TrialReader


A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VX-150 in Treating Subjects With Pain Caused by Small Fiber Neuropathy

NCT03304522 — Phase 2, Completed, 89 participants, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 6-Week, Parallel-design Study of the Efficacy and Safety of VX-150 in Treating Subjects With Pain Caused by Small Fiber Neuropathy

RegistryNCT03304522
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 2
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: quadruple, treatment
Enrollment89 (Actual)
SponsorVertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (Industry)
ConditionsSmall Fiber Neuropathy
InterventionsVX-150, Placebo (Drug)
Datesstart 2017-09-20, primary completion 2018-10-12, completion 2018-11-08, first posted 2017-10-09, last updated 2021-11-15
Locations34 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, Netherlands

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Small Fiber Neuropathy All trials of VX-150 All trials of Placebo

-Summary

This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of VX-150 for the treatment of pain caused by small fiber neuropathy.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
VX-150ExperimentalDrug: VX-150
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorDrug: Placebo
  • VX-150 (Drug): Participants received VX-150 1250 milligrams (mg) once daily (qd) orally for 6 weeks.
  • Placebo (Drug): Participants received placebo matched to VX-150 for 6 weeks.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Change in Weekly Average of Daily Pain Intensity on the 11 Point NRS [From Baseline at Week 6]: Pain intensity was evaluated using the 11-point NRS (where 0 signified no pain and 10 signified worst imaginable pain) during the last 24 hours on the NRS each evening. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.

Secondary outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Reduction in the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Intensity on the 11-Point NRS [From Baseline at Week 6]: Pain intensity was evaluated using the 11-point NRS (where 0 signified no pain and 10 signified worst imaginable pain) during the last 24 hours on the NRS each evening. Higher score indicates greater level of pain. Percentage of participants >= 30% reduction in the weekly average of daily pain intensity on the 11-Point NRS were reported.
  • Percentage of Participants With >=50% Reduction in the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Intensity on the 11-Point NRS [From Baseline at Week 6]: Pain intensity was evaluated using the 11-point NRS (where 0 signified no pain and 10 signified worst imaginable pain) during the last 24 hours on the NRS each evening. Higher score indicates greater level of pain. Percentage of participants >= 50% reduction in the weekly average of daily pain intensity on the 11-Point NRS were reported.
  • Change in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) [From Baseline at Week 6]: Pain-associated sleep interference was assessed using DSIS, based on an 11-point scale (where 0 signified none: pain does not interfere with sleep and 10 signified severe: pain completely interferes with sleep, unable to sleep). Higher score indicates greater pain associated sleep interference.
  • Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale [At Week 6]: PGIC scale evaluated the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life (QoL) related to the participants painful condition on 7-point scale from 1 (improved) to 7 (worse). Participants were categorized as following: scale from 1 - 2 were categorized as "improved", scale from 3 - 4 as "no change" and scale from 5 - 7 were categorized as "worse". Percentage of participants categorized as improved on PGIC scale at week 6 were reported for this outcome measure.
  • Change in Pain Intensity on the 11-Point NRS [From Baseline at Week 6]: Pain intensity was evaluated using the 11-point NRS (where 0 signified no pain and 10 signified worst imaginable pain) during the last 24 hours on the NRS each evening. Higher score indicates greater level of pain. Higher score indicates greater level of pain.
  • Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of VRT-1207355 and the Metabolite VRT-1268114 [Pre-dose at Day 7]
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Findings in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Responses [Day 1 up to Week 10]: The C-SSRS is an interview-based rating scale was evaluated through a series of questions about suicidal thoughts and behaviors with the possible answers yes or no. Yes represents a worse outcome. Clinically Meaningfulness of C-SSRS responses were judged by investigator based on answers received from participants.
  • Safety and Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [Day 1 up to Week 10]

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion Criteria:

* Body mass index (BMI) of 18.0 to 31.0 kg/m2, inclusive, and a total body weight >50 kg
* Diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy, as per European Federation Neurological Societies (EFNS)/American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guidelines, with pain for at least 3 months prior to screening
* Reduction below the 5th percentile of sex and age-adjusted normal values in epidermal nerve fiber density on punch skin biopsy at the distal site of the leg performed at screening
* Normal nerve conduction studies (NCS), including presence of sural response.
* Average NRS score between ≥4 and ≤9 reported in the daily diary on Days -7 through -1

Exclusion Criteria:

* History in the past 10 years of malignancy except for squamous cell skin cancer, basal cell skin cancer, and Stage 0 cervical carcinoma in situ
* History of connective tissue disorders, sarcoidosis, Sjögren's syndrome, amyloidosis, Fabry's disease, celiac disease, lyme disease, autoimmune disorders
* A known or clinically suspected infection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B or C viruses
* Current clinically significant liver or kidney dysfunction
* Current uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction
* A diagnosis of diabetes, HbA1C ≥8% at screening
* History of cardiac dysrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmia treatment(s)
* Concomitant severe pain conditions which may impair self-assessment of pain due to small fiber neuropathy

Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

+Posted results

Participant flow

MilestoneVX-150Placebo
Started4643
Completed4535
Not completed18

Outcome results

  • Change in Weekly Average of Daily Pain Intensity on the 11 Point NRS (Primary), Least squares mean, units on a scale: VX-150 -2.018 +/- 0.274; Placebo -0.933 +/- 0.287 (p <0.0001)
  • Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Reduction in the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Intensity on the 11-Point NRS (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: VX-150 45.0; Placebo 26.5
  • Percentage of Participants With >=50% Reduction in the Weekly Average of Daily Pain Intensity on the 11-Point NRS (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: VX-150 32.5; Placebo 17.6
  • Change in the Daily Sleep Interference Scale (DSIS) (Secondary), Least squares mean, units on a scale: VX-150 -1.777 +/- 0.276; Placebo -0.665 +/- 0.289 (p <0.0001)
  • Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale (Secondary), Number, percentage of participants: VX-150 39.5; Placebo 13.5
  • Change in Pain Intensity on the 11-Point NRS (Secondary), Least squares mean, units on a scale: VX-150 -1.7 +/- 0.3; Placebo -1.1 +/- 0.3 (p <0.0001)
  • Pre-dose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of VRT-1207355 and the Metabolite VRT-1268114 (Secondary), Mean, microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL): VX-150 3.89 +/- 2.73
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Findings in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Responses (Secondary), Number, participants: VX-150 0; Placebo 0
  • Safety and Tolerability as Assessed by Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Secondary), Number, participants: VX-150 29; Placebo 24

Adverse events

Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 10

ArmDeathsSerious adverse eventsOther adverse events
VX-1500/46 (0.0%)0/46 (0.0%)16/46 (34.8%)
Placebo0/43 (0.0%)3/43 (7.0%)7/43 (16.3%)

Serious adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemVX-150Placebo
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/461/43
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations0/461/43
Tendon ruptureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/461/43

Other adverse events by term

TermOrgan systemVX-150Placebo
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders3/461/43
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/461/43
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/461/43
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/460/43
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/465/43

+Locations (34)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Xenoscience Inc. - 21st Century NeurologyPhoenix, ArizonaUnited States
Phoenix Neurological Associates, Ltd.Phoenix, ArizonaUnited States
Sutter Health - Alta Bates Summit Medical Center - The Jordan Research & Education InstituteBerkeley, CaliforniaUnited States
Neuropain Medical CenterFresno, CaliforniaUnited States
University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CaliforniaUnited States
SDS Clinical Trials, Inc.Orange, CaliforniaUnited States
Stanford University School of MedicineRedwood City, CaliforniaUnited States
Blue Sky NeurologyEnglewood, ColoradoUnited States
Bioclinica Research - OrlandoOrlando, FloridaUnited States
Infinity Clinical ResearchSunrise, FloridaUnited States
Southern Illinois University (SIU) School of MedicineSpringfield, IllinoisUnited States
University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa City, IowaUnited States
University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC)Kansas City, KansasUnited States
International Clinical Research Institute (ICRI)Overland Park, KansasUnited States
River Cities Clinical Research CenterShreveport, LouisianaUnited States
The Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimore, MarylandUnited States
Washington University School of Medicine in St. LouisSt Louis, MissouriUnited States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC)Lebanon, New HampshireUnited States
Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolNew Brunswick, New JerseyUnited States
University of New Mexico HospitalAlbuquerque, New MexicoUnited States
Albany Medical Center- Neurology GroupAlbany, New YorkUnited States
The Mount Sinai HospitalNew York, New YorkUnited States
Columbia University Medical CenterNew York, New YorkUnited States
University of RochesterRochester, New YorkUnited States
University of North Carolina School of MedicineChapel Hill, North CarolinaUnited States
Duke Neurological Disorders ClinicDurham, North CarolinaUnited States
Carolinas Pain InstituteWinston-Salem, North CarolinaUnited States
Neurology Diagnostics, IncDayton, OhioUnited States
The Richter Clinic for Neurology and Neuro-PsychiatryTulsa, OklahomaUnited States
Carilion Clinic NeurologyRoanoke, VirginiaUnited States
University of WashingtonSeattle, WashingtonUnited States
Universitätsklinikum WürzburgWürzburgGermany
Fondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaMilanItaly
Maastricht UMC+MaastrichtNetherlands

+Study documents

+Funding

NIH grants: 2017

My Notes