motion exercises, posture exercises, stretching exercises and isometric exercises were instructed as part of active physiotherapy.Five sessions of MRT (2., 5., 6., 8., 10. sessions of combined physiotherapy programme) was added at combined physiotherapy to Matrix Rhythm Group. Matrix Rhythm Therapy was applied to cervical and thoracic regions using 10 Hz frequency for 30 min (15 min for right and left sides each) according to the instructions of the technique developer.
  • Control (Procedure): Hot pack to cervical and upper thoracic regions (20 min), conventional TENS (100 Hz for 40 μsec), therapeutic ultrasound (1 MHz for 5 min) and conventional massage (using stroking, kneading and friction techniques for 5 minutes) were applied as passive physiotherapy modalities. Normal range of motion exercises, posture exercises, stretching exercises and isometric exercises were instructed as part of active physiotherapy.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Pain intensity [Baseline]: Pain intensity was measured using by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring 10 cm (0: I have no pain, 10: I have an intolerable pain). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
  • Muscle spasm [Baseline]: Muscle spasm in cervical region was assessed by using a VAS measuring 10 cm (0: no spasm, 10: the most severe spasm). Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
  • Disability [Baseline]: Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess the disability caused by neck pain. NDI is composed of a total of 10 questions of which 4 about subjective symptoms Each section is scored between 0 and 5. For total scores 0-4 no disability, 5-14 mild disability, 15-24 moderate disability, 25-34 severe disability, 35-50 complete disability
  • Emotional status [Baseline]: Turkish version of Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess emotional status of participants. Each question of the questionnaire which is composed of 21 questions is scored between 0 and 3. Higher scores than 17 mean risc for depression.

Secondary outcomes

  • Pain intensity [2 weeks]: Pain intensity was measured using by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring 10 cm
  • Muscle spasm [2 weeks]: Muscle spasm in cervical region was assessed by using a VAS measuring 10 cm (0: no spasm, 10: the most severe spasm)
  • Disability [2 weeks]: Turkish version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used to assess the disability caused by neck pain. NDI is composed of a total of 10 questions of which 4 about subjective symptoms Each section is scored between 0 and 5 caused by neck pain. For total scores 0-4 no disability, 5-14 mild disability, 15-24 moderate disability, 25-34 severe disability, 35-50 complete disability
  • Emotional status [2 weeks]: Turkish version of Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess emotional status of participants. Each question of the questionnaire which is composed of 21 questions is scored between 0 and 3. Higher scores than 17 means risc for depression.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Having neck pain for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

* radiculopathy with motor findings
* undergoing surgical operation for neck pathologies
* having a systemic , neurologic, psychiatric diseases
* inflammatory or infectious diseases targeting this region
* physical therapy modalities could not be used due to contraindications (individuals with sensory disorders, who use cardiac pace maker)
* pregnancy
* malignancy

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Sarayköy Vocational SchoolDenizliTurkey (Türkiye)

+Publications

  • Results publication: Taspinar F, Aslan UB, Sabir N, Cavlak U. Implementation of matrix rhythm therapy and conventional massage in young females and comparison of their acute effects on circulation. J Altern Complement Med. 2013 Oct;19(10):826-32. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0932. Epub 2013 Apr 26. PMID 23621388
  • Results publication: Smidt N, de Vet HC, Bouter LM, Dekker J, Arendzen JH, de Bie RA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Helders PJ, Keus SH, Kwakkel G, Lenssen T, Oostendorp RA, Ostelo RW, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Theunissen C, Thomas S, van Baar ME, van 't Hul A, van Peppen RP, Verhagen A, van der Windt DA; Exercise Therapy Group. Effectiveness of exercise therapy: a best-evidence summary of systematic reviews. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(2):71-85. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(05)70036-2. PMID 15924510
  • Results publication: Ylinen J. Physical exercises and functional rehabilitation for the management of chronic neck pain. Eura Medicophys. 2007 Mar;43(1):119-32. PMID 17369784

+Investigators

  • Emine ASLAN TELCİ, Professor, Study chair, Pamukkale University
  • Erhan ÖZFİDAN, Dr, Study chair, Private Denizli Tekden Hospital