TrialReader


A Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guidance for Sacral Lateral Branch Blocks

NCT02750436 — Not applicable, Completed, 40 participants, Montreal General Hospital

ClinicalTrials Daily  ·  Areas  ·  Conditions  ·  Drugs  ·  Sponsors  ·  

A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guidance for Sacral Lateral Branch Blocks

RegistryNCT02750436, acronym USGSLBB
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional; randomized, parallel, masking: none, treatment
Enrollment40 (Actual)
SponsorMontreal General Hospital (Other)
ConditionsBack Pain
InterventionsUltrasound guided, Fluoroscopy guided (Device)
Datesstart 2016-04-25, primary completion 2016-07-30, completion 2016-07-30, first posted 2016-04-25, last updated 2017-03-27
Locations1 site in Canada

Related Papers Related Patents Related Grants Related Experts
AI Assistant Save
All trials for Back Pain All trials of Ultrasound guided All trials of Fluoroscopy guided

-Summary

Sacral lateral branch blocks are used for the diagnosis and treatment of sacroiliac joint pain. This study will compare ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance for sacral lateral branch blocks. Outcomes examined will include performance times and success rates.

Expand all sections  ·  Collapse all

+Arms and interventions

ArmTypeInterventionsDescription
Ultrasound guidedExperimentalDevice: Ultrasound guidedUltrasound guided sacral lateral branch block
Fluoroscopy guidedActive comparatorDevice: Fluoroscopy guidedFluoroscopically guided sacral lateral branch block
  • Ultrasound guided (Device), also known as Ultrasound guided sacral lateral branch block: This group will be treated using an ultrasound imaging device
  • Fluoroscopy guided (Device), also known as Fluoroscopically guided sacral lateral branch block: This group will be treated using a fluoroscopy imaging device

+Outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Performance time [Duration of procedure (less than 20 minutes)]: Block performance time will be measured from the time the first image is acquired, until the last injection is completed. Typical performance time are expected to be less than 20 minutes for both groups.

Secondary outcomes

  • Change in pain numerical rating score from baseline [Baseline and 20 minutes after procedure]: The extent of anesthesia provided by the blocks will be assessed by probing structures known to be innervated by the lateral branches and L5 posterior root. Two pain measurements will be undertaken, before and 20 minutes after the injections. Pain reports will be quantified by using a numerical rating score.

+Eligibility

Sex: All, ages: 18 Years to any

Inclusion Criteria:

* Any consenting patient over 18 years of age, undergoing a diagnostic sacral lateral branch block for suspected sacroiliac joint related pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Inability to consent, iodine or lidocaine allergy, pregnancy, coagulopathy (as defined by an international normalized ratio over 1.4, platelets under 100,000, or a documented bleeding disorder) and inability to visualize the target areas necessary for sensory testing (posterior superior iliac spine, dorsal aspect of SIJ) under ultrasound guidance.

+Locations (1)

FacilityCityCountryStatus
Montreal General HospitalMontreal, QuebecCanada

+Investigators

  • Roderick J Finlayson, MD, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

My Notes