TrialReader


Comparison of MR Elastography Methods Without and With Compressed Sensing

NCT03260660 — Completed, 25 participants, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  
RegistryNCT03260660
StatusCompleted
Study typeObservational
Enrollment25 (Actual)
SponsorChildren's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati (Other)
ConditionsLiver Diseases
InterventionsMagnetic Resonance Elastography (Device)
Datesstart 2017-08-15, primary completion 2017-12-01, completion 2017-12-01, first posted 2017-08-24, last updated 2018-01-29
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Liver Diseases All trials of Magnetic Resonance Elastography

-Summary

In this research study, the investigators will compare the liver stiffness results obtained from the current Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) method to liver stiffness results obtained from a method that uses faster imaging techniques.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

MR elastography is increasingly used to assess liver stiffness in pediatric and adult patients with chronic liver diseases. While numerous tissue abnormalities can affect liver stiffness, liver stiffness measured by MR elastography is most often used to predict and quantify liver fibrosis. Conventional MR elastography techniques require multiple breath-holds that are 12-20 seconds in length. In the pediatric population, reliable breath-holding >10 seconds can be challenging. Recently, compressed sensing has become available as a method for accelerating image data acquisition, and thus shortening breath-holds.

+Arms and interventions

  • Magnetic Resonance Elastography (Device): The investigators plan to prospectively assess the agreement of liver stiffness measurements obtained using standard of care MR elastography techniques vs. MR elastography with varying amounts of imaging acceleration using compressed sensing in adult volunteers

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus Elastography with Compressed Sensing (x1.5) [30 minutes]: Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography with 1.5 times the amount of standard Sensing applied. Correlation Coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
  • Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus Elastography with Compressed Sensing (x2) [30 minutes]: Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography with 2 times the amount of standard sensing applied. correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
  • Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus Elastography with Compressed Sensing (x3) [30 minutes]: Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography with 3 times the amount of standard Sensing applied. Correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.

Secondary outcomes

  • Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus respiratory triggered Magnetic Resonance Elastography. [30 minutes]: Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography acquired using respiratory triggered Gradient Recalled Elastography. Correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.
  • Standard Magnetic Resonance Elastography versus navigated triggered Magnetic Resonance Elastography. [30 minutes]: Four MR elastography images through the mid liver will be obtained using standard MR elastography and MR elastography acquired using navigated triggered Gradient Recalled Elastography. Correlation coefficient will be determined for resulting elastography data.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to 99 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult volunteers ≥18 years of age
* Ability to tolerate 30 minutes in an MRI scanner.
* Nothing to eat or drink for 4 hours prior to the MRI scan

Exclusion Criteria:

* No contraindication to MR imaging (e.g., implanted non-MRI compatible device)
* Known or suspected pregnancy. Female subjects of child bearing potential will undergo a urine pregnancy test prior to imaging.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterCincinnati, OhioUnited States

+Investigators

My Notes