TrialReader


Comparison Between Oral and Enema of Chloral Hydrate

NCT03242629 — Not applicable, Completed, 120 participants, Sun Yat-sen University

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Effects Comparison Between Oral and Enema of Chloral Hydrate in Pediatric Ophthalmic Examination

RegistryNCT03242629
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, other
Enrollment120 (Actual)
SponsorSun Yat-sen University (Other)
ConditionsCongenital Cataract
Interventionsoral chloral hydrate, enema chloral hydrate (Drug)
Datesstart 2017-01-01, primary completion 2017-07-01, completion 2017-07-01, first posted 2017-08-08, last updated 2017-08-08

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Congenital Cataract All trials of oral chloral hydrate All trials of enema chloral hydrate

-Summary

To compare the clinical sedative effect and safety using 10% chloral hydrate during ophthalmic examinations for oral vs enema group.The patients were randomly divided into two groups (oral group and enema group) using a computer random number generator with a 1:1 allocation (simple randomization, odd number for oral group and even number for enema group).

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

To compare the clinical sedative effect and safety using 10% chloral hydrate during ophthalmic examinations for oral vs enema group.The patients were randomly divided into two groups (oral group and enema group) using a computer random number generator with a 1:1 allocation (simple randomization, odd number for oral group and even number for enema group).One hundred and twenty children aged from 3 to 36 months (5-15 kg) scheduled to ophthalmic examinations were randomly sedated by oral chloral hydrate(80 mg×kg-1, n = 60) or enema chloral hydrate(80 mg×kg-1, n = 60). The primary endpoint was successful sedation to complete the examinations including slit-lamp photography, tonometry, anterior segment analysis, and refractive error inspection. The secondary endpoints included onset time, duration of examination, recovery time, discharge time, any side effects during examination, and within 48 h after discharge.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
oral groupActive comparatorDrug: oral chloral hydrate
enema groupExperimentalDrug: enema chloral hydrate
  • oral chloral hydrate (Drug): Chloral hydrate syrup was available in a concentration of 100 mg×ml-1.The children assigned to receive 0.8 ml×kg-1 of chloral hydrate (80 mg×kg-1) by oral.
  • enema chloral hydrate (Drug): Chloral hydrate syrup was available in a concentration of 100 mg×ml-1 at our hospital.The children assigned to receive 0.8 ml×kg-1 of chloral hydrate (80 mg×kg-1) by enema.

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Demography (age, sex, weight, laterality and medical history) [baseline]: The demography of cataract and healthy children were recorded by using a semi-structured questionnaire

Secondary outcomes

  • Side effect [the following 48 hour after using the drug]: record the following symptom: Vomit after administration、Cough、SpO2 < 95%、SpO2 < 90%、New vomiting、Resume normal activity over 8 hour、Poor appetite、Altered bowel habit
  • the time of Sleepiness:Onset time (min) [baseline]
  • the time of Sleepiness:Duration of examination (min) [baseline]
  • the time of Sleepiness:Recovery time (min) [baseline]

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 3 Months to 36 Months

Inclusion Criteria:

* diagnosed with congenital cataract aged from 3 to 36 months weight from 5 to 15 kg with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-2

Exclusion Criteria:

* with gastro-esophageal reflux, nausea and vomiting, apnea in the past 3 months recent pneumonia exacerbation of asthma, bronchitis and upper respiratory tract infection bradycardia, and facial abnormalities, allergy to chloral hydrate, weight <2 or >20 kg .

+Investigators

My Notes