Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-Iodine as Vaginal Preparation Antiseptics Prior to Cesarean Delivery

NCT03133312 — Phase 4, Completed, 100 participants, Metro Health, Michigan

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Single Site Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone-Iodine as Vaginal Preparation Antiseptics for Cesarean Section to Determine Effect on Bacterial Load

RegistryNCT03133312
StatusCompleted
PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: triple, treatment
Enrollment100 (Actual)
SponsorMetro Health, Michigan (Other)
ConditionsInfection, Bacterial
InterventionsChlorhexidine Gluconate, Povidone-Iodine Scrub and Paint (Drug)
Datesstart 2017-05-02, primary completion 2017-12-30, completion 2017-12-30, first posted 2017-04-28, last updated 2019-03-11
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Infection, Bacterial All trials of Chlorhexidine Gluconate All trials of Povidone-Iodine Scrub and Paint

-Summary

Primary Hypothesis: chlorhexidine gluconate antiseptic vaginal preparation is superior to povidone-iodine vaginal preparation in decreasing the bacterial load within the vagina when prepping prior to a cesarean section.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Patients who are planning cesarean will be recruited and consented for study participation at time of admission to labor and delivery.

Patients undergoing cesarean who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to one of two surgical preparations as follows: 1. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG); or, 2. Povidone-iodine scrub. Randomization will be performed by the consenting surgeon (listed as key personnel) after the patient has arrived into the operating room for cesarean. To establish baseline bacterial load, a qualitative BAL culture will be collected prior to the vaginal preparations. Pre-operative surgical site antisepsis will be performed according to randomization. All other surgical practices will remain at the surgeon's discretion according to standard of care at Metro Health Hospital.

At the completion of the cesarean, it is standard practice to perform a manual evacuation of blood clots from the lower uterine segment. The study culture will be obtained by the consenting surgeon immediately prior to manual evacuation. The cultures will then be sent to the lab for determination of total bacterial load of the vaginal area. The lab will be blinded toward which type of vaginal prep was used. Total colony count will be determined by certified lab personnel by adding all counts regardless of bacteria type. A secondary chart review will be performed by the investigator within 30 days of the postoperative period to evaluate for length of hospital stay, pain level, blood loss, any additional antibiotics received postoperatively, and the development of post-operative infection in subjects up to 30 days after discharge.

The research project will take place over a 12-month period of time at Metro Health Hospital. In review of Metro Health Labor and Delivery statistics for scheduled cesarean sections performed in 2016, an average of 18.8 were performed a month, giving a total of approximately 226 in a one-year period. Based on the research study published by Culligan, Kubik, Murphy, et al. comparing the two vaginal preparations for vaginal hysterectomy, an estimated sample size was calculated. Using the 90 minute colony counts of 20,472 (40,058) vs 1,221 (2,857), and using an alpha of .05 and power of 80% investigator found the sample size for each group should be at least 27. This sample size (27 X 2 groups) is very close to the sample size (50) in the Culligan experiment. In an attempt to ensure the most clinically significant, investigators anticipate screening between 70-100 patients with approximately 70-80% participation.

Analysis will be performed by the investigators for completeness, accuracy, strict adherence to study protocol, safety, and statistical significance. The investigators are also subject to periodic audits by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Chlorhexidine GluconateExperimentalDrug: Chlorhexidine GluconatePre-operative vagina preparation with Chlorhexidine Gluconate Intervention: Drug: Chlorhexidine Gluconate Other Name: Chlora-Prep
Povidone-Iodine Scrub and PaintExperimentalDrug: Povidone-Iodine Scrub and PaintPre-operative vagina preparation with Povidone-Iodine Scrub and Paint Intervention: Drug: Povidone-Iodine Scrub and Paint Other Name: Betadine
  • Chlorhexidine Gluconate (Drug), also known as Chlora-Prep: Pre-operative vaginal preparation with 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Intervention
  • Povidone-Iodine Scrub and Paint (Drug), also known as Betadine: Pre-operative vaginal preparation with 10% Povidone-Iodine Scrub and Paint Intervention

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Bacterial Load [Immediately Post-operative prior to exit from operating room]: Change in total bacterial load from baseline (pre-operative) vaginal culture

Secondary outcomes

  • Length of Hospital Stay [2 or 3 post-operative days]: Number of days

Other outcomes

  • Post-Operative Infection [up to 30 day post-operative]: Presence of post-operative infection including endometritis, pelvic abscess, and skin/wound

+Eligibility

Sex: Female, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Scheduled low transverse cesarean section (can be primary or repeat)
* Term gestation ≥ 37 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

* Allergy to either antiseptic
* Rupture of amniotic membranes
* Preterm gestation
* Active labor
* Emergency or unscheduled cesarean sections
* Infection diagnosis on admission
* Vaginal infection or any treatment of vulvovaginitis in prior 7 days
* Patients under the age of 18 years

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Metro HealthWyoming, MichiganUnited States

+Publications

  • Results publication: Culligan PJ, Kubik K, Murphy M, Blackwell L, Snyder J. A randomized trial that compared povidone iodine and chlorhexidine as antiseptics for vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;192(2):422-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.010. PMID 15695981
  • Results publication: Darouiche RO, Wall MJ Jr, Itani KM, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, Miller HJ, Awad SS, Crosby CT, Mosier MC, Alsharif A, Berger DH. Chlorhexidine-Alcohol versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):18-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810988. PMID 20054046
  • Results publication: Levin I, Amer-Alshiek J, Avni A, Lessing JB, Satel A, Almog B. Chlorhexidine and alcohol versus povidone-iodine for antisepsis in gynecological surgery. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Mar;20(3):321-4. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2391. Epub 2011 Feb 16. PMID 21323582
  • Results publication: Tuuli MG, Liu J, Stout MJ, Martin S, Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Colditz GA, Macones GA. A Randomized Trial Comparing Skin Antiseptic Agents at Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374(7):647-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511048. Epub 2016 Feb 4. PMID 26844840
  • Results publication: Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K, Kimball S. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 26;4(4):CD007892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.pub7. PMID 32335895

+Investigators