The Effect of Continuous Passive Motion on Pain Control Following Hip Arthroscopy
| Registry | NCT03407612 |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Phase | Not applicable |
| Study type | Interventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment |
| Enrollment | 54 (Actual) |
| Sponsor | Ohio State University (Other) |
| Conditions | Femoro Acetabular Impingement, Pain, Postoperative, Hip Labral Tear |
| Interventions | Continuous Passive Motion (Device) |
| Dates | start 2013-02-15, primary completion 2015-06-25, completion 2015-06-25, first posted 2018-01-23, last updated 2020-10-08 |
| Locations | 1 site in United States |
Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Femoro Acetabular Impingement All trials for Pain, Postoperative All trials of Continuous Passive Motion
The purpose of this study is to measure whether CPM (continuous passive motion) usage improves outcomes following arthroscopic hip surgery that includes labral repair. Investigators tested the hypothesis that CPM usage reduces pain levels and pain medication use and improves function in individuals who undergo hip arthroscopy.
Subjects undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral repair were randomized to determine whether they would receive a CPM. Those subjects receiving a CPM were instructed to use it for 4-6 hours daily throughout the first two postoperative weeks. The total number of pain medications and average pain scores over the two weeks, as well as Hip Outcome Score Activity of Daily Living (HOS ADL) scores at standard time points were compared via a two sample t-test and intention-to-treat analysis.
| Arm | Type | Interventions | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPM | Active comparator | Device: Continuous Passive Motion | These subjects received a continuous passive motion (CPM) device and were instructed to use it for 4-6 hours daily throughout the first two postoperative weeks following their arthroscopic labral repair. They were provided adequate education on how to operate the device. The subjects recorded their average usage of the CPM, as well as their personal perception of the CPM, at the postoperative 2 day, 7 day, and 14 day marks. |
| No CPM | No intervention | No CPM was administered to these subjects. |
Sex: All, ages: 14 Years to 50 Years
Inclusion Criteria: * undergoing hip arthroscopy to repair a torn labrum Exclusion Criteria: * pregnancy * revision surgery * bilateral surgery
| Milestone | CPM Used | No CPM Used |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 19 | 23 |
| Completed | 19 | 23 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Time frame: 6 months from operation date
| Arm | Deaths | Serious adverse events | Other adverse events |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPM Used | 0 | 0/19 (0.0%) | 0/19 (0.0%) |
| No CPM Used | 0 | 0/23 (0.0%) | 0/23 (0.0%) |
| Facility | City | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center | Columbus, Ohio | United States |