Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie

NCT03003455 — Not applicable, Completed, 257 participants, University of Iowa

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie Placed Via a Subsequently Removed Nasal Trumpet

RegistryNCT03003455
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: single, treatment
Enrollment257 (Actual)
SponsorUniversity of Iowa (Other)
ConditionsNasotracheal Intubation, Nasal Bleeding
InterventionsNasotracheal intubation over a bougie, Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation (Procedure)
Datesstart 2012-03-01, primary completion 2016-02-01, completion 2016-02-01, first posted 2016-12-28, last updated 2016-12-28
Locations1 site in United States

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
All trials for Nasotracheal Intubation All trials for Nasal Bleeding All trials of Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie All trials of Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation

-Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nasal intubation over a bougie placed via a nasal trumpet will decrease nasal trauma when compared to the conventional technique of blind nasal endotracheal tube passage.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Detailed description

Conventional nasotracheal intubation techniques (or "Conventional Videolaryngoscopic Techniques," CVT) are known to be associated with significant trauma to the patient's nares and the endotracheal tube itself. The investigators propose an alternative technique (Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie placed via a subsequently removed nasal trumpet, or NIB) which involves using Seldinger technique over a bougie placed via a nasal trumpet which promises to not only be less traumatic to the patient and the endotracheal tube, but also to take less time to perform and have a higher first-attempt success rate than conventional methods. The investigators propose a randomized prospective interventional study comparing this new technique with conventional technique to see if a significant difference exists.

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation (CVT)Active comparatorProcedure: Conventional Nasotracheal IntubationBlind passage of an endotracheal tube via the nare followed by videolaryngoscopy-assisted passage through the glottis, with or without the aid of Magill forceps
Nasotracheal Intubation Over a Bougie (NIB)ExperimentalProcedure: Nasotracheal intubation over a bougieNasotracheal intubation over a bougie, placed with videolaryngoscopy assistance, via a nasopharyngeal airway with or without the aid of Magill forceps
  • Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie (Procedure), also known as Abrons technique for nasotracheal intubation, Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie placed via a subsequently removed nasal trumpet, NIB: Nasotracheal intubation over a bougie, placed with videolaryngoscopy assistance, via a nasopharyngeal airway with or without the aid of Magill forceps
  • Conventional Nasotracheal Intubation (Procedure), also known as CVT: Blind passage of an endotracheal tube via the nare followed by videolaryngoscopy-assisted passage through the glottis, with or without the aid of Magill forceps

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Nasal trauma [60-90 seconds post-intubation]: Bleeding noted on nasopharyngeal exam by surgical resident

Secondary outcomes

  • Nasal trauma [5 minutes post-intubation]: Bleeding noted on nasopharyngeal exam by surgical resident
  • Time to intubation [Measured immediately post-intubation]: Time from first entrance of ETT or bougie into the nare to the presence of end-tidal CO2 via nasotracheal ETT
  • First attempt success rate [Measured immediately post-intubation]: Whether or not there was successful nasotracheal intubation on the first attempt
  • Need for Magill forceps [Measured Immediately post-intubation]: Whether or not Magill forceps were used during airway management

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 8 Years to 99 Years, accepts healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients scheduled for elective surgery with an anesthetic plan including asleep nasotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients needing emergent airway protection
* Patients undergoing emergency surgery
* Patients whom are known to be pregnant
* Patients whom are currently anticoagulated (including daily aspirin use)
* Patients whose anesthetic includes the use of nitrous oxide
* Patients whom are currently incarcerated
* Patients 7 years of age or younger
* Mentally incompetent adults
* Patients whom refuse involvement in the study

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
The University of Iowa Hospitals and ClinicsIowa City, IowaUnited States

+Publications

  • Elwood T, Stillions DM, Woo DW, Bradford HM, Ramamoorthy C. Nasotracheal intubation: a randomized trial of two methods. Anesthesiology. 2002 Jan;96(1):51-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200201000-00014. PMID 11753001
  • O'Connell JE, Stevenson DS, Stokes MA. Pathological changes associated with short-term nasal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1996 Apr;51(4):347-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07746.x. PMID 8686823
  • Morimoto Y, Sugimura M, Hirose Y, Taki K, Niwa H. Nasotracheal intubation under curve-tipped suction catheter guidance reduces epistaxis. Can J Anaesth. 2006 Mar;53(3):295-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03022218. PMID 16527796
  • Abrons RO, Vansickle RA, Ouanes JP. Seldinger technique for nasal intubation: a case series. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:609-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jul 19. PMID 27687457
  • Cossham PS. Nasotracheal tube placement over a bougie. Anaesthesia. 1997 Feb;52(2):184-5. No abstract available. PMID 9059115