TrialReader


Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With ADHD

NCT03446885 — Phase 4, Completed, 22 participants, Gregory Fabiano

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Efficacy of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Promoting Occupational Success in Young Adults With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

RegistryNCT03446885
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, crossover, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment22 (Actual)
SponsorGregory Fabiano (Other)
ConditionsAttention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity
InterventionsLisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2018-04-01, primary completion 2019-02-11, completion 2019-08-30, first posted 2018-02-27, last updated 2021-06-24
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity All trials of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG All trials of Placebo

-Summary

There has been little research on the third area of impairment noted in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - "occupational functioning." Individuals with ADHD experience job-related impairments including a greater likelihood of being unemployed and not enrolled in school and for those that were employed they were in a lower status occupation, relative to typically-developing comparison peers. The current literature on analogue workplace settings and the effects of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate includes office-based tasks similar to school seat work. Unfortunately, this is inconsistent with the typical work environment most common for individuals with disabilities such as ADHD where food preparation is the most common job following high school. Therefore, medication effects in this type of setting, most common for individuals with ADHD entering the workforce, need to be studied. The investigators propose to study workplace behavior in an analogue work setting in a laboratory "pizza place." Individuals with ADHD will participate in an interview with a supervisor each day, have a list of deliveries that need to be managed, deal with situations that require occupational judgment and appropriate customer service, and drive to make deliveries accurately and on-time. These behaviors can be reliably assessed within the laboratory. Twenty young adults will participate in two "workdays" within a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design wherein participants will be administered placebo and .3 mg/kg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in a counter-balanced order.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Lab visit 1ExperimentalDrug: Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG; Drug: Placebo40 mg of Vyvanse administered q.a.m. or Placebo administered in random, counter-balanced fashion.
Lab visit 2ExperimentalDrug: Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG; Drug: Placebo40 mg of Vyvanse administered q.a.m. or Placebo administered in random, counter-balanced fashion.
  • Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG (Drug): Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate 40 MG administered orally
  • Placebo (Drug): Placebo capsule administered orally

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Ratings of Job Application Quality [during interventional study session, 1 day in duration]: Three independent coders will review each de-identified application. Following the review of the application, coders will complete a rating form that asks them to make an overall evaluation regarding whether the person was an acceptable job candidate for an interview using a scale of 1 ("definitely not") to 5 ("definitely"). Average rating across coders will be used as the dependent measure.
  • Ratings of Job Interview Performance [during interventional study session, 1 day in duration]: Three coders who are unaware of the study participant identities or group status will view the job interview videotape and completed a form. Raters will provide a rating of their overall impression of the interview behavior ranging from a score of one (Poor) to four (Outstanding). The average score of the coders will be utilized as a dependent measure.
  • Objective Observation of Workplace Productivity [during interventional study session, 1 day in duration]: The dependent measures from this aspect of the study are the number of items completed correctly out of the total number of assigned items (i.e., 225). Thus, the score reflects the percentage of items correctly completed out of the 225 assigned and scores could range from 0-100.
  • Inattentive/Overactive Rating [during interventional study session, 1 day in duration]: In addition to ratings of the interview performance, the rater also will complete the five-item inattentive/overactive (I/O) factor of the Iowa Conners rating scale (Atkins, Pelham, \& Licht, 1989; Loney \& Milich, 1982; Pelham, Milich, Murphy, \& Murphy, 1989). The five items are rated on a scale of Not at all (0) to Very Much (3) and the sum of these items represents the score. The dependent measure will be the score averaged across raters. Scores can range from 0-3 on each item, and the average score of the 5 items was used. Higher scores reflect greater inattentive/overactivity-related behaviors.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 16 Years to 25 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* diagnosis of ADHD
* parental permission and/or teen consent/assent as appropriate
* between 16-25 years of age
* IQ greater than or equal to 70
* permit or license to drive
* ability to read and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

* any medical condition that would contraindicate use of stimulant medication
* any prior adverse response to lisdexamfetamine dimesylate or other stimulant medication
* use of concurrent,non-stimulant psychoactive medication
* diagnosis of schizophrenia or presence of thought disorder symptoms
* autism spectrum disorder

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneAllocated to Vyvanse FirstAllocated to Placebo First
Started1210
Completed1010
Not completed20

Outcome results

  • Ratings of Job Application Quality (Primary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo 3.40 +/- 1.03; Vyvanse 3.56 +/- 1.00
  • Ratings of Job Interview Performance (Primary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo 3.17 +/- .76; Vyvanse 3.33 +/- .91
  • Objective Observation of Workplace Productivity (Primary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo 65.60 +/- 17.55; Vyvanse 68.45 +/- 15.60
  • Inattentive/Overactive Rating (Primary), Mean, score on a scale: Placebo 2.13 +/- 1.33; Vyvanse 2.01 +/- 1.28

Adverse events

Time frame: Each condition in the study (i.e., placebo, Vyvanse) was administered on a single day, approximately one week apart, for each participant. Adverse events were evaluated for the day of administration of each condition.

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
Placebo0/20 (0.0%)0/20 (0.0%)0/20 (0.0%)
Vyvanse0/20 (0.0%)0/20 (0.0%)0/20 (0.0%)

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
SUNY at BuffaloBuffalo, New YorkUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Gordon CT, Fabiano GA, Hulme KF, Sodano SM, Adragna M, Lim R, Stanford S, Janikowski L, Bufalo B, Rodriguez Z, Swiatek D. Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate for promoting occupational success in adolescents and young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Aug;29(4):308-318. doi: 10.1037/pha0000365. Epub 2020 Apr 16. PMID 32297783

+Study documents

My Notes